Making the other side mad
How out‐group distaste benefits less competent candidates
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6231701 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joshua A Strayhorn (0000-0001-6808-4608, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science University of Colorado at Boulder Boulder Colorado USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ajps.12948 |
| OpenAlex | W4407182002 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 62 |
I present a formal model of candidate evaluation in a context where voters within some group or political party learn information about to what extent various in‐group candidates (such as a slate of primary candidates) are disliked by an out‐group or opposing party. Thus, a voter's candidate evaluation is based in part on how they process information about which of their own candidates provoke particularly strong distaste from the out‐group. I show that exposure to information about out‐group distaste can cause voters to make misleading inferences about candidate characteristics, causing them to sometimes systematically prefer lower competence candidates. These effects are stronger for certain kinds of low‐information voters, and for more ideologically motivated voters. The model can thus explain under what conditions voters will support politicians who particularly aggrieve the opposition. This can also create secondary incentives for politicians to signal incompetence
Group (periodic table · Chemistry · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics
Citizens, Politics and Social Communication
Asymmetric Politics
Bad politicians
Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing
Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians
Elections with platform and valence competition
Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate
Tweeting From Left to Right
Preelection Selective Exposure
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
An economic theory of democracy
Hearing the Other Side
Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
How Right-Wing Populists Instrumentalize News Media
How Cross-Cutting News Exposure Relates to Candidate Issue Stance Knowledge, Political Polarization, and Participation
Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates
Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models
Voting to anger and to please others
The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century
Delegation and Accountability
The Parties in Our Heads
The Value of Biased Information
Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition
Electoral Competition with Primaries and Quality Asymmetries
Delegates or Trustees? A Theory of Political Accountability
Is Polarization a Myth
Ideologues without Issues
Candidate traits in elections
Emotion, Motivation, and Social Information Seeking About Politics
How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines
Polarizing Cues
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Learning about Voter Rationality
Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression
Candidate and Party Strategies in Two‐Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary
A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage
Keeping Your Friends Close and Your Enemies Closer? Information Networks in Legislative Politics
Party Cues in the News
I Disrespectfully Agree
Political Polarization in the American Public
Affect, Not Ideology
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America
Motivated Reasoning and Democratic Accountability
Partisan Affect and Elite Polarization
Spatial Models of Party Competition
Activating Animus
Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |