Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

You don't have to believe everything you read

Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information

Bibliographic Data

ID6206322
AuthorsTobias Richter (0000-0002-0467-9044, University of Cologne), Sascha Schroeder (0000-0001-7001-4588, University of Cologne), Britta Wöhrmann (University of Cologne)
Year2009
Volume96
Issue3
Pages538-558
Publication date2009-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0014038
PMID19254102
OpenAlexW2050826034
LanguageEN
Citations received57
References cited47

In social cognition, knowledge-based validation of information is usually regarded as relying on strategic and resource-demanding processes. Research on language comprehension, in contrast, suggests that validation processes are involved in the construction of a referential representation of the communicated information. This view implies that individuals can use their knowledge to validate incoming information in a routine and efficient manner. Consistent with this idea, Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that individuals are able to reject false assertions efficiently when they have validity-relevant beliefs. Validation processes were carried out routinely even when individuals were put under additional cognitive load during comprehension. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the rejection of false information occurs automatically and interferes with affirmative responses in a nonsemantic task (epistemic Stroop effect). Experiment 4 also revealed complementary interference effects of true information with negative responses in a nonsemantic task. These results suggest the existence of fast and efficient validation processes that protect mental representations from being contaminated by false and inaccurate information

Cognition · Cognitive Load · Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Mental representation · Representation (politics) · Stroop effect · Task (project management) · Child and Animal Learning Development · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Knowing when to doubt

    Candice M Mills•Developmental Psychology•2013

  • The Psychosocial Reality of Digital Travel

    Open Access•Ingvar Tjostheim, John A Waterworth et al.•The Psychosocial Reality of…•2022

  • From Utterances to Speech Acts

    Open Access•Mikhail Kissine•From Utterances to Speech Acts•2013

  • Transportation and Need for Affect in Narrative Persuasion

    M Appel, Tobias Richter•Media Psychology•2010

  • Comprehension of Multiple Documents With Conflicting Information

    Tobias Richter, Johanna Maier•Educational Psychologist•2017

  • Validation processes and reading purpose

    Marianne L van Moort, Arnout Koornneef et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2022

  • Individual variation in undergraduate student metacognitive monitoring and error detection during biology model evaluation

    Open Access•Joseph Dauer, Mei Grace Behrendt et al.•Frontiers in Education•2024

  • Promoting students’ argument comprehension and evaluation skills

    Open Access•Hannes Münchow, Simon P Tiffin‐Richards et al.•Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissensch…•2023

  • How anger works

    Open Access•D Sznycer, Aaron Sell et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2022

  • Recollection of “true” feedback is better than “false” feedback independently of a priori beliefs

    Daria Niedziałkowska, Marek Nieznański•Memory•2021

  • Self-deception and automatic belief

    Open Access•Francesco Marchi•Philosophical Psychology•2026

  • Spinozan Doxasticism About Delusions

    Open Access•Federico Bongiorno•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2022

  • Learning as an epistemic activity / El aprendizaje como actividad epistémica

    Open Access•Tobias Richter, Simon P Tiffin‐Richards et al.•Journal for the Study of…•2024

  • The implicit guides to convincingness intuitions

    Open Access•Ronja Van Zijverden, Marianne L van Moort et al.•Discourse Processes•2026

  • The representational structure of linguistic understanding

    Open Access•J P Grodniewicz•Inquiry•2026

  • Evaluative mindsets can protect against the influence of false information

    Open Access•Nikita A Salovich, Anya M Kirsch et al.•Cognition•2022

  • Plausibility matters

    Open Access•Marion Vorms, Adam J L Harris et al.•Cognition•2022

  • Detecting falsehood relies on mismatch detection between sentence components

    Open Access•Rebecca Weil, Liad Mudrik•Cognition•2020

  • That’s My Truth

    Open Access•Michael Gilead, Moran Sela et al.•Social Psychological and…•2019

  • Communication

    Open Access•Diana Mazzarella, Edoardo Vaccargiu•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • Alternative-based commitment

    Open Access•Gabriel Braun, Inbal Kuperwasser et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • The Persuasive Influence of a Fictional Character's Trustworthiness

    Open Access•M Appel, Martina Mara•Journal of Communication•2013

  • When and How Narratives Persuade

    Open Access•Patrick Weber, Werner Wirth•Journal of Communication•2014

  • The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model

    Bertram Gawronski, Galen V Bodenhausen•Advances in Experimental Social…•2011

  • The Psychology of Fake News

    Open Access•Rainer Greifeneder, Mariela E Jaffé et al.•Psychology of Fake News•2020

  • Epistemic Vigilance

    Open Access•Dan Sperber, Fabrice Clément et al.•Mind & Language•2010

  • The redundancy in cumulative information and how it biases impressions

    Hans Alves, André Mata•Journal of Personality and Social…•2019

  • Examining gullibility with sentence verification judgments

    Yasuhiro Ozuru, Masoumeh Heidari•The Journal of General Psychology•2024

  • Cognition is a matter of trust

    Ruth Mayo•European Review of Social…•2015

  • Memory for Scientific Arguments and Their Sources

    Brent Steffens, M Anne Britt et al.•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Source Effects and Plausibility Judgments When Reading About Climate Change

    Doug Lombardi, Viviane Seyranian et al.•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Validation and Comprehension of Text Information

    Tobias Richter•Discourse Processes•2015

  • Does Validation During Language Comprehension Depend on an Evaluative Mindset

    Open Access•Maj-Britt Isberner, Tobias Richter•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Processing the Outcomes of Characters’ Actions

    Greta C Chan, Joseph P Magliano et al.•Discourse Processes•2018

  • Reading Skill Moderates the Impact of Semantic Similarity and Causal Specificity on the Coherence of Explanations

    Jörg Wittwer, Natalie Ihme•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Measuring Comprehension Monitoring with the Inconsistency Task in Adolescents

    Open Access•Catharina Tibken, Tobias Richter et al.•Discourse Processes•2022

  • The Role of Source Credibility in the Validation of Information Depends on the Degree of (Im-)Plausibility

    Andreas G Wertgen, Tobias Richter et al.•Discourse Processes•2021

  • Differentiating Text-Based and Knowledge-Based Validation Processes during Reading

    Open Access•Marianne L van Moort, Arnout Koornneef et al.•Discourse Processes•2021

  • The Role of Connectives and Stance Markers in the Processing of Subjective Causal Relations

    Open Access•Yipu Wei, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul et al.•Discourse Processes•2021

  • Amazing Stories

    David N Rapp, Scott R Hinze et al.•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Superman Takes a Taxi

    Jeffrey E Saerys-Foy, Paul C LoCasto et al.•Discourse Processes•2022

  • Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition

    Raymond A Mar•Discourse Processes•2018

  • Validation

    Open Access•Marianne L van Moort, Arnout Koornneef et al.•Discourse Processes•2018

  • Knowledge Activation, Integration, and Validation During Narrative Text Comprehension

    Anne E Cook, Edward J O'Brien et al.•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Comprehending Multiple Documents on Scientific Controversies

    Marc Stadtler, Lisa Scharrer et al.•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Gamers against science

    Open Access•Peter Nauroth, Mario Gollwitzer et al.•European Journal of Social…•2014

  • The Achilles’ heel of the truth bias? High personal stakes reduce vulnerability to false information

    Open Access•Myrto Pantazi, Olivier Klein et al.•European Journal of Social…•2024

  • Pragmatic encroachment and epistemically responsible action

    Open Access•Kimberly Boyd, Kenneth Boyd•Synthese•2016

  • Effective Filtering

    Open Access•J P Grodniewicz•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023

  • Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation

    Open Access•Myrto Pantazi, Scott Hale et al.•Political Psychology•2021

  • Synthetic Experiences

    Jan Daniel, J Furman Daniel et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Aligning Spinoza with Descartes

    Open Access•Chris N H Street, Alan Kingstone•British Journal of Psychology•2017

  • Do we need dual-process theory to understand implicit bias? A study of the nature of implicit bias against Muslims

    Open Access•Moa Bursell, Filip Olsson•Poetics•2021

  • Bullshit as a Problem of Social Epistemology

    Open Access•Joshua Wakeham•Sociological Theory•2017

  • The Influence of Paratext on Narrative Persuasion

    Open Access•M Appel, Barbara Malečkar•Human Communication Research•2012

  • Reading Fictional Stories and Winning Delayed Prizes

    Jane E J Ebert, Jane Ebert et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2014

  • How and Why 1 Year Differs from 365 Days

    Y Charles Zhang, Norbert Schwarz•Journal of Consumer Research•2012

  • Sources of the continued influence effect

    Hollyn M Johnson, Colleen M Seifert•Journal of Experimental…•1994

  • Mood and Persuasion

    Open Access•Herbert Ble, Herbert Bless et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1990

  • Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution.

    Yaacov Trope•Psychological Review•1986

  • Gpower

    Open Access•Edgar Erdfelder, Franz Faul et al.•Behavior Research Methods,…•1996

  • Sentence comprehension

    Patricia A Carpenter, Marcel Adam Just•Psychological Review•1975

  • The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English

    Richard Montague•Approaches to Natural Language•1973

  • Updating a mental model

    Jason E Albrecht, Edward J O'Brien et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1993

  • Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data

    Open Access•Hugo Quené, Huub Van Den Bergh•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • On the process of comparing sentences against pictures

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark, William G Chase•Cognitive Psychology•1972

  • A solution to Plato's problem

    Thomas K Landauer, Susan Dumais et al.•Psychological Review•1997

  • Multilevel Random Coefficient Analyses of Event- and Interval-Contingent Data in Social and Personality Psychology Research

    Open Access•John B Nezlek•Personality and Social Psychology…•2001

  • Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase Over Time

    Open Access•M Appel, Tobias Richter•Media Psychology•2007

  • A process dissociation framework

    Open Access•Larry L Jacoby•Journal of Memory and Language•1991

  • The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension

    Walter Kintsch•Psychological Review•1988

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • On The Language Instinct

    Steven Pinker, American Psychological Association•PsycEXTRA Dataset•1994

  • Hierarchical linear models

    Anthony S Bryk, Stephen W Raudenbush•Hierarchical linear models•2002

  • Strategies of discourse comprehension

    Teun A Van Dijk•Strategies of discourse…•1983

  • Resistance and Persuasion

    Eric S Knowles, Jay A Linn•Resistance and Persuasion•2004

  • Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part II

    Open Access•Leda Cosmides, John Tooby•Ethology and Sociobiology•1989

  • The rocky road from acts to dispositions

    Edward E Jones•American Psychologist•1979

  • Half a century of research on the Stroop effect

    Colin M Macleod•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Response Times in Attitudinal Items as Indicators of the Continuous Accessibility of Knowledge Related to Attitudes

    Open Access•Johannes Naumann, Tobias Richter•Psychological Reports•2000

  • Introduction

    Sabine Gueraud, Edward J O’Brien•Discourse Processes•2005

  • What Is Wrong With Anova and Multiple Regression? Analyzing Sentence Reading Times With Hierarchical Linear Models

    Tobias Richter•Discourse Processes•2006

  • Accessing the discourse representation during reading

    Jerome L Myers, Edward J O'Brien et al.•Discourse Processes•1998

  • Inference Processes

    Michael Halldorson, Murray Singer•Discourse Processes•2002

  • Mental Models

    Marilyn Ford, Philip N Johnson-Laird•Language•1985

  • Frege

    Robert Buhr, Robert D Buhr et al.•Language•1983

  • Social explanation and social expectation

    Lee Ross, Lee D Ross et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1977

  • I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”

    Open Access•Ruth Mayo, Yaacov Schul et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003

  • Do YouReallyKnow What You Have Seen? Intrusion Errors and Presuppositions Effects on Constructive Memory

    Open Access•Klaus Fiedler, Eva Walther et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1996

  • How mental systems believe

    Daniel T Gilbert•American Psychologist•1991

  • The correspondence bias

    Daniel T Gilbert, Patrick Malone•Psychological Bulletin•1995

  • Constructive biases in social judgment

    Klaus Fiedler, Thomas Armbruster et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • You can't not believe everything you read

    Daniel T Gilbert, Romin W Tafarodi et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • "Why people say "yes

    Eric S Knowles, Christopher A Condon et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • Perseverance of social theories

    C Arnold Anderson, Mark R Lepper et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • Encoding Under Trust and Distrust

    Yaacov Schul, Ruth Mayo et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004

  • The perceptual and inferential effects of situational inducements on dispositional attribution

    Yaacov Trope, Ofra Cohen et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion

    Julia R Zuwerink, Patricia G Devine•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • Unbelieving the unbelievable

    Daniel T Gilbert, Douglas S Krull et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1990

  • The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion

    William J Mcguire, Demetrios Papageorgis•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1961

  • Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers

    Roger Ratcliff•Psychological Bulletin•1993

  • Situation models in language comprehension and memory

    Rolf A Zwaan, Gabriel A Radvansky•Psychological Bulletin•1998

  • How Warnings about False Claims Become Recommendations

    Ian Skurnik, Carolyn Yoon et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2005

Unique citing works57
Citations per year3,56
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 56

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae