When conflicts are good
Nonconscious goal conflicts reduce confirmatory thinking
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6202880 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tali Kleiman (0000-0002-1238-7818, New York University), Ran R Hassin (0000-0002-5064-3720, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 374-387 |
| Publication date | 2013-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0033608 |
| PMID | 23855347 |
| OpenAlex | W2023212395 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 30 |
In this article, we argue that nonconscious goal conflicts are accompanied by a mindset that has wide-ranging implications for reasoning and thinking in content areas that are not part of the conflict itself. Specifically, we propose that nonconscious goal conflicts induce a mode of processing information that increases the likelihood of approaching an issue from opposing perspectives. This hypothesis is examined by investigating the effects of nonconscious goal conflicts on confirmatory thinking, that is, a way of thinking that narrowly focuses on confirmation rather than on broader examination of information. In 5 experiments, we show that nonconscious goal conflicts significantly reduce confirmatory hypothesis testing (Experiments 1 through 3) and anchoring (Experiments 4 and 5). We further show that these effects result from a goal conflict by rejecting explanations based on priming of semantic opposites, and priming of multiple goals that do not conflict (Experiments 2 and 3), and by examining decision times as a conflict process variable (Experiment 5). Using various probes, we show that these changes in confirmatory judgments are not accompanied by changes in conflict phenomenology. Together, these results suggest that nonconscious goal conflicts attenuate the robust confirmatory thinking strategy that characterizes human thinking in numerous domains
Cognitive psychology · Confirmation bias · Confirmatory factor analysis · Epistemology · Mindset · Motivated reasoning · Priming (agriculture) · Structural equation modeling · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Understanding the Dual Nature of Ambivalence
The Impact of Co-Opetition on Cognitive Flexibility
The power of coworkers
Know Thy Outgroup
Flexible minds make more moderate views
Implicit motivation improves executive functions of older adults
Changing prejudiced attitudes, promoting egalitarianism, and enhancing diversity through fundamental processes of persuasion
Flexibility mindsets
Cognition is a matter of trust
Too complex to handle
Goal Conflict Encourages Work and Discourages Leisure
The Unconscious Will
Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect
Reasons for confidence.
Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks
The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality
On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task
Goals, Attention, and (Un)Consciousness
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.
Judgment under Uncertainty
The theory of planned behavior
The essence of conscious conflict
The general causality orientations scale
Self-control in action
Activating a mental simulation mind-set through generation of alternatives
Counteractive evaluation
Counterfactuals as Behavioral Primes
Non-conscious goal conflicts
Nonconscious goal pursuit
Hypothesis-Consistent Testing and Semantic Priming in the Anchoring Paradigm
Making sense of one’s actions in an explanatory vacuum
Unconscious goal activation and the hijacking of the executive function
Choice behavior in social dilemmas
Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction
Forgetting all else
Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect
The automated will
The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment
Decision making under stress
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |