Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice

Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789-1990

Bibliographic Data

ID3589394
AuthorsSarah A Binder, Sarah Binder (0000-0002-9489-6551, Brookings Institution, corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume90
Issue1
Pages8-20
Publication date1996-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2082794
OpenAlexW2319222574
LanguageEN
Citations received68
References cited39

Conventional accounts of the institutional development of Congress suggest that expansion of the size and workload of the House led members to distribute parliamentary rights narrowly: Majority party leaders accrued strong procedural powers while minority parties lost many of their parliamentary rights. I offer an alternative, partisan basis of procedural choice. Using an original data set of changes in House rules, I present a statistical model to assess the influence of partisan and nonpartisan factors on changes in minority procedural rights in the House between 1789 and 1990. I find that short-term partisan goals-constrained by inherited rules-shape both the creation and suppression of rights for partisan and political minorities. Collective institutional concerns and longer-term calculations about future parliamentary needs have little impact on changes in minority rights. The findings have important theoretical implications for explaining both the development of Congress and the nature of institutional change more generally

Economics · Institutional change · Law and economics · Minority rights · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Set (abstract data type · Workload · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • The American Congress Reader

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith et al.•American Congress Reader•2008

  • Party Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith•Party Influence in Congress•2007

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Assessing the Effects of Personal Characteristics and Context on U.S. House Speakers’ Leadership Styles, 1789-2006

    Open Access•John E Owens, Scot Schraufnagel et al.•SAGE Open•2016

  • Konzeptionalisierung und Messung formalen Institutionenwandels – Das Beispiel parlamentarische Regeln

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, PETER MEIßNER et al.•Zeitschrift für Vergleichende…•2014

  • The Party Politics of Military Intervention in Australia and Executive Prerogatives

    Open Access•Falk Ostermann•Foreign Policy Analysis•2024

  • Presidentialization and Procedural Rules Change

    Open Access•Hojun Lee•Journal of East Asian Studies•2019

  • Fair Play in Assemblies

    Michael Gibilisco•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • Governing Through Gridlock

    Open Access•Alison W Craig•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2023

  • Studying Rules Changes in the U.S. House

    Hong Min Park•Congress & the Presidency•2015

  • Party Government in the House Reconsidered

    Eric Schickler, Andrew Rich•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Last-period problems in legislatures

    Open Access•Glenn R Parker, Matthew S Dabros•Public Choice•2012

  • Viva Voce

    Open Access•Michael S Lynch, Anthony J Madonna•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • How Coalitions Shape Legislative Institutions in Parliamentary Democracies

    Radoslaw Zubek•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Do party system parameters explain differences in legislative organization? Fragmentation, polarization, and the density of regulation in European parliaments, 1945–2009

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, Daniel Höhmann•Party Politics•2022

  • Mapping and Explaining Parliamentary Rule Changes in Europe

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, PETER MEIßNER et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Negative Agenda Control and Executive–Legislative Relations in East Central Europe, 1997–2008

    Radoslaw Zubek•Journal of Legislative Studies•2011

  • Democracy in parliament vs. democracy through parliament? Defining the rules of the game in the European Parliament

    Nathan Brack, Olivier Costa•Journal of Legislative Studies•2018

  • Going on record

    Open Access•Stefan Thierse•European Union Politics•2016

  • Going institutional’ to overcome obstruction

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, JULIA F DUTKOWSKI et al.•European Journal of Political…•2020

  • The Political Dynamics of Portfolio Design in European Democracies

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, Thomas M Meyer et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Representation by Deliberation

    Evelyn C Fink•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Ideological Polarization and the Vanishing of Marginals

    Jeffrey W Ladewig•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Formal and Perceived Leadership Power in U.S. State Legislatures

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2011

  • Why Information? Choosing Committee Informativeness in U.S. State Legislatures

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Legislative Structure

    Open Access•C Lawrence Evans, Ceryn Evans•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Paradoxes of Parties in Congress

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • War for the Floor

    Open Access•Charles J Finocchiaro, David W Rohde•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Party Pressure in the U.S. State Legislatures

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista, Jesse Richman et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Advice and Consent

    Nolan Mccarty, Rose Razaghian•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Electoral Incentives and Individual Parliament Members’ Rights

    Yael Shomer•West European Politics•2015

  • Institutional change in parliament through cross-border partisan emulation

    Roman Senninger•West European Politics•2020

  • Explaining Reforms of Parliamentary Minority Rights

    Ulrich Sieberer, Wolfgang C Müller•West European Politics•2015

  • Reforming the Rules of the Parliamentary Game

    Ulrich Sieberer, Wolfgang C Müller et al.•West European Politics•2011

  • Comparing Floor-Dominated and Party-Dominated Explanations of Policy Change in the House of Representatives

    Cary R Covington, Andrew A Bargen et al.•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Political Goals and Procedural Choice in the Senate

    Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder et al.•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Rational Choice and Interpretive Evidence

    Open Access•Iain Hampsher‐monk, Iain Hampsher-Monk et al.•Political Studies•2010

  • A Theory of Competitive Partisan Lawmaking

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel, Adam Meirowitz et al.•Political Science Research and…•2015

  • Trust Is Good, Control Is Better

    Open Access•Audrey André, Sam Depauw et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Explaining Legislative Leadership Influence

    Open Access•Christopher Z Mooney•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Measuring Polarization with Text Analysis

    Open Access•Niels D Goet•Political Analysis•2019

  • At the Crossroads

    Ira Katznelson, John S Lapinski•Perspectives on Politics•2006

  • What explains party unity? A test of competing theories

    Open Access•Jacob Holt•Party Politics•2023

  • In pursuit of power

    Open Access•Jeremy Gelman•Party Politics•2019

  • Parliamentary Procedure under Theresa May

    Open Access•Thomas G Fleming•Parliamentary Affairs•2021

  • The Logic of Legislative Leadership

    Open Access•Jesse Richman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Party Differentiation in Congress

    Open Access•William R Lowry, Charles R Shipan•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2002

  • Procedural Change in the UK House of Commons, 1811–2015

    Open Access•Niels D Goet, Thomas G Fleming et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • A Race for the Regs

    Open Access•Jason A Macdonald, Robert J Mcgrath•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • How Strong Should Our Party Be? Party Member Preferences Over Party Cohesion

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Elizabeth Bergman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Circumventing Legislative Committees

    Open Access•Nicholas O Howard, Mark E Owens et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • The Publication of Precedents and Its Effect on Legislative Behavior

    Open Access•Eric D Lawrence, Eric Lawrence•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Partisanship, Sophistication, and Public Attitudes about Majority Rule and Minority Rights in Congress

    Open Access•Hong Min Park, Stephanie S Smith et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Partisan Stacking on Legislative Committees

    Open Access•Ronald D Hedlund, Kevin Coombs et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • The Legislative Median and Partisan Policy

    Open Access•Alan E Wiseman, John Wright et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2008

  • Investigating the Dynamics of Political Compromise

    Open Access•Alan E Wiseman•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2005

  • US congressional committees

    Colton C Campbell, Roger H Davidson et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•1998

  • Rethinking the Decentralization of Legislative Organization and its Implications for Policymaking

    Open Access•Isaac Shih-Hao Huang, Shing-Yuan Sheng•Government and Opposition•2022

  • Controlling the Floor

    Eric Schickler, Andrew Rich•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship

    Keith Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems

    Open Access•Andrew C Eggers, Arthur Spirling•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Toward a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes

    Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Partisan Context and Procedural Values

    Open Access•Daniel Berliner•British Journal of Political…•2022

  • The Politics of Procedural Choice

    Open Access•Niels D Goet•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Parties and Procedural Choice in the House Rules Committee

    Kenneth W Moffett•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • The Nuclear Option for Stopping Filibusters

    Open Access•Robert Klotz•PS Political Science & Politics•2004

  • Ideology and strategic party disloyalty in the US house of representatives

    Open Access•Justin H Kirkland, Jonathan B Slapin et al.•Electoral Studies•2017

  • Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867-1998

    Open Access•Eric Schickler•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Reconstruction

    Eric Foner•Reconstruction•2005

  • Playing by the Rules

    Frederick Schauer•Playing by the Rules•1993

  • Institutions and Social Conflict

    Open Access•Jack Knight•Institutions and Social Conflict•1992

  • Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making

    D Brady, David W Brady•Critical Elections and…•1988

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models

    John Aldrich, John H Aldrich et al.•Linear Probability, Logit, and…•1984

  • The Transformation of the U.S. Senate

    Barbara Sinclair•The transformation of the U.S.…•1990

  • Home Style and Washington Work

    Open Access•Morris Fiorina, David Rohde et al.•Home Style and Washington Work•1989

  • The historical atlas of political parties in the United States Congress, 1789–1989

    Open Access•Julian Archer, J Clark Archer•Journal of Historical Geography•1990

  • My Quarter Century of American Politics

    LLNL Blair S, Champ Clark•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1920

  • History and Procedure of the House of Representatives

    John A Fairlie, De Alva Stanwood Alexander•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1917

  • History of Legislative Methods in the Period before 1825

    John Ely Briggs, Ralph Volney Harlow•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1918

  • The Decline of Party in the U. S. House of Representatives, 1887-1968

    Open Access•D Brady, David W Brady et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Nelson W Polsby•American Political Science Review•1968

  • Partisanship and Procedural Choice

    Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • The Speaker of the House of Representatives

    Dell G Hitchner•Parliamentary Affairs•1959

  • Bill Introduction in the Nineteenth Century

    Open Access•Joseph Cooper, Cheryl D Young•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1989

  • Suspension of the Rules, the Order of Business, and the Development of Congressional Procedure

    Open Access•Stanley Bach•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Emergence of Legislative Institutions

    Open Access•Gerald Gamm, Kenneth A Shepsle et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1989

  • Measuring Legislative Potential for Policy Change

    Open Access•Patricia A Hurley, Patricia Hurley et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1977

  • Studying Institutions

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1989

  • Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models

    Kenneth A Shepsle•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • The institutionalization of the good death

    Open Access•Beverley Mcnamara, Charles Waddell et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1994

  • Institutional Context and Leadership Style

    Open Access•Joseph Cooper, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•1981

  • The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle, Barry R Weingast•American Political Science Review•1987

  • The Civil Rights Act of 1875

    Bertram Wyatt-Brown, Bertram Wyatt‐brown•The Western Political Quarterly•1965

  • Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions

    Open Access•William H Riker•American Political Science Review•1980

  • Assessing the Potential for Significant Legislative Output in the House of Representatives

    Patricia A Hurley•The Western Political Quarterly•1979

  • Careerism, Committee Assignments, and the Electoral Connection

    Open Access•Jonathan Ned Katz, Brian R Sala•American Political Science Review•1996

Unique citing works68
Citations per year2,34
Citation span1997 - 2024 (28)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 68

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae