Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Tandem anchoring

Informational and politeness effects of range offers in social exchange

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6203840
AutoresDaniel R Ames (0000-0002-4630-5956), Malia F Mason (0009-0002-3295-3044)
Ano2015
Volume108
Fascículo2
Páginas254-274
Data de publicação2015-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
EditoraAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/pspi0000016
PMID25603375
OpenAlexW2002921992
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas17
Referências citadas17

We examined whether and why range offers (e.g., "I want $7,200 to $7,600 for my car") matter in negotiations. A selective-attention account predicts that motivated and skeptical offer-recipients focus overwhelmingly on the attractive endpoint (i.e., a buyer would hear, in effect, "I want $7,200"). In contrast, we propose a tandem anchoring account, arguing that offer-recipients are often influenced by both endpoints as they judge the offer-maker's reservation price (i.e., bottom line) as well as how polite they believe an extreme (nonaccommodating) counteroffer would be. In 5 studies, featuring scripted negotiation scenarios and live dyadic negotiations, we find that certain range offers yield improved settlement terms for offer-makers without relational costs, whereas others may yield relationship benefits without deal costs. We clarify the types of range offers that evoke these benefits and identify boundaries to their impact, including range width and extremity. In addition, our studies reveal evidence consistent with 2 proposed mechanisms, one involving an informational effect (both endpoints of range offers can be taken as signals of an offer-maker's reservation price) and another involving a politeness effect (range offers can make extreme counteroffers seem less polite). Our results have implications for models of negotiation behavior and outcomes and, more broadly, for the nature of social exchange. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved)

Cognitive psychology · Negotiation · Politeness · Political science · PsycINFO · Conflict Management and Negotiation · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests

    Justin F Landy, Miaolei Jia et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2020

  • Open to offers, but resisting requests

    Johann M Majer, Roman Trötschel et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2019

  • Beyond the First Offer

    Open Access•Wolfram Lipp, Remigiusz Smolinski et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2023

  • Optimizing Counteroffers

    Open Access•Lars Teichmann, Hannes M Petrowsky et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2025

  • To Bid or Not to Bid? That is the Question! First- Versus Second-Mover Advantage in Negotiations

    Open Access•Yossi Maaravi, Aharon Levy et al.•Negotiation Journal•2023

  • Reconsider what your MBA negotiation course taught you

    Open Access•Yossi Maaravi, Sandra Segal•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2022

  • Hedging First Offers Permits Assertiveness While Lowering Risk a Partner Walks

    Open Access•A Lee, Alice J Lee et al.•Social Psychological and…•2025

  • Infuriating Impasses

    Open Access•Jeremy A Yip, Martin Schweinsberg•Social Psychological and…•2017

  • The role of metadehumanization in explaining sacred conflict

    Open Access•Starlett Hartley, Asteya Percaya et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2022

  • The effects of anchoring on backers' pledge in reward-based crowdfunding

    Open Access•Ying‐Feng Kuo, Cheng-Han Lin et al.•Internet Research•2020

  • Deal or no deal? How round vs precise percentage offers and price-ending mimicry affect impasse risk in over 25 million eBay negotiations

    Open Access•Hannes M Petrowsky, Martin Schweinsberg et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2023

  • How Numerical Cognition Explains Ambiguity Aversion

    Open Access•Marina Lenkovskaya, Steven Swelden et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2025

  • How and why precise anchors distinctly affect anchor recipients and senders

    Open Access•David D Loschelder, Malte Friese et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016

  • Win-win in distributive negotiations

    Open Access•Michael Schaerer, Martin Schweinsberg et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019

  • Insincere negotiation

    Open Access•Polly Kang, Krishnan S Anand et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2020

  • From belief to deceit

    Open Access•Malia F Mason, Elizabeth Wiley et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2018

  • Room for Opportunity

    Open Access•Linying Fan, Xueni Li et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2019

  • Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect

    Open Access•Thomas Mussweiler, Fritz Strack et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable

    Open Access•Andrew F Hayes, Kristopher J Preacher•British Journal of Mathematical…•2014

  • Bargaining and Group Decision Making, Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly

    Albert Bonelli, Sidney Siegel et al.•The American Catholic Sociological…•1960

  • An Interpersonal Approach to Emotion in Social Decision Making

    Gerben A Van Kleef, Carsten K W De Dreu et al.•Advances in Experimental Social…•2010

  • When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring

    Open Access•Nicholas Epley, Thomas Gilovich•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2005

  • Assertiveness expectancies

    Daniel R Ames•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • See what you want to see

    Emily Balcetis, David Dunning•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • Precise offers are potent anchors

    Open Access•Malia F Mason, Alice J Lee et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013

  • Starting high and ending with nothing

    Open Access•Martin Schweinsberg, Gillian Ku et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • The powerful size others down

    Open Access•Andy J Yap, Malia F Mason et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2012

  • The effects of information and magnitude of initial offer on interpersonal negotiation

    Open Access•Robert M Liebert, William P Smith et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1968

  • First offers as anchors

    Adam D Galinsky, Thomas Mussweiler•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • Trust at zero acquaintance

    David Dunning, Joanna E Anderson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2014

  • Biased assimilation and attitude polarization

    Charles G Lord, Lee Ro et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Misperceiving negotiation counterparts

    Michael W Morris, Richard P Larrick et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • The Persuasion Knowledge Model

    Marian Friestad, Peter Wright•Journal of Consumer Research•1994

Obras citantes distintas17
Citações por ano1,7
Intervalo de citações2016 - 2025 (10)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 15
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae