Being “good” or “good enough
Prosocial risk and the structure of moral self-regard
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6202573 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julian J Zlatev (0000-0002-9427-9887), Daniella M Kupor, Daniella Kupor (0000-0003-4747-7343, Quest University Canada), Kristin Laurin (0000-0003-1126-5293), Dale T Miller (Graduate School USA) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 118 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 242-253 |
| Publication date | 2020-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspa0000175 |
| PMID | 31718196 |
| OpenAlex | W2986241676 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 37 |
This model predicts that people are primarily concerned with whether their prosocial behavior legitimates the claim that they have acted morally, a claim that often diverges from whether their behavior is in the best interests of the recipient. Specifically, it predicts that for people to feel moral following a prosocial decision, that decision need not have promised the greatest benefit for the recipient but only one larger than at least one other available outcome. Moreover, this model predicts that once people produce a benefit that exceeds this threshold, their moral self-regard is relatively insensitive to the magnitude of benefit that they produce. In 6 studies, we test this moral threshold model by examining people's prosocial risk decisions. We find that, compared with risky egoistic decisions, people systematically avoid making risky prosocial decisions that carry the possibility of producing the worst possible outcome in a choice set-even when this means avoiding a decision that is objectively superior. We further find that this aversion to producing the worst possible prosocial outcome leads people's prosocial (vs. egoistic) risk decisions to be less sensitive to those decisions' maximum possible benefit. We highlight theoretical and practical implications of these findings, including the detrimental consequence that people's desire to protect their moral self-regard can have on the amount of good that they produce. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
Altruism (biology) · Economics · Helping behavior · Microeconomics · Moral development · Morality · Outcome (game theory) · Prosocial behavior · PsycINFO · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Studentische Forschung im Praxissemester. Fallbeispiele aus der Lehrkräftebildung
Heterogeneity in Prosocial Motivations and Well-Being
Self-serving bias in fairness perception
The Preference for Unsolicited Advice
The Dark Side of Firms’ Green Technology Innovation on Corporate Social Responsibility
How Much Is Enough? The Relationship Between Prosocial Effort and Moral Character Judgments
The Martyrdom Effect in Judgment
Influence of reputational concern and social distance on moral decision-making under the harmful dilemma
Is Virtue Good for You
Playing It Safe? Voters Decode Politicians' Not Answering as an Answer
Consumer Moral Decision Making
Valuing public goods
Justified ethicality
When ignorance is no excuse
Moral Rationalization and the Integration of Situational Factors and Psychological Processes in Immoral Behavior
Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
Self-Serving Justifications
Moral Judgment and Action in Preverbal Infants and Toddlers
Moral Self‐Licensing
Religious Priming
Economic Games on the Internet
A Theory of Blame
Pushing moral buttons
Actions, Intentions, and Self-Assessment
Sinning Saints and Saintly Sinners
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
Crime and punishment
Risk Aversion and Expected-utility Theory
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies
Social Class and Prosocial Behavior
Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation
Denying humanness to victims
The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships
Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making
The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom
The strategic pursuit of moral credentials
The unhealthy road not taken
Motivated changes in the self-concept
Moral traps
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice
The impact bias is alive and well
The case for motivated reasoning
Motivational factors in decision theories
Culpable control and the psychology of blame
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |