Differential contributions of linguistic factors to memory-based ratings
Systematizing the systematic distortion hypothesis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6206745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gün R Semin (0000-0002-5304-5566, University of Sussex), L Greenslade (University of Sussex) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1713-1723 |
| Publication date | 1985-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037//0022-3514.49.6.1713 |
| OpenAlex | W4236603612 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 22 |
The systematic distortion hypothesis, which is based on a general cognitive bias contention for memory-based ratings of persons, does not account for functional differences between different types of linguistic form.A distinction between immediate terms (e.g., verbs, behaviors) and mediate terms (e.g., adjectives, traits) is offered.We argue that these linguistic forms fulfill different functions in the description of behaviors and persons.The hypothesis that the former terms differentiate features of persons in situations and are not affected by conceptual similarity, whereas the latter are primarily used to interpret persons and are organized by their conceptual relations, is supported in an experimental design in which we varied the type of target person orthogonally to type of situation.We show that whereas immediate terms differentiated for persons, situations, and persons in situations, their co-occurrence matrices are virtually unaffected by conceptual similarity.A strong conceptual similarity effect was found for mediate terms.Both sets of findings provide support for the functional distinction made between the two linguistic forms, and they suggest that the systematic effects produced for the systematic distortion hypothesis are a function of the types of terms rather than the product of a pervasive cognitive bias.The implications of the distinction between different linguistic forms for the person-situation debate and rating scale construction are discussed.What is the relationship between the language we use or encounter in the description of behavior and our ability to judge the cooccurrence of behaviors as they take place in everyday life?This question, which has significant implications for research in personality and social psychology, has been brought to the fore in recent years with the development and dissemination of what has become known as the systematic distortion hypothesis (SDH; e.g., Shweder & D'Andrade, 1980)
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Differential (mechanical device · Differential effects · Distortion (music · Function (biology) · Linguistics · Similarity (geometry) · Artificial Intelligence · Child and Animal Learning Development · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Memory Processes and Influences · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Retrospective estimates of act frequencies
Illusory correlations in perceptions and predictions of organizational traits
Decision-theoretic aspects of stress arousal and coping propensity
The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons
Personality structure across cultures
"Multiple inference-inviting properties" of interpersonal verbs
Fact and Fiction in Implicit Personality Theory
Implicit Personality Theory and the Five‐Factor Model
Language as a Cognitive and Behavioral Structuring Resource
The Linguistic Category Model, its Bases, Applications and Range
Language use and reification of social information
The contribution of linguistic factors to attribute inferences and semantic similarity judgements
Relocating attributional phenomena within a language‐cognition interface
Agenda 2000?communication
How mood turns on language
Linguistic Signatures of Regulatory Focus
Creeping dispositionism
Interfacing Language and Social Cognition
Linguistic Context and Social Perception
Human inference
A constant error in psychological ratings.
Features of similarity.
The act frequency approach to personality.
Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.
Judgment under Uncertainty
How relevant is an individual difference theory of personality? 1
A comparison of the common‐sense and ‘scientific’ conceptions of extroversion—introversion
Act prediction and the conceptual analysis of personality scales
Activation of bipolar prototypes in attribute inferences
Likeness and Likelihood in Everyday Thought
Philosophical investigations
How relevant is a semantic similarity interpretation of personality ratings
A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms
Linguistic factors in implicit personality theory
A universal conception of personality structure
Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure
Trait Psychology and Componential Analysis
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,49 |
| Citation span | 1987 - 2005 (19) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |