Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems

Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832–1915

Bibliographic Data

ID6231003
AuthorsAndrew C Eggers (0000-0002-2362-0654, London School of Economics and Political Science), Arthur Spirling (0000-0001-9959-1805, Harvard University)
Year2014
Volume58
Issue4
Pages873-887
Publication date2014-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajps.12090
OpenAlexW1936039364
LanguageDE
Citations received29
References cited53

In Westminster systems, governments enjoy strong agenda‐setting powers but are accountable to an inquisitorial opposition. This article provides insights into the origins of this arrangement from the British House of Commons, drawing primarily on a new data set of a half million parliamentary speeches. We show that, according to a novel measure we develop, government ministers became more responsive to opposition members of parliament in the same period that the government's agenda power was most conclusively strengthened—roughly, the two decades culminating in Balfour's “railway timetable” of 1902. We argue that this increase in responsiveness helps to explain why opposition members of parliament acceded to reductions in their procedural power. We thus highlight a link between government strength and opposition scrutiny in the historical development of the Westminster system

Commons · House of Commons · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Scrutiny · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration · Scottish History and National Identity

  • Parliamentary Debate and Job Market Signaling in Westminster Systems

    Open Access•Patrick Leslie, Patrick L Leslie•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Nonlegislative engagement with LGBTQ issues in the UK Parliament

    Open Access•Jesse Grainger•Parliamentary Affairs•2026

  • Ideology and Participation

    Open Access•David Gelman•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • The origins of centralized agenda control at Westminster

    Open Access•Thomas G Fleming, Simon Hix et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Regulating the Regulators

    Open Access•Vasiliki Tsagkroni, Judith Bara•Political Science•2026

  • The Origins of Parliamentary Agenda Control

    Michael Koß•West European Politics•2015

  • The Emergence of Party-Based Political Careers in the United Kingdom, 1801–1918

    Gary W Cox, Tobias Nowacki•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Comparing Responsible Party Government in the United States and the United Kingdom

    Gary W Cox•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Democratization and Linguistic Complexity

    Arthur Spirling•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation

    Anthony Clayton, Amanda Clayton et al.•Politics & Gender•2017

  • The Voter ID Debate

    Open Access•Ana Alonso-Curbelo•Parliamentary Affairs•2023

  • Parliamentary Procedure under Theresa May

    Open Access•Thomas G Fleming•Parliamentary Affairs•2021

  • Legislative Bellwethers

    Open Access•Jorge M Fernandes, Max Goplerud et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Procedural Change in the UK House of Commons, 1811–2015

    Open Access•Niels D Goet, Thomas G Fleming et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Understanding the political goals of non-binding resolutions

    Aldo F Ponce, Rodrigo Velázquez López Velarde•Journal of Legislative Studies•2019

  • Gender, Justice and Deliberation

    Open Access•D Kostovicova, Tom Paskhalis•International Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Convicting Politicians for Corruption

    Open Access•Luciano Da Ros, Manoel Gehrke•Government and Opposition•2024

  • Unpacking the politics of legislative debates

    Open Access•Jorge M Fernandes, Marc Debus et al.•European Journal of Political…•2021

  • Parliamentary Debates in Canada (1901–2015)

    Open Access•Florence Vallée-Dubois, Jean-François Godbout et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2021

  • Coding the Ideological Direction and Content of Policies

    Joshua D Clinton•Annual Review of Political Science•2017

  • Does Public Opinion Affect Political Speech

    Open Access•Anselm Hager, Hanno Hilbig•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Who Answers for the Government? Bureaucrats, Ministers, and Responsible Parties

    Open Access•Max Goplerud, Daniel M Smith•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada, 1867–2011

    Open Access•Jean-François Godbout, Jean‐françois Godbout et al.•British Journal of Political…•2017

  • The Politics of Procedural Choice

    Open Access•Niels D Goet•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Party Cohesion in Westminster Systems

    Open Access•Andrew C Eggers, Arthur Spirling•British Journal of Political…•2016

  • What is Political Methodology

    Miguel E Roberts, Margaret E Roberts•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • The manifestation of the green agenda

    Marc Debus, J Tosun•Environmental Politics•2021

  • Playing to the Gallery

    Open Access•Moritz Osnabrügge, Sara B Hobolt et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Quantifying Political Relationships

    Open Access•Simon Weschle•American Political Science Review•2018

  • Democracy in America

    Alexis De Tocqueville, Alexis Charles Henri Maurice Clérel De Tocqueville et al.•The Two Narratives of Political…•2010

  • The Efficient Secret

    Open Access•Gary W Cox•Efficient Secret•1987

  • Rational Choice and British Politics

    Ian Mclean, Iain Mclean•Rational choice and British…•2001

  • Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

    Open Access•Andrew Gelman, Jennifer Hill•Data Analysis Using Regression…•2006

  • Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics

    Open Access•Christopher Kam, Christopher J Kam•Party Discipline and Parliamentary…•2009

  • Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew

    George Dion, George Douglas Dion•Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew•1997

  • Bayesian Methods

    Jeff Gill•Bayesian Methods•2002

  • Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Simon Jackman•Bayesian Analysis for the Social…•2009

  • Generalized Linear Models

    Open Access•Peter McCullagh, J A Nelder•Generalized Linear Models•1989

  • Comparing Westminster

    Roderick A W Rhodes, John Wanna et al.•Comparing Westminster•2009

  • Strucchange

    Open Access•Achim Zeileis, Friedrich Leisch et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2002

  • MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models

    Open Access•Jarrod D Hadfield•Journal of Statistical Software•2010

  • Statistical Inference about Markov Chains

    Open Access•T W Anderson, Leo A Goodman•The Annals of Mathematical…•1957

  • Approximate Inference in Generalized Linear Mixed Models

    N E Breslow, David Clayton et al.•Journal of the American…•1993

  • Why Did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective

    Daron Acemoglu, J A Robinson•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2000

  • Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models

    Open Access•Jushan Bai, Pierre Perron•Journal of Applied Econometrics•2003

  • Why did the Elites Extend the Suffrage? Democracy and the Scope of Government, with an Application to Britain's "Age of Reform"

    Alessandro Lizzeri, Nicola Persico•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2004

  • British Historical Facts 1760–1830

    Open Access•Chris Cook, John Stevenson•British Historical Facts 1760–1830•1980

  • Patterns of democracy

    Laura Morales Diez De Ulzurrun•Choice Reviews Online•2000

  • The Political Consequences of Franchise Extension

    Samuel Berlinski, Torun Dewan•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2011

  • Democracy and Elections

    Open Access•Leon D Epstein•Political Science Quarterly•1984

  • Constitutions and Commitment

    Open Access•Douglass C North, Barry R Weingast•The Journal of Economic History•1989

  • Democracy and elections

    David Childs•International Affairs•1986

  • The House of Commons in the 1840's1

    Open Access•William O Aydelotte•History•1954

  • The Growth of Ministerial Control in the Nineteenth–Century House of Commons

    Peter Fraser•The English Historical Review•1960

  • British Parliamentary Election Results 1885–1918

    Open Access•F W S Craig•British Parliamentary Election…•1974

  • Job Market Signaling

    Michael Spence•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1973

  • Text as Data

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer, Brandon M Stewart et al.•Political Analysis•2013

  • Partisanship and Dissidence in the Nineteenth-Century House of Commons

    Hugh Berrington•Parliamentary Affairs•1968

  • Parliamentary Questions, Oversight, and National Opposition Status intheEuropeanParliament

    Open Access•Christian B Jensen, Christian Jensen et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Mapping the Political World of 1861

    Open Access•Valerie Cromwell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1982

  • Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies

    Open Access•Kaare W Strøm, Kaare Strom•European Journal of Political…•2000

  • Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics

    Kathleen Thelen, Kathy Thelen•Annual Review of Political Science•1999

  • Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons

    John R Hibbing•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • Democratic Transitions

    Open Access•David Epstein, David L Epstein et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Causal Heterogeneity in Comparative Research

    B Western•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech

    Open Access•Sven-Oliver Proksch, Sven‐oliver Proksch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs

    Open Access•Kevin M Quinn, Burt L Monroe et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867-1998

    Open Access•Eric Schickler•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies

    Open Access•Torun Dewan, Arthur Spirling•American Political Science Review•2011

  • The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Centripetal Democratic Governance

    Open Access•John Gerring, Strom C Thacker et al.•American Political Science Review•2005

  • A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change

    Open Access•Avner Greif, David D Laitin•American Political Science Review•2004

  • Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms

    Open Access•Peter A Hall, Rosemary C R Taylor•Political Studies•1996

  • Voting Patterns in the British House of Commons in the 1840s

    Open Access•William O Aydelotte•Comparative Studies in Society…•1963

Unique citing works29
Citations per year2,64
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 29

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae