How Can Liberal Democracies Defend Themselves against Tyranny
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6212112 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Hill (Senior Lecturer in Humanities, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 243-246 |
| Publication date | 2017-10-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1045-7097 • E-ISSN: 1930-5478 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10457097.2017.1355136 |
| OpenAlex | W2747102080 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Tyranny in the modern era turned toward totalitarianism through the idea that human nature needed to be “perfected”; communism's enemy was a matter of class, Nazism's a matter of race. Democracy would seem by definition to resist such ideologies, but even the modern democratic state now possesses mechanisms that can be turned in tyrannical directions: regulatory powers, social welfare systems, and the new tools of artificial intelligence and “big data.” American democracy has been trending toward the “direct” form of democracy that the Founders recognized in ancient Athens and were determined to avoid, a degree of popular sovereignty capable of producing demands upon government that, in turn, could transform a people's government into a government's people. The best defense may be found in classic American literature's examination of national character and identity
Adversary · Communism · Democracy · Ideology · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Popular sovereignty · Sociology · Sovereignty · Welfare state · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |