Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Decision sidestepping

How the motivation for closure prompts individuals to bypass decision making

Bibliographic Data

ID6207033
AuthorsAshley S Otto (0000-0003-3670-730X, Baylor University), Joshua J Clarkson (0000-0002-0574-7897, Lindner Center of HOPE), Frank R Kardes (0000-0002-5000-8065, Lindner Center of HOPE)
Year2016
Volume111
Issue1
Pages1-16
Publication date2016-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/pspa0000057
PMID27337138
OpenAlexW2460890179
LanguageEN
Citations received4

We all too often have to make decisions-from the mundane (e.g., what to eat for breakfast) to the complex (e.g., what to buy a loved one)-and yet there exists a multitude of strategies that allows us to make a decision. This work focuses on a subset of decision strategies that allows individuals to make decisions by bypassing the decision-making process-a phenomenon we term decision sidestepping. Critical to the present manuscript, however, we contend that decision sidestepping stems from the motivation to achieve closure. We link this proposition back to the fundamental nature of closure and how those seeking closure are highly bothered by decision making. As such, we argue that the motivation to achieve closure prompts a reliance on sidestepping strategies (e.g., default bias, choice delegation, status quo bias, inaction inertia, option fixation) to reduce the bothersome nature of decision making. In support of this framework, five experiments demonstrate that (a) those seeking closure are more likely to engage in decision sidestepping, (b) the effect of closure on sidestepping stems from the bothersome nature of decision making, and (c) the reliance on sidestepping results in downstream consequences for subsequent choice. Taken together, these findings offer unique insight into the cognitive motivations stimulating a reliance on decision sidestepping and thus a novel framework by which to understand how individuals make decisions while bypassing the decision-making process. (PsycINFO Database Record

Business · Closure (psychology) · Cognitive psychology · Delegation · Economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Preference · Process (computing) · Public relations · Salience (neuroscience) · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Marketing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Degree of group consensus shapes perceived power structures and decision-process evaluations of groups

    Open Access•Tianyi Li, Jeffrey R Parker et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2022

  • Disparate roads to certainty processing strategy choices under need for closure

    Malgorzata Kossowska, Ewa Szumowska et al.•European Review of Social…•2018

  • Uncertainty, expertise, and persuasion

    Open Access•Erik Løhre, Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2024

  • Sealed with certainty

    Open Access•Ovgun Ses, Gul Gunaydin et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2025

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae