Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making the other side mad

How out‐group distaste benefits less competent candidates

Bibliographic Data

ID6231701
AuthorsJoshua A Strayhorn (0000-0001-6808-4608, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science University of Colorado at Boulder Boulder Colorado USA, corresponding author)
Year2025
Publication date2025-02-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajps.12948
OpenAlexW4407182002
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited62

I present a formal model of candidate evaluation in a context where voters within some group or political party learn information about to what extent various in‐group candidates (such as a slate of primary candidates) are disliked by an out‐group or opposing party. Thus, a voter's candidate evaluation is based in part on how they process information about which of their own candidates provoke particularly strong distaste from the out‐group. I show that exposure to information about out‐group distaste can cause voters to make misleading inferences about candidate characteristics, causing them to sometimes systematically prefer lower competence candidates. These effects are stronger for certain kinds of low‐information voters, and for more ideologically motivated voters. The model can thus explain under what conditions voters will support politicians who particularly aggrieve the opposition. This can also create secondary incentives for politicians to signal incompetence

Group (periodic table · Chemistry · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics

  • Defensible Democratic Meritocracy

    Open Access•Zhichao Tong, Zhi-Chao Tong•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Citizens, Politics and Social Communication

    Open Access•R Robert Huckfeldt, Robert Huckfeldt et al.•Citizens, Politics and Social…•1995

  • Asymmetric Politics

    Matthew Grossmann, Matt Grossman et al.•Asymmetric politics•2016

  • Bad politicians

    Open Access•FRANCESCO CASELLI, Massimo Morelli•Journal of Public Economics•2004

  • Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jaime E Settle et al.•Nature•2023

  • Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians

    Open Access•James D Fearon•Democracy, Accountability, and…•1999

  • Elections with platform and valence competition

    Open Access•Scott Ashworth, Ethan Bueno De Mesquita•Games and Economic Behavior•2009

  • Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability

    Timothy Besley, Andrea Prat•American Economic Review•2006

  • Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate

    Open Access•Enriqueta Aragones, Thomas R Palfrey•Journal of Economic Theory•2002

  • Tweeting From Left to Right

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá et al.•Psychological Science•2015

  • Preelection Selective Exposure

    Open Access•Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia Knobloch‐westerwick et al.•Communication Research•2012

  • Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

    Open Access•Eytan Bakshy, Messing et al.•Science•2015

  • Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization

    Open Access•Christopher A Bail, Chris Bail et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Hearing the Other Side

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Hearing the Other Side•2006

  • Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization

    Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2024

  • How Right-Wing Populists Instrumentalize News Media

    Open Access•Marcus Maurer, Pablo Jost et al.•The International Journal of…•2022

  • How Cross-Cutting News Exposure Relates to Candidate Issue Stance Knowledge, Political Polarization, and Participation

    Open Access•Yonghwan Kim•International Journal of Public…•2018

  • Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates

    Open Access•Rune Karlsen, Kari Steen-Johnsen et al.•European Journal of Communication•2017

  • Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Public Choice•2000

  • Voting to anger and to please others

    Open Access•Amihai Glazer•Public Choice•2008

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven Webster et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Delegation and Accountability

    Justin Fox, Stuart V Jordan•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • The Parties in Our Heads

    Douglas J Ahler, Gaurav Sood•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • The Value of Biased Information

    Randall L Calvert•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition

    James M Enelow, Melvin J Hinich•The Journal of Politics•1982

  • Electoral Competition with Primaries and Quality Asymmetries

    B Grofman, Orestis Troumpounis et al.•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • Delegates or Trustees? A Theory of Political Accountability

    Justin Fox, Kenneth W Shotts•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Is Polarization a Myth

    Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Ideologues without Issues

    Open Access•L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • Candidate traits in elections

    Open Access•Keith E Schnakenberg, Keith Schnakenberg•Political Science Research and…•2021

  • Emotion, Motivation, and Social Information Seeking About Politics

    Jeffrey Lyons, A E Sokhey et al.•Political Communication•2014

  • How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Joseph L Sutherland•Political Behavior•2016

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Polarizing Cues

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Learning about Voter Rationality

    Open Access•Scott Ashworth, Ethan Bueno De Mesquita et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression

    Open Access•Paul Goren, Christopher M Federico et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Candidate and Party Strategies in Two‐Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary

    Open Access•James Adams, James E Adams et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage

    Tim Groseclose•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Keeping Your Friends Close and Your Enemies Closer? Information Networks in Legislative Politics

    Open Access•Nils Ringe, Jennifer Nicoll Victor et al.•British Journal of Political…•2013

  • Party Cues in the News

    Open Access•Eric Merkley, Dominik A Stecuła•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • I Disrespectfully Agree

    Open Access•L Mason•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Political Polarization in the American Public

    Morris P Fiorina, Samuel J Abram et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Interventions to reduce partisan animosity

    Open Access•Roger Hartman, Will Blakey et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

  • Motivated Reasoning and Democratic Accountability

    Open Access•Andrew T Little, Keith E Schnakenberg et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Partisan Affect and Elite Polarization

    Open Access•Daniel Diermeier, Christopher Li•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Spatial Models of Party Competition

    Open Access•Donald E Stokes, Donald Stokes•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Activating Animus

    Open Access•L Mason, Julie Wronski et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett, Shira Dvir Gvirsman et al.•Human Communication Research•2014

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae