Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Neighbor” is an Empty Concept

How the Neighbourly Turn in Mass Violence Studies has Overlooked Anthropology and Sociology

Bibliographic Data

ID6197215
AuthorsJean-Philippe Belleau (University of Massachusetts Boston), Jean‐philippe Belleau (University of Massachusetts Boston, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume26
Issue1
Pages73-93
Publication date2024-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Genocide Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-3528 • E-ISSN: 1469-9494
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14623528.2022.2081298
OpenAlexW4281755208
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Can people really kill their neighbours – massively and out of hatred? Is it anthropologically possible? Massacres and genocides of neighbours have become a subcategory of mass violence studies over the past two decades. This scholarship implicitly refutes entire parts of anthropology, notably the Durkheimian tradition, for which society is organized to produce bonds and bonds are inherently irenic, while liberally using key anthropological concepts – intimacy, social relationships, and the figure of the neighbour. These terms are rarely defined or explored. This scholarship implicitly makes four articulated assumptions: neighbours entertain social relationships, that is the essence of neighbourliness; vicinity therefore equates sociality; therefore, when neighbours kill neighbours, they commit social violations; therefore, bonds can be overwhelmed by beliefs, hatred, or other circumstances. However, a close reading of the evidence provided by this historiography shows that descriptions of preexisting sociality are briefly sketched, typically stretching vicinity and mixing vicinity with sociality. By overlooking the scope and quality of relationships between victims and perpetrators, this scholarship tends to treat simple connections, or what network sociology would call “weak ties” with intimacy and kinship with sociality; it has also overlooked how human groups tend to organize and limit sociality across antagonist identities. Vicinity does not predict sociality, even in times of peace, even in holist societies, and even more so when relations across antagonist groups are mediated by rumours, envy, and cultural insecurity. This article proposes a way forward with the use of socio-metrics to better understand social ties and their proprieties

Commit · Criminology · Epistemology · Interpersonal ties · Kinship · Political science · Scholarship · Social science · Sociality · Sociology · Anthropology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Deviance, and Social Control · Law · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Ecology

  • Hatred Is Not Stronger Than Bonds

    Open Access•Jean-Philippe Belleau, Jean‐philippe Belleau•Social Analysis•2023

  • Death and destruction in Dayvd-Haradok. German crimes, local complicity in the Holocaust, and survivors’ search for justice in a former Polesian shtetl

    Open Access•Franziska Exeler•Holocaust Studies•2024

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae