Tandem anchoring
Informational and politeness effects of range offers in social exchange
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6203840 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniel R Ames (0000-0002-4630-5956), Malia F Mason (0009-0002-3295-3044) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 108 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 254-274 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Editora | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspi0000016 |
| PMID | 25603375 |
| OpenAlex | W2002921992 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 17 |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
We examined whether and why range offers (e.g., "I want $7,200 to $7,600 for my car") matter in negotiations. A selective-attention account predicts that motivated and skeptical offer-recipients focus overwhelmingly on the attractive endpoint (i.e., a buyer would hear, in effect, "I want $7,200"). In contrast, we propose a tandem anchoring account, arguing that offer-recipients are often influenced by both endpoints as they judge the offer-maker's reservation price (i.e., bottom line) as well as how polite they believe an extreme (nonaccommodating) counteroffer would be. In 5 studies, featuring scripted negotiation scenarios and live dyadic negotiations, we find that certain range offers yield improved settlement terms for offer-makers without relational costs, whereas others may yield relationship benefits without deal costs. We clarify the types of range offers that evoke these benefits and identify boundaries to their impact, including range width and extremity. In addition, our studies reveal evidence consistent with 2 proposed mechanisms, one involving an informational effect (both endpoints of range offers can be taken as signals of an offer-maker's reservation price) and another involving a politeness effect (range offers can make extreme counteroffers seem less polite). Our results have implications for models of negotiation behavior and outcomes and, more broadly, for the nature of social exchange. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved)
Cognitive psychology · Negotiation · Politeness · Political science · PsycINFO · Conflict Management and Negotiation · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology
Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests
Open to offers, but resisting requests
Beyond the First Offer
Optimizing Counteroffers
To Bid or Not to Bid? That is the Question! First- Versus Second-Mover Advantage in Negotiations
Reconsider what your MBA negotiation course taught you
Hedging First Offers Permits Assertiveness While Lowering Risk a Partner Walks
Infuriating Impasses
The role of metadehumanization in explaining sacred conflict
The effects of anchoring on backers' pledge in reward-based crowdfunding
Deal or no deal? How round vs precise percentage offers and price-ending mimicry affect impasse risk in over 25 million eBay negotiations
How Numerical Cognition Explains Ambiguity Aversion
How and why precise anchors distinctly affect anchor recipients and senders
Win-win in distributive negotiations
Insincere negotiation
From belief to deceit
Room for Opportunity
Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect
Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable
Bargaining and Group Decision Making, Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly
An Interpersonal Approach to Emotion in Social Decision Making
When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring
Assertiveness expectancies
See what you want to see
Precise offers are potent anchors
Starting high and ending with nothing
The powerful size others down
The effects of information and magnitude of initial offer on interpersonal negotiation
First offers as anchors
Trust at zero acquaintance
Biased assimilation and attitude polarization
Misperceiving negotiation counterparts
The case for motivated reasoning
The Persuasion Knowledge Model
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,7 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 15 |