Government instability shifts skin tone representations of and intentions to vote for political candidates
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6201403 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Chadly Stern (0000-0001-8720-584X, New York University), Emily Balcetis (0000-0003-0033-3967, New York University), Shana Cole (0000-0002-1782-6066, Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights), Tessa V West (New York University), Eugene M Caruso (0000-0002-2406-2981, University of Chicago) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Volume | 110 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 76-95 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Editora | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspi0000040 |
| PMID | 26727665 |
| OpenAlex | W2265415877 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 50 |
Does government stability shift the way White and Black Americans represent and make voting decisions about political candidates? Participants judged how representative lightened, darkened, and unaltered photographs were of a racially ambiguous candidate ostensibly running for political office (Studies 1-3). When the governmental system was presented as stable, White participants who shared (vs. did not share) the candidate's political beliefs rated a lightened photo as more representative of the candidate, and Black participants who shared (vs. did not share) the candidate's political beliefs rated a darkened photo as more representative (Studies 1-3). However, under conditions of instability, both Whites and Blacks who shared (vs. did not share) the candidate's political beliefs rated a lightened photo as more representative (Study 3). Representations of (Studies 2 and 3) and actual differences in (Studies 4a and 4b) skin tone predicted intentions to vote for candidates, as a function of government stability and participants' race. Further evidence suggested that system stability shifted the motivations that guided voting decisions (Study 4a and 4b). When the system was stable, the motivation to enhance one's group predicted greater intentions to vote for lighter skinned candidates among Whites, and greater intentions to vote for darker skinned candidates among Blacks. When the system was unstable, however, lacking confidence in the sociopolitical system predicted intentions to vote for lighter skinned candidates among both Whites and Blacks. Implications for political leadership and social perception are discussed
Democracy · Government (linguistics) · Perception · Political science · Political system · Politics · Social perception · Voting · Voting behavior · Cultural Differences and Values · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Group Status Modulates the Associative Strength Between Status Quo Supporting Beliefs and Anti-Black Attitudes
System justification motivation as a source of backlash against equality‐promoting policies—and what to do about it
The face of STEM
Setting the Tone
Investigating whether group status modulates the relationship between individual differences in epistemic motivation and political conservatism
When Similarities are More Important than Differences
A Different Kind of Disadvantage
The causal effect of skin color bias in online dating
Groups as epistemic providers
In-Group Identification, Social Dominance Orientation, and Differential Intergroup Social Allocation
Economic scarcity alters the perception of race
Subgroup Prejudice Based on Skin Color Among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America
Ambiguity in Social Categorization
Black + White = Black
Perspectives on Racial Phenotypicality Bias
Progress in Small Group Research
On Social Stability and Social Change
Victim Derogation and Victim Enhancement as Alternate Routes to System Justification
G*Power 3
Folk Beliefs About Human Genetic Variation Predict Discrete Versus Continuous Racial Categorization and Evaluative Bias
A Person by Situation Account of Motivated System Defense
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Social Identity Theory
Cognitive Representations of Black Americans
Social Dominance Orientation
Attitudinal Ambivalence and the Conflict between Group and System Justification Motives in Low Status Groups
Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies
Group Socialization
The ‘Black Sheep Effect’
Racial attitudes and visual cues in political judgments
Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory
Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations
Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo
Look Black in anger
On the ideology of hypodescent
Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of black–white biracials
Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality as Independent Predictors of Self-Esteem, Ethnocentrism, and Social Policy Attitudes among African Americans and European Americans
Status incongruity and backlash effects
Leadership under uncertainty
Social dominance orientation
A Decade of System Justification Theory
White Selves
Complementary Justice
Casuistry and Social Category Bias
Self-protective biases in group categorization
For God (or) country
Not so black and white
Membership status and subjective group dynamics
Racial categorization of faces
Assimilation and Diversity
Racism and racial categorization
Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system
The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness
Social Pressures in Informal Groups
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition
"Black is Beautiful" and the Color Preferences of Afro-American Youth
When Your World Must Be Defended
Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality Correspond to Different Psychological Motives
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |