Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Critical Thinking as an Integrative Process

Debating Wolves in Yellowstone

Bibliographic Data

ID6190875
AuthorsLynn Sargent De Jonghe (The Cobb Institute , Claremont , CA 91711 , USA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume34
Issue3
Pages374-392
Publication date2024-07-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1210-3055 • E-ISSN: 1337-401X
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/humaff-2023-0120
OpenAlexW4399281774
LanguageEN
References cited28

The topic of critical thinking has engaged philosophers, psychologists and educators for well over one hundred years. Amid polarized political attacks on the teaching of controversial issues, however, education in critical thinking appears to be nearing a new low, not only in the United States, but also in other countries being torn by partisan politics. This article reviews the ebb and flow of critical thinking efforts, suggests explanations for their discouraging results, and proposes a way forward that treats critical thinking as an integrative process advanced by Mary Parker Follet, and more recently espoused by Bruno Latour and Donna Haraway. In the exploratory spirit of John Dewey and Alfred North Whitehead, I am introducing this essay, not with analysis or theory, but with a narrative of educational events in all their richness of context. These events describe how middle school students addressed the question of whether wolves should be removed from the endangered species list in the Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States. In the course of this discussion, I wish to demonstrate that thinking critically requires moving beyond winning, losing, or compromising to resolution of conflict, and furthermore, understanding that even stable resolutions must be revisited as events change

Biology · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Geography · Sociology · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Philosophy · Psychology · Ecology

  • On Reasoning and Argument

    Open Access•David Hitchcock•Argumentation Library•2017

  • How we think.

    John Dewey•1910

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, Ewer Ewer•Diagnostic And Statistical Manual…•2013

  • Critical Lessons

    Open Access•Nel Noddings•CRITICAL LESSONS: WHAT OUR…•2006

  • An Ethics of Refusal

    Open Access•Petra Mikulan•Educational Theory•2022

  • In the Lap of Collective Impotentiality

    Open Access•Joachim Vlieghe, Joris Vlieghe•Educational Theory•2022

  • Symposium Introduction

    Open Access•Hans Schildermans•Educational Theory•2022

  • Pragmatisms' Generations

    Open Access•Lynda Stone•Educational Theory•2022

  • The Will to Believe in this World

    Open Access•M Savransky•Educational Theory•2022

  • “Making Education Possible Again”

    Open Access•Bianca Thoilliez•Educational Theory•2022

  • Reconstructing Pragmatism in the New Climate Regime

    Open Access•Stefano Oliverio•Educational Theory•2022

  • Reassembling the Social

    Bruno Latour•REASSEMBLING THE SOCIAL: AN…•2005

  • Critical thinking in national tests across four subjects in Swedish compulsory school

    Open Access•Thomas Nygren, Jesper Haglund et al.•Education Inquiry•2018

  • On Problematic Situations and Problematizations

    Open Access•Hans Schildermans•Educational Theory•2022

  • Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making

    Open Access•Shane Frederick•The Journal of Economic…•2005

  • Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation

    Open Access•Michel Callon•The Sociological Review•1984

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae