Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tactics of Waste, Dirt and Discard in the Occupy Movement

Bibliographic Data

ID6220643
AuthorsMax Liboiron (0000-0003-3837-8650, New York University, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume11
Issue3-4
Pages393-401
Publication date2012-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial movement studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1474-2829 • E-ISSN: 1474-2837
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14742837.2012.704178
OpenAlexW2009390049
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited3

Both Occupiers and our opponents have used waste and discards—figuratively and literally—in strategies to create and cultivate a new social movement on one hand, and to maintain power and control over protesters on the other. This study will look at the roles trash, waste, filth and discards have played in tactical decisions by both sides of the movement from the point of view of a New York City Occupier. Overall, the examples examined of trash, filth, discards and their attendant transgressions make up an ongoing political debate about the ideal society by both Occupiers and its opposition. These are the terms over which contests about what counts as tolerable and intolerable conditions, right and wrong, citizenship and the Other, acceptable and unacceptable behavior and what constitutes ‘out of placeness’ have been waged

Aesthetics · Art · Citizenship · Dirt · Discards · Environmental ethics · Ideal (ethics · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Social movement · Sociology · Engineering · Law · Public Spaces through Art

  • Objects and Evictions

    Open Access•Irina Zamfirescu•Antipode•2026

  • From Trash to Treasure

    Open Access•T K Lehtonen, Turo-Kimmo Lehtonen et al.•Valuation Studies•2020

  • Dharavi in Beijing? A Hidden Geography of Waste and Migrant Exclusion

    Guo Chen, Jia Feng et al.•The Professional Geographer•2023

  • Privatization of Public Space

    Open Access•Kin-Ling Tang•Space and Culture•2018

  • Standing in the right corner

    Muhammad Azfar Nisar•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2021

  • When we can’t handle the truth

    Thomas J Catlaw, Jennifer L Eagan•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2021

  • Claiming value in a heterogeneous solid waste configuration in Kampala

    Hakimu Sseviiri, Shuaib Lwasa et al.•Urban Geography•2020

  • Justifying the protest camp

    Open Access•Mischa Dekker, Jan Willem Duyvendak•European Journal of Cultural and…•2020

  • The taste of waste

    Giovanna Capponi•Food Culture & Society•2020

  • Occupy Cosmopolitanism

    A Hamed Hosseini•Globalizations•2013

  • Stop the evictions! The diffusion of networked social movements and the emergence of a hybrid space

    Open Access•Eva Álvarez De Andrés, María José Zapata Campos et al.•Habitat International•2015

  • Infrastructural Discontent in the Sanitary City

    Open Access•Mohammed Rafi Arefin•Antipode•2019

  • Waste and Waste Management

    J Reno•Annual Review of Anthropology•2015

  • Purity and Danger

    Douglas M Staff, Mary Douglas et al.•Purity and Danger•2013

  • Dirt and denigration

    David Inglis•Postcolonial Studies•2002

Unique citing works13
Citations per year1
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae