Does deciding among morally relevant options feel like making a choice? How morality constrains people’s sense of choice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6202429 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maryam Kouchaki (0000-0003-1292-5134, Nanyang Technological University), Isaac H Smith (0000-0003-4736-0575, Johnson & Johnson (United States)), Krishna Savani (0000-0002-6934-1917, Nanyang Technological University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 788-804 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspa0000128 |
| PMID | 30047759 |
| OpenAlex | W2884373753 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 29 |
We demonstrate that a difference exists between objectively having and psychologically perceiving multiple-choice options of a given decision, showing that morality serves as a constraint on people's perceptions of choice. Across 8 studies (N = 2,217), using both experimental and correlational methods, we find that people deciding among options they view as moral in nature experience a lower sense of choice than people deciding among the same options but who do not view them as morally relevant. Moreover, this lower sense of choice is evident in people's attentional patterns. When deciding among morally relevant options displayed on a computer screen, people devote less visual attention to the option that they ultimately reject, suggesting that when they perceive that there is a morally correct option, they are less likely to even consider immoral options as viable alternatives in their decision-making process. Furthermore, we find that experiencing a lower sense of choice because of moral considerations can have downstream behavioral consequences: after deciding among moral (but not nonmoral) options, people (in Western cultures) tend to choose more variety in an unrelated task, likely because choosing more variety helps them reassert their sense of choice. Taken together, our findings suggest that morality is an important factor that constrains people's perceptions of choice, creating a disjunction between objectively having a choice and subjectively perceiving that one has a choice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Epistemology · MEDLINE · Morality · Perception · PsycINFO · Variety (cybernetics) · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
The Psychology of Moral Conviction
Relinquishing Control Associates With Prosociality and Provides Agency and Positive Affect in Adolescents
Online purchase intentions of affluent women
Balancing the Freedom–Security Trade-Off During Crises and Disasters
The influence of cyber descriptive norms on immoral online behavior
Proscriptive Injunctions Can Elicit Greater Reactance and Lower Legitimacy Perceptions Than Prescriptive Injunctions
Hypocrisy judgements are affected by target attitude strength and attitude moralization
Understanding How Moral Judgments Vary Across Cultures
Sibling relationship qualities and prosocial behaviors in Asian Indian college students
State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance
The Process of Moralization
Culture and the self
The Psychology of Moral Conviction
Thinking the unthinkable
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Hierarchical linear models
Bad is freer than good
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being
The psychology of the unthinkable
Culture and the self
Critique of Practical Reason (Hackett Classics Series)
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice
Culture and the role of choice in agency
Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality
Effects of control and predictability on the physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged
Long-term effects of a control-relevant intervention with the institutionalized aged
Choice and self-expression
The illusion of control
Feeling and thinking
Beyond Beliefs
Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers
Illusion and well-being
| Citations per year | 1.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |