Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When conflicts are good

Nonconscious goal conflicts reduce confirmatory thinking

Bibliographic Data

ID6202880
AuthorsTali Kleiman (0000-0002-1238-7818, New York University), Ran R Hassin (0000-0002-5064-3720, Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Year2013
Volume105
Issue3
Pages374-387
Publication date2013-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0033608
PMID23855347
OpenAlexW2023212395
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited30

In this article, we argue that nonconscious goal conflicts are accompanied by a mindset that has wide-ranging implications for reasoning and thinking in content areas that are not part of the conflict itself. Specifically, we propose that nonconscious goal conflicts induce a mode of processing information that increases the likelihood of approaching an issue from opposing perspectives. This hypothesis is examined by investigating the effects of nonconscious goal conflicts on confirmatory thinking, that is, a way of thinking that narrowly focuses on confirmation rather than on broader examination of information. In 5 experiments, we show that nonconscious goal conflicts significantly reduce confirmatory hypothesis testing (Experiments 1 through 3) and anchoring (Experiments 4 and 5). We further show that these effects result from a goal conflict by rejecting explanations based on priming of semantic opposites, and priming of multiple goals that do not conflict (Experiments 2 and 3), and by examining decision times as a conflict process variable (Experiment 5). Using various probes, we show that these changes in confirmatory judgments are not accompanied by changes in conflict phenomenology. Together, these results suggest that nonconscious goal conflicts attenuate the robust confirmatory thinking strategy that characterizes human thinking in numerous domains

Cognitive psychology · Confirmation bias · Confirmatory factor analysis · Epistemology · Mindset · Motivated reasoning · Priming (agriculture) · Structural equation modeling · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Understanding the Dual Nature of Ambivalence

    Naomi B Rothman, Michael G Pratt et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2017

  • The Impact of Co-Opetition on Cognitive Flexibility

    Open Access•Claudia Araya, Kai Sassenberg•Social Psychology•2025

  • The power of coworkers

    Open Access•Feisi Yao•Current Psychology•2024

  • Know Thy Outgroup

    Open Access•Chadly Stern, Tali Kleiman•Social Psychological and…•2015

  • Flexible minds make more moderate views

    Open Access•Kevin Winter, Annika Scholl et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2022

  • Implicit motivation improves executive functions of older adults

    Open Access•Shira Cohen-Zimerman, Shira Cohen‐Zimerman et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2018

  • Changing prejudiced attitudes, promoting egalitarianism, and enhancing diversity through fundamental processes of persuasion

    Pablo Briñol, Richard E Petty•European Review of Social…•2020

  • Flexibility mindsets

    Open Access•Kai Sassenberg, Kevin Winter et al.•European Review of Social…•2022

  • Cognition is a matter of trust

    Ruth Mayo•European Review of Social…•2015

  • Too complex to handle

    Open Access•Siyun Chen, David Ahlstrom et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2023

  • Goal Conflict Encourages Work and Discourages Leisure

    Open Access•Jordan Etkin, Sarah A Memmi et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2021

  • The Unconscious Will

    Open Access•Ruud Custers, Henk Aarts•Science•2010

  • Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect

    Open Access•Thomas Mussweiler, Fritz Strack et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • Reasons for confidence.

    Asher Koriat, Sarah Lichtenstein et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1980

  • Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks

    Open Access•Karen E Jacowitz, Daniel Kahneman•Personality and Social Psychology…•1995

  • The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality

    Open Access•Jonathan J Koehler•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1993

  • On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task

    Open Access•P C Wason•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•1960

  • Goals, Attention, and (Un)Consciousness

    Ap Dijksterhuis, Henk Aarts•Annual Review of Psychology•2010

  • Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.

    Joshua Klayman, Young-Won Ha•Psychological Review•1987

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • The essence of conscious conflict

    Ezequiel Morsella, Jeremy R Gray et al.•Emotion•2009

  • The general causality orientations scale

    Open Access•Edward L Deci, Richard M Ryan•Journal of Research in Personality•1985

  • Self-control in action

    Ayelet Fishbach, James Y Shah•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • Activating a mental simulation mind-set through generation of alternatives

    Open Access•Edward R Hirt, Frank R Kardes et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003

  • Counteractive evaluation

    Open Access•Ayelet Fishbach, Ying Zhang et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • Counterfactuals as Behavioral Primes

    Open Access•Adam D Galinsky, Gordon B Moskowitz•Journal of Experimental Social…•2000

  • Non-conscious goal conflicts

    Open Access•Tali Kleiman, Ran R Hassin•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • Nonconscious goal pursuit

    Open Access•Gabriele Oettingen, Heidi Grant et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2005

  • Hypothesis-Consistent Testing and Semantic Priming in the Anchoring Paradigm

    Open Access•Thomas Mussweiler, Fritz Strack•Journal of Experimental Social…•1999

  • Making sense of one’s actions in an explanatory vacuum

    Open Access•Elizabeth J Parks‐Stamm, Elizabeth J Parks-Stamm et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2010

  • Unconscious goal activation and the hijacking of the executive function

    Hans Marien, Ruud Custers et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2012

  • Choice behavior in social dilemmas

    Marilynn B Brewer, Roderick M Kramer•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction

    M Snyder, William B Swann•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • Forgetting all else

    James Y Shah, Ron Friedman et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect

    Fritz Strack, Thomas Mussweiler•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • The automated will

    John A Bargh, Peter M Gollwitzer et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment

    Jens Förster, Nira Liberman et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Decision making under stress

    Giora Keinan•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

Unique citing works11
Citations per year1
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae