Mind games
The mental representation of conflict
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6204522 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nir Halevy (0000-0001-5491-6979, Stanford University), Eileen Y Chou (0000-0003-2015-9046, Northwestern University), J Keith Murnighan (Northwestern University) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 132-148 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0025389 |
| PMID | 21910551 |
| OpenAlex | W2056821124 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 28 |
| References cited | 50 |
Perception and misperception play a pivotal role in conflict and negotiation. We introduce a framework that explains how people think about their outcome interdependence in conflict and negotiation and how their views shape their behavior. Seven studies show that people's mental representations of conflict are predictably constrained to a small set of possibilities with important behavioral and social consequences. Studies 1 and 2 found that, when prompted to represent a conflict in matrix form, more than 70% of the people created 1 of 4 archetypal mixed-motive games (out of 576 possibilities): Maximizing Difference, Assurance, Chicken, and Prisoner's Dilemma. Study 3 demonstrated that these mental representations relate in predictable ways to negotiators' fixed-pie perceptions. Studies 4-6 showed that these mental representations shape individuals' behavior and interactions with others, including cooperation, perspective taking, and use of deception in negotiation, and through them, conflict's outcomes. Study 7 found that the games that people think they are playing influence how their counterparts see them, as well as their counterparts' negotiation expectations. Overall, the findings document noteworthy regularities in people's mental representations of outcome interdependence in conflict and illustrate that 4 archetypal games can encapsulate fundamental psychological processes that emerge repeatedly in conflict and negotiation
Cognition · Conflict resolution · Deception · Dilemma · Epistemology · Mental representation · Negotiation · Outcome (game theory) · Perception · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Representation (politics) · Set (abstract data type) · Social dilemma · Sociology · Cultural Differences and Values · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Interdependence and cooperation in daily life
How decisions happen
Group Formation and the Evolution of Human Social Organization
Why customers defend brands against negative online reviews
Negotiation as an interpersonal skill
The Character Lens
Economic Inequality Fosters the Belief That Success Is Zero-Sum
Strategic Mindsets and Support for Social Change
A systemic model of academic (mis)conduct to curb cheating in higher education
Conflict Templates in Negotiations, Disputes, Joint Decisions, and Tournaments
The conflict-cooperation effect persists under intragroup payoff asymmetry
How to dissolve fixed-pie bias in negotiation? Social antecedents and the mediating effect of mental-model adjustment
Lay Personality Theories in Interactive Decisions
The R.A.S.H. Mentality of Radicalization
The Goldilocks contract
How do people think about interdependence? A multidimensional model of subjective outcome interdependence
Handshaking promotes deal-making by signaling cooperative intent
What a_____ thing to do! Formally characterizing actions by their expected effects
Merely opting out of a public good is moralized
All's fair in zero‐sum games
Conflict frames in the wild
Social game theory
A motivational perspective on punishment in social dilemmas
The added value of perceived values
Third parties promote cooperative norms in repeated interactions
Insincere negotiation
How people perceive dispositionally (non-) ambivalent others and why it matters
From belief to deceit
Social Conflict
Handbook of Social Psychology
An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations
A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Material priming
“In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict
The four elementary forms of sociality
Intergroup Conflict
Deception
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Universal dimensions of social cognition
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
Interpersonal relations
Games and Decisions
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Perception and Misperception in International Politics
Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent
The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure
The Name of the Game
A Look into the Mind of the Negotiator
Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations
In‐Group Love” and “Out‐Group Hate” in Repeated Interaction Between Groups
Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the domain of correspondent outcomes
Retracted
Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation
When values matter
The “false consensus effect”
Psychological status of the script concept
Taboo Trade‐offs
The Effects of Within-Group Communication on Group Decision and Individual Choice in the Assurance and Chicken Team Games
Speaking the Same Language
Between-Group Communication and Conflict Resolution in Assurance and Chicken Games
Perceptual Illusions and Military Realities
The Bias map
The role of situational restrictiveness on self-fulfilling prophecies
Actual versus assumed differences in construal
Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting
The claiming effect
Social Motives and Strategic Misrepresentation in Social Decision Making
Minimizing differences in a maximizing difference game
Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making
Unfixing the fixed pie
Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others
Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors
Theories of Intergroup Conflict
| Unique citing works | 28 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,15 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2025 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 26 |