Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Being “good” or “good enough

Prosocial risk and the structure of moral self-regard

Bibliographic Data

ID6202573
AuthorsJulian J Zlatev (0000-0002-9427-9887), Daniella M Kupor, Daniella Kupor (0000-0003-4747-7343, Quest University Canada), Kristin Laurin (0000-0003-1126-5293), Dale T Miller (Graduate School USA)
Year2020
Volume118
Issue2
Pages242-253
Publication date2020-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/pspa0000175
PMID31718196
OpenAlexW2986241676
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited37

This model predicts that people are primarily concerned with whether their prosocial behavior legitimates the claim that they have acted morally, a claim that often diverges from whether their behavior is in the best interests of the recipient. Specifically, it predicts that for people to feel moral following a prosocial decision, that decision need not have promised the greatest benefit for the recipient but only one larger than at least one other available outcome. Moreover, this model predicts that once people produce a benefit that exceeds this threshold, their moral self-regard is relatively insensitive to the magnitude of benefit that they produce. In 6 studies, we test this moral threshold model by examining people's prosocial risk decisions. We find that, compared with risky egoistic decisions, people systematically avoid making risky prosocial decisions that carry the possibility of producing the worst possible outcome in a choice set-even when this means avoiding a decision that is objectively superior. We further find that this aversion to producing the worst possible prosocial outcome leads people's prosocial (vs. egoistic) risk decisions to be less sensitive to those decisions' maximum possible benefit. We highlight theoretical and practical implications of these findings, including the detrimental consequence that people's desire to protect their moral self-regard can have on the amount of good that they produce. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Altruism (biology) · Economics · Helping behavior · Microeconomics · Moral development · Morality · Outcome (game theory) · Prosocial behavior · PsycINFO · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Studentische Forschung im Praxissemester. Fallbeispiele aus der Lehrkräftebildung

    Open Access•Verlag Julius Klinkhardt, Timo Beckmann et al.•Studentische Forschung im…•2022

  • Heterogeneity in Prosocial Motivations and Well-Being

    Open Access•Gen Li, Frank Fincham•Journal of Happiness Studies•2026

  • Self-serving bias in fairness perception

    Open Access•Xiuxin Wang, Yongfang Liu•Current Psychology•2024

  • The Preference for Unsolicited Advice

    Open Access•Huanmeng Tian, Xinni Wei et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2025

  • The Dark Side of Firms’ Green Technology Innovation on Corporate Social Responsibility

    Open Access•Xu Chu, Yuntao Bai et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2024

  • How Much Is Enough? The Relationship Between Prosocial Effort and Moral Character Judgments

    Open Access•Zachariah Berry, Brian J Lucas•Personality and Social Psychology…•2024

  • The Martyrdom Effect in Judgment

    Open Access•Christopher Y Olivola•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2026

  • Influence of reputational concern and social distance on moral decision-making under the harmful dilemma

    Youlong Zhan, Xiao Xiao et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2022

  • Is Virtue Good for You

    Open Access•Michael M Prinzing, Merve Balkaya‐Ince et al.•Journal of Personality•2025

  • Playing It Safe? Voters Decode Politicians' Not Answering as an Answer

    Open Access•Cleone Mitsui, Yuta Kawamura•Japanese Psychological Research•2026

  • Consumer Moral Decision Making

    Open Access•Sang Kyu Park, Young Joo Cho et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2025

  • Valuing public goods

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch•Journal of Environmental…•1992

  • Justified ethicality

    Open Access•Shaul Shalvi, Jason Dana et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2011

  • When ignorance is no excuse

    Open Access•L Young, Rebecca Saxe•Cognition•2011

  • Moral Rationalization and the Integration of Situational Factors and Psychological Processes in Immoral Behavior

    Open Access•Jo-Ann Tsang•Review of General Psychology•2002

  • Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?

    Steven J Heine, Darrin R Lehman et al.•Psychological Review•1999

  • Self-Serving Justifications

    Open Access•Shaul Shalvi, Francesca Gino et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2015

  • Moral Judgment and Action in Preverbal Infants and Toddlers

    Open Access•J Kiley Hamlin•Current Directions in Psychological…•2013

  • Moral Self‐Licensing

    Open Access•Anna C Merritt, Daniel A Effron et al.•Social and Personality Psychology…•2010

  • Religious Priming

    Open Access•Abusaleh Shariff, Azim F Shariff et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2016

  • Economic Games on the Internet

    Open Access•Ofra Amir, David Rand et al.•PLoS ONE•2012

  • A Theory of Blame

    Bertram F Malle, Steve Guglielmo et al.•Psychological Inquiry•2014

  • Pushing moral buttons

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2009

  • Actions, Intentions, and Self-Assessment

    Open Access•Justin Kruger, Thomas Gilovich•Personality and Social Psychology…•2004

  • Sinning Saints and Saintly Sinners

    Open Access•Sonya Sachdeva, Rumen Iliev et al.•Psychological Science•2009

  • The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman, L Young et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • Crime and punishment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman•Cognition•2008

  • Risk Aversion and Expected-utility Theory

    Open Access•Matthew Rabin•Econometrica•2000

  • Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects

    Charles A Holt, Susan K Laury•American Economic Review•2002

  • Rational choice and the structure of the environment.

    H A Simon•Psychological Review•1956

  • Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies

    Patrick E Shrout, Niall Bolger•Psychological Methods•2002

  • Social Class and Prosocial Behavior

    Open Access•Michael W Kraus, Bennett Callaghan•Social Psychological and…•2016

  • Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation

    Open Access•David Dunning, Judith A Meyerowitz et al.•Heuristics and biases•2002

  • Denying humanness to victims

    Open Access•Emma Alleyne, Isabel Fernandes et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2014

  • The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships

    Open Access•Laura Wray-Lake, Laura D Wray et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2005

  • Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making

    Open Access•Marcel Zeelenberg•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1999

  • The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom

    John K Whitaker, John Whitaker et al.•Economica•1985

  • The strategic pursuit of moral credentials

    Open Access•Anna C Merritt, Daniel A Effron et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2012

  • The unhealthy road not taken

    Open Access•Daniel A Effron, Benoît Monin et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2012

  • Motivated changes in the self-concept

    Open Access•Ziva Kunda, Rasyid Bo Sanitioso et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1989

  • Moral traps

    Open Access•Stephanie Lin, Stephanie C Lin et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016

  • Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice

    Benoît Monin, Dale T Miller•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • The impact bias is alive and well

    Timothy D Wilson, Daniel T Gilbert•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Motivational factors in decision theories

    Richard P Larrick•Psychological Bulletin•1993

  • Culpable control and the psychology of blame

    Mark D Alicke•Psychological Bulletin•2000

Unique citing works11
Citations per year2,75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae