Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Achilles Heel of Plurality Systems

Geography and Representation in Multiparty Democracies

Bibliographic Data

ID6232484
AuthorsE Calvo (0000-0001-5770-1391, University of Maryland), Judith Rodden (0000-0003-1449-8527, Stanford University), Jonathan Rodden
Year2015
Volume59
Issue4
Pages789-805
Publication date2015-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajps.12167
OpenAlexW1573770346
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited25

Building on the unfinished research program of Gudgin and Taylor (1979), we analytically derive the linkage between a party's territorial distribution of support and the basic features of its vote‐seat curve. We then demonstrate the usefulness of the corresponding empirical model with an analysis of elections in postwar Great Britain, focusing in particular on the transformation of the Liberals from a territorially concentrated to a dispersed party in the 1970s. We show that majoritarian biases increase with the number of parties, and majoritarian systems harm small parties when their vote is more dispersed than average, and large parties when their vote is more concentrated than average. Moreover, the evolving experiences of Labour and Conservatives demonstrate how a party's territorial support, and hence its expected seat premium or penalty, changes with its electoral fortunes. This model has a wide variety of applications in multiparty majoritarian democracies around the world

Distribution (mathematics · Economics · Harm · Linkage (software · Political economy · Political science · Representation (politics · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Social Capital and Networks · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Electoral Systems, Regional Resentment and the Surprising Success of Anglo-American Populism

    Jason Spicer•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2018

  • Inequalities in place‐based representation

    Open Access•MAFALDA PRATAS, Jorge M Fernandes et al.•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • Budgetary Clientelism and Decentralization in Hungary and Romania

    Open Access•Gherghina, Sergiu Gherghina et al.•Journal of Developing Societies•2023

  • Pot and ladle

    Open Access•Jarosław Flis, Wojciech Słomczyński et al.•Public Choice•2020

  • The Effects of Exposure to New Electoral Rules

    Open Access•AVI AHUJA, Gwyneth Mcclendon•American Political Science Review•2026

  • Bonuses and penalties in vote to seat conversion under single-member plurality electoral rules in a cross-national perspective

    Open Access•Grigorii V Golosov•Acta Politica•2026

  • National Electoral Thresholds and Disproportionality

    Open Access•Tasos Kalandrakis, Miguel R Rueda•Political Analysis•2020

  • The Burden of Election Logistics

    Santiago Alle, Santiago Alles et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Designing Electoral Districts for Proportional Representation Systems

    Alex Walter, André Walter et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Democratic Institutions and Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•David Altman, P Flavin et al.•Political Studies•2017

  • Implementing Partisan Symmetry

    Open Access•Daryl Deford, Natasha Dhamankar et al.•Political Analysis•2023

  • Partisan Gerrymandering and Political Science

    Open Access•Eric Mcghee•Annual Review of Political Science•2020

  • Components of partisan bias originating from single-member districts in multi-party systems

    Open Access•Eric Magar, Alejandro Trelles et al.•Political Geography•2017

  • Vox Populi

    Open Access•Lucas Leemann, Patrick Emmenegger et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Electoral Reform and Trade-Offs in Representation

    Open Access•Marlis Becher, Irene Menéndez González•American Political Science Review•2019

  • The role of electoral geography in the territorialization of party systems

    Open Access•Carolina De Miguel•Electoral Studies•2017

  • The strategic effect of the plurality vote at the district level

    Open Access•Daniel Bochsler•Electoral Studies•2017

  • Local ethno-political polarization and election violence in majoritarian vs. proportional systems

    Open Access•Carl Müller-Crepon•Journal of Peace Research•2022

  • (Under What Conditions) Do Politicians Reward Their Supporters? Evidence from Kenya's Constituencies Development Fund

    Open Access•J Andrew Harris, Daniel N Posner et al.•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Seats, Votes, and the Spatial Organization of Elections

    Graham Gudgin•Seats, Votes, and the Spatial…•1980

  • Elections in Western Europe since 1815

    Open Access•Daniele Caramani•Elections In Western Europe…•2000

  • Electoral Distortion in New Zealand

    Open Access•R H Brookes•Australian Journal of Politics &…•1959

  • The Vicious Cycle

    James J Feigenbaum, Cameron A Shelton•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2011

  • Unintentional Gerrymandering

    Jowei Chen, Judith Rodden•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2013

  • The Analysis of Distorted Representation in Two-Party Single-Member Elections

    Open Access•R H Brookes•Political Science•1960

  • Nationwide threshold of representation

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•Electoral Studies•2002

  • The Competitive Road to Proportional Representation

    Open Access•E Calvo•World Politics•2009

  • Unequal and Unequally Distributed Votes

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, Galina Borisyuk et al.•Political Studies•2012

  • The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Multiparty Systems

    Open Access•Drew A Linzer•Political Analysis•2012

  • The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems

    Mark P Jones, Scott Mainwaring•Party Politics•2003

  • Electoral Responsiveness and Partisan Bias in Multiparty Democracies

    Open Access•Gary King•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Manipulating maps and winning elections

    Open Access•Ron Johnston•Political Geography•2002

  • Sources of partisan bias in US congressional elections

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson•Political Geography•2002

  • The Law of the Cubic Proportion in Election Results

    M G Kendall, Alfred Allen Stuart et al.•British Journal of Sociology•1950

  • The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems

    Open Access•Edward R Tufte•American Political Science Review•1973

  • An integrated perspective on the three potential sources of partisan bias

    Open Access•B Grofman, William Koetzle et al.•Electoral Studies•1997

  • Integrating and decomposing the sources of partisan bias

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, David Rossiter et al.•Electoral Studies•1999

  • Empirical threshold of representation

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•Electoral Studies•1989

  • Reformulating the Cube Law for Proportional Representation Elections

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Democratic Representation and Partisan Bias in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Gary King, Robert Browning et al.•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Predicting the Number of Parties

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera, Matthew Soberg Shugart•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Seats and votes

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•Social Science Research•1973

Unique citing works19
Citations per year2,11
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae