Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intuitive psychologist or intuitive lawyer? Alternative models of the attribution process

Bibliographic Data

ID6203937
AuthorsV Lee Hamilton (University of Michigan, corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume39
Issue5
Pages767-772
Publication date1980-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.767
OpenAlexW4240361668
LanguageEN
Citations received45
References cited13

The notion that humans commonly commit a fundamental attribution by overattributi ng causality to persons rather than situations rests on a particular model of the attribution process. That model is a scientific analysis of causality. Using insights from legal reasoning, the present article contrasts the scientific model, intuitive psychologizing, with an alternative view of attributions as sanctioning decisions, or intuitive lawyering. It is suggested that sanctioning attributions rest on a different rational decision rule that tests whether the actor could have done otherwise. Kelley's model of the attribution process appears to be fundamentally a scientific analysis, whereas Jones and Davis's model appears to be fundamentally a sanctioning analysis. The supposed error of overattributi ng to persons is in fact an error only within the first type of model and may be perfectly rational within the second. Given that we are not always sure how experimental subjects interpret the situation or the questions they answer, further exploration of human use of intuitive lawyering as well as intuitive psychologizing is an important issue for future attribution research

Attribution · Process (computing · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Understanding Cross-Cultural Prognostic Variability for Schizophrenia

    Amy G Weisman, Amy Weisman•Cultural Diversity & Mental Health•1997

  • Attributions in marriage

    Thomas N Bradbury, F D Fincham•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Employee Attributions of the “Why” of Hr Practices

    Open Access•Lisa H Nishii, David P Lepak et al.•Personnel Psychology•2008

  • Current Issues in Attribution Theory and Research

    J H Harvey, Jay Harvey et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•1984

  • A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors

    Sandra L Robinson, Robert J Bennett•Academy of Management Journal•1995

  • Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition

    Open Access•Matt Jones, Bradley C Love•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2011

  • Attributing Presidential Responsibility for National Economic Problems

    Open Access•Mark Peffley, John T Williams•American Politics Quarterly•1985

  • Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Leonard S Newman•Personality and Social Psychology…•1994

  • Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice

    Philip E Tetlock•Psychological Review•2002

  • Understanding Attributions of Corporate Social Irresponsibility

    Dierk Lange, Donald Lange et al.•Academy of Management Review•2012

  • Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ)

    Open Access•Volker Rybowiak, Harry Garst et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•1999

  • In a ‘bad’ place? Location and the relationship between tax haven use and corporate reputation

    Open Access•Giulio Nardella, Chris Jones et al.•Journal of International Business…•2026

  • Corporate social (ir)responsibility

    Open Access•Mirian Albert Pires, Ludmila Mourão et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2020

  • (Ir)responsabilidade social empresarial

    Open Access•Mirian Albert Pires, Ludmila Mourão et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2020

  • Desiring to punish leaders

    Open Access•Ramadhar Singh, Himanshu Rai•Journal of Theoretical Social…•2021

  • Effect of appeal orientation in sponsored ad forwarding on a microblog platform

    Open Access•Chenyan Gu, Yunjie Xu et al.•Internet Research•2020

  • Interpreting workplace identities

    Open Access•Kimberly D Elsbach•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2003

  • Students’ Perceptions of Justice

    Open Access•Diane R Follingstad, Caihong R Li et al.•Journal of Family Violence•2020

  • The effects of sex and marital/parental status on performance evaluations and attributions

    Open Access•Joyce E A Russell, Michael C Rush•Sex Roles•1987

  • Psychological causality in the attribution of responsibility for rape

    Open Access•Richard L Wiener, Nora Rinehart•Sex Roles•1986

  • A Field Study of Causal Inferences and Consumer Reaction

    Valerie S Folkes, Susan Koletsky et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1987

  • Proximity biases in the attribution of civil liability

    Joel T Johnson, Jerome Drobny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985

  • Making Secular and Religious Attributions

    Michael B Lupfer, Stephen J De Paola et al.•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1994

  • Attributions of Responsibility to God

    Richard L Gorsuch, Craig S Smith•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1983

  • The Institutionalization of Sanctions for Wrongdoing inside Organizations

    Open Access•Joseph Sanders, V Lee Hamilton et al.•Law & Society Review•1998

  • The attribution of morality

    Glenn D Reeder, John M Spores•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Reasons and other causes

    Don Locke, Donald C Pennington et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

  • Studies in intuitive personology from an idiothetic point of view

    Open Access•James T Lamiell, Mark A Foss et al.•Journal of Personality•1983

  • Toward a further understanding of the intuitive personologist

    Open Access•James T Lamiell, Mark A Foss et al.•Journal of Personality•1983

  • An Integrated Model of Attribution of Responsibility for Wrongdoing in Organizations

    Open Access•Jeannine A Gailey, Matthew T Lee•Social Psychology Quarterly•2005

  • Twenty five on

    Open Access•Robert Vincent Joule•European Journal of Social…•1986

  • Does the distinction between causal and moral responsibility really salvage the defensive attribution hypothesis

    Open Access•F D Fincham•European Journal of Social…•1984

  • The dilution effect

    Open Access•Philip E Tetlock, Jennifer S Lerner et al.•European Journal of Social…•1996

  • The dramaturgic perspective

    Open Access•Mary K Babcock•European Journal of Social…•1989

  • The vicissitudes of attitudes and similar representational constructs in twentieth century psychology

    Open Access•William J Mcguire•European Journal of Social…•1986

  • Beyond righting the wrong

    Open Access•Meena Andiappan, Linda Klebe Trevino•Human Relations•2011

  • Subjective probabilities and moral judgments

    Open Access•Kathleen M Mcgraw•Journal of Experimental Social…•1985

  • Motives and social evaluation

    Open Access•Barry R Schlenker, John R Hallam et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1983

  • Intervening causation and the mitigation of responsibility for harm doing II. The role of limited mental capacities

    Open Access•F D Fincham, Caton F Roberts et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1985

  • Effects of status and outcome on attributions and just-world beliefs

    Open Access•Tilemachos Iatridis, Kyriaki Fousiani•Journal of Experimental Social…•2008

  • Dispositional vs. Situational Interpretations of Milgram's Obedience Experiments

    Open Access•John Sabini, Maury Silver•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1983

  • The voter as juror

    Open Access•Mark Peffley•Political Behavior•1984

  • Managing Blame

    Open Access•Kathleen M Mcgraw•American Political Science Review•1991

  • Justice and organizational punishment

    Open Access•Gail A Ball, Linda Klebe Trevino et al.•Social Justice Research•1993

  • Interactional fairness judgments

    Open Access•Robert J Bies, Debra L Shapiro•Social Justice Research•1987

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • The American jury

    Harry Kalven•The American jury•1971

  • The psychology of interpersonal relations.

    Fritz Heider•1958

  • The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings

    Lee Ross•Advances in Experimental Social…•1977

  • The rocky road from acts to dispositions

    Edward E Jones•American Psychologist•1979

  • Causation in the Law

    F S McNeilly, H L A Hart et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1962

  • Actors, observers, and the attribution process

    Open Access•Thomas C Monson, M Snyder•Journal of Experimental Social…•1977

  • The attribution of attitudes

    Open Access•Edward E Jones, Victor A Harris•Journal of Experimental Social…•1967

  • The processes of causal attribution

    Harold H Kelley•American Psychologist•1973

  • Causes and reasons in attribution theory

    Allan R Bu, Allan R Buss•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • A closer examination of causal inference

    Bruce R Orvis, John D Cunningham et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

  • The how and what of why

    Leslie A Mcarthur•Journal of Personality and Social…•1972

  • Obedience to Authority

    Open Access•A David Jones, Stanley Milgram•RAIN•1974

Unique citing works45
Citations per year1,02
Citation span1982 - 2026 (45)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 43
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae