Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What explains party unity? A test of competing theories

Bibliographic Data

ID6316348
AuthorsJacob Holt (0000-0001-6457-5856, Politics, Public Administration, and Philosophy, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA, USA, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume29
Issue2
Pages294-305
Publication date2023-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/13540688211064601
OpenAlexW4205892365
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited34

Several theories have been created to explain party unity in Congress, but previous studies have generally assumed the same factors affect party unity for both parties. Given the differences between the two parties (the ideological heterogeneity of their electoral coalitions, how the party’s electoral coalitions view partisanship, etc.), this assumption may limit our understanding of the sources of party unity. In this paper, I test three theories of party unity (cartel theory, Conditional Party Government, and Strategic Party Government) on separate panels for the two parties. I find cartel theory helps explain party unity for both parties, but, unlike what has previously been argued, I find this is not entirely due to Reed’s Rules. I further find Conditional Party Government better explains party unity for the Republicans, while Strategic Party Government better explains party unity for the Democrats. I provide theoretical reasons for these findings and how they may impact future research

Cartel · Divided government · Economics · Government (linguistics · Ideology · Incentive · Law and economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Test (biology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

  • What Explains Party Unity? Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures

    Open Access•Nicholas O Howard, Tessa Provins•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • THe winning of the midwest

    R Jensen•THe winning of the midwest•1971

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • Party Loyalty Among Congressmen

    David R Mayhew•Party Loyalty among Congressmen•1966

  • Asymmetric Politics

    Matthew Grossmann, Matt Grossman et al.•Asymmetric politics•2016

  • A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix

    Whitney K Newey, Kenneth D West•Econometrica•1987

  • Social science history

    Jeremy Baskes•Staying Afloat•2020

  • Beyond Ideology

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Beyond Ideology•2009

  • It's Even Worse Than It Looks

    Open Access•Gerald M Pomper•Political Science Quarterly•2013

  • The Third Electoral System, 1853-1892

    Michael F Holt, Paul Kleppner•The Journal of Southern History•1980

  • Measuring variations in party unity voting

    Open Access•Michael H Crespin, David W Rohde et al.•Party Politics•2013

  • The Decline of Party in the U. S. House of Representatives, 1887-1968

    Open Access•D Brady, David W Brady et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • War for the Floor

    Open Access•Charles J Finocchiaro, David W Rohde•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Majority Party Leadership Strategies for Coping with the New U. S. House

    Open Access•Barbara Sinclair•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1981

  • Dividers, Not Uniters

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Emergence of Strong Leadership in the 1980s House of Representatives

    Barbara Sinclair•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Conditional Party Government and the Homogeneity of Constituent Interests

    Jeffrey W Ladewig•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Reed's Rules and the Partisan Theory of Legislative Organization

    Richard Forgette, Richard G Forgette•Polity•1997

  • Partisan Polarization and the Effect of Congressional Performance Evaluations on Party Brands and American Elections

    Open Access•David R Jones•Political Research Quarterly•2015

  • Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats

    Open Access•Matt Grossmann, David A Hopkins•Perspectives on Politics•2015

  • The adoption of direct primaries in the United States

    Open Access•Eric Lawrence, Todd Donovan et al.•Party Politics•2013

  • How Strong Should Our Party Be? Party Member Preferences Over Party Cohesion

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Elizabeth Bergman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting

    Open Access•Eric D Lawrence, Eric Lawrence et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Where's the Party

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties

    Open Access•Jo Freeman•Political Science Quarterly•1986

  • The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Asymmetry in the Political System

    Open Access•David Nexon•American Political Science Review•1971

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae