Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Survey Experiments in International Political Economy

What We (Don't) Know About the Backlash Against Globalization

Bibliographic Data

ID6232815
AuthorsMegumi Naoi (0000-0002-2717-4743, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0521, USA, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume23
Issue1
Pages333-356
Publication date2020-05-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnual Review of Political Science (BOOK_SERIES)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1094-2939 • E-ISSN: 1545-1577
PublisherAnnual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-063806
OpenAlexW3002726705
LanguageEN
Citations received25
References cited75

This article reviews the cumulation of evidence from survey experiments in the field of international political economy (IPE) and discusses their strengths and weaknesses in explaining the backlash against globalization. I first review the advancements made by the most commonly used survey experiment design in IPE, namely the Globalization-as-Treatment design, in which scholars randomly assign information about different features of globalization and solicit respondents’ attitudes toward protectionism. Then I discuss three issues with this design in addressing key puzzles in the emergence of globalization backlash: ( a) using a coarse informational treatment that stacks the deck against the economic self-interest hypothesis; ( b) overattributing globalization as a source of hardship; and ( c) neglecting heterogeneous room-to-maneuver beliefs across and within countries. The article suggests alternative designs and strategies to study these questions. Evidence from survey experiments suggests that much of the globalization backlash we witness today is deeply rooted in domestic politics

Backlash · Economics · Globalization · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Protectionism · Survey data collection · Witness · World Values Survey · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Political Conflict and Governance

  • Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism

    Open Access•Dani Rodrik•Annual Review of Economics•2021

  • Unequal Democracies

    Open Access•Ruben B Mathisen, Wouter Schakel et al.•Unequal Democracies•2023

  • Perceptions of social credit systems in Southeast Asia

    Open Access•Wiebke Rabe, Genia Kostka•Global Policy•2024

  • Why do people oppose foreign acquisitions? Evidence from Japanese individual-level data

    Open Access•Banri Ito, Ayumu Tanaka et al.•Japan and the World Economy•2023

  • Platforming populism

    Open Access•Jerik Cruz, Eloiza Gabriel da Cruz•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2023

  • Pocketbook versus identity? Farmers’ attitudes towards international trade

    Filip Viskupič, Evren Celik Wiltse et al.•The Social Science Journal•2022

  • Support for free trade

    Ryo Nakai•Journal of Baltic Studies•2024

  • When Generalized Trust Matters? Impact of Industrial Tertiarization on Trade Preference Formation

    Open Access•Masafumi Fujita•International Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Geography of Grievance

    Open Access•Sung Eun Kim, Krzysztof J Pelc•International Organization•2026

  • Domestic Institutions, Geographic Concentration, and Agricultural Liberalization

    Open Access•In Song Kim, Megumi Naoi et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Enter the trade war? European public opinion on trade restrictions against China

    Open Access•Marius Dotzauer, Paul Meiners•Review of International Political…•2026

  • Backlash and Judicial Restraint

    Open Access•Øyvind Stiansen, Erik Voeten•International Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Testing the backlash argument

    Alexander Kustov•Journal of European Public Policy•2022

  • Political Trust and American Public Support for Free Trade

    Open Access•David Macdonald•Political Behavior•2024

  • Another Day, Another Currency

    Open Access•Brett R Bessen, Brendan J Connell•Political Behavior•2024

  • Environmental Concern Leads to Trade Skepticism on the Political Left and Right

    Open Access•Lukas Rudolph, Franziska Quoß et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Relative Gains in the Shadow of a Trade War

    Open Access•Eddy S F Yeung, Kai Quek•International Organization•2022

  • Ordinary Patterns in an Extraordinary Crisis

    Open Access•Tana Johnson•International Organization•2020

  • Great power dynamics and international economic cooperation

    Open Access•Quynh Nguyen, Thomas Sattler et al.•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • The Globalization Backlash

    Open Access•Edward D Mansfield, Helen V Milner et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2021

  • Automation, Digitalization, and Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace

    Open Access•Aina Gallego, Thomas Kurer•Annual Review of Political Science•2022

  • The Backlash Against Globalization

    Open Access•Stefanie Walter•Annual Review of Political Science•2021

  • Target, Information, and Trade Preferences

    Open Access•Sung Eun Kim, Jong Hee Park et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • The Wrong Winners

    Open Access•Ajit Menon, Iain Osgood•British Journal of Political…•2024

  • Inflation, Blame Attribution, and the 2022 US Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Leonardo Baccini, Stephen Weymouth•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • The Politics of Market Discipline in Latin America

    Open Access•Daniela Campello•Politics of Market Discipline in…•2015

  • American Opinion on Trade

    Alexandra Guisinger•American opinion on trade•2017

  • The Economic Vote

    Open Access•Raymond M Duch, Raymond Duch et al.•Economic Vote•2008

  • The IMF and Economic Development

    Open Access•James Raymond Vreeland•IMF and Economic Development•2003

  • Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure

    David Autor, David Dorn et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•2016

  • The Wage Effects of Offshoring

    David Hummels, Rasmus Jørgensen et al.•American Economic Review•2014

  • Do concerns about labor market competition shape attitudes toward immigration? New evidence

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, Michael J Hiscox et al.•Journal of International Economics•2015

  • The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity

    Open Access•Marc J Melitz•Econometrica•2003

  • Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • The China Syndrome

    David H Autor, David Autor et al.•American Economic Review•2013

  • Cultural Backlash

    Open Access•P Norris, Ronald Inglehart•Cultural Backlash•2019

  • Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis

    Open Access•Sascha O Becker, Thiemo Fetzer et al.•Economic Policy•2017

  • The Economic Analysis of Immigration

    Open Access•George J Borjas•Handbook of labor economics•1999

  • Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism

    James Andreoni, Lise Vesterlund•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2001

  • The Politics of Resentment

    Katherine J Cramer•Politics of Resentment•2015

  • Public Finance and Individual Preferences Over Globalization Strategies

    Open Access•Gordon H Hanson, Gordon Hanson et al.•Economics and Politics•2007

  • On the Precipice of a “Majority-Minority” America

    Open Access•Maureen A Craig, Jennifer A Richeson•Psychological Science•2014

  • French Roast

    Sonal S Pandya, Rajkumar Venkatesan•The Review of Economics and…•2016

  • The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale

    Open Access•Philip T Dunwoody, Friedrich Funke•Journal of Social and Political…•2016

  • Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics

    John G Bullock, Alan S Gerber et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2013

  • The threat of increasing diversity

    Open Access•Brenda Major, Alison Blodorn et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2016

  • From Tiananmen to Outsourcing

    J Kuk, John Seungmin Kuk et al.•Journal of Contemporary China•2017

  • Compensating the Losers

    Stephanie J Rickard•International Interactions•2014

  • Nativism or Economic Threat

    Judith L Goldstein, Mary Eleanor Peters•International Interactions•2014

  • Preferences for International Redistribution

    Open Access•Michael M Bechtel, Jens Hainmueller et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It

    Open Access•Jacob M Montgomery, Brendan Nyhan et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Race, Paternalism, and Foreign Aid

    Open Access•Andy Baker•American Political Science Review•2015

  • US versus Them

    Open Access•Edward D Mansfield, Diana C Mutz•World Politics•2013

  • Welfare versus Subsidies

    Stephanie J Rickard•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Causal Attribution and Economic Voting in American Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Brad T Gomez, J Matthew Wilson•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, D J Hopkins et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • Economic Crisis, Globalization, and Partisan Bias

    Open Access•Jose Fernandez-Albertos, Andrew Kuo et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Firms and Global Value Chains

    Open Access•In Song Kim, Helen V Milner et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Lost in Globalization

    Open Access•Yotam Margalit•International Studies Quarterly•2012

  • The American Public and the Room to Maneuver

    Open Access•Timothy Hellwig, Timothy T Hellwig et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Winners and Losers in International Trade

    Open Access•J Bradford Jensen, Dennis P Quinn et al.•International Organization•2017

  • Who Controls Foreign Aid? Elite versus Public Perceptions of Donor Influence in Aid-Dependent Uganda

    Open Access•Michael G Findley, A S Harris et al.•International Organization•2017

  • Explaining Mass Support for Agricultural Protectionism

    Open Access•Megumi Naoi, Ikuo Kume•International Organization•2011

  • Through a Glass and Darkly

    Michael J Hiscox, Michael Hiscox•International Organization•2006

  • The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz, Eunji Kim•International Organization•2017

  • Support for Free Trade

    Open Access•Edward D Mansfield, Diana C Mutz•International Organization•2009

  • Learning to Love Globalization

    Jens Hainmueller, Michael J Hiscox et al.•International Organization•2006

  • Sensitivity to Issue Framing on Trade Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Martin Ardanaz, María Victoria Murillo et al.•International Organization•2013

  • Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest

    Open Access•Sungmin Rho, Michael Tomz•International Organization•2017

  • Occupation and the Political Economy of Trade

    Open Access•Erica Owens, Erica Owen et al.•International Organization•2017

  • Determining Trade Policy

    Open Access•Alexandra Guisinger•International Organization•2009

  • Workers or Consumers? A Survey Experiment on the Duality of Citizens’ Interests in the Politics of Trade

    Open Access•Megumi Naoi, Ikuo Kume•Comparative Political Studies•2015

  • The Economic Origins of Authoritarian Values

    Open Access•Cameron Ballard-Rosa, Mashail Malik et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2021

  • International Constraints and Electoral Decisions

    Open Access•Spyros Kosmidi, Spyros Kosmidis•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Inequity Aversion and the International Distribution of Trade Protection

    Open Access•Xiaobo Lü, Kenneth Scheve et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate

    Brad T Gomez, J Matthew Wilson•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Economic Explanations for Opposition to Immigration

    Open Access•N Malhotra, Yotam Margalit et al.•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • When Are Monetary Policy Preferences Egocentric? Evidence from American Surveys and an Experiment

    Open Access•David H Bearce, Kim-Lee Tuxhorn et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Gregory A Huber•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Hidden American Immigration Consensus

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, D J Hopkins•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • The Political Consequences of External Economic Shocks

    Open Access•John S Ahlquist, John Ahlquist et al.•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Incumbents Beware

    Open Access•Stephanie J Rickard•British Journal of Political…•2022

  • Reciprocity and Public Opposition to Foreign Direct Investment

    Open Access•Adam Chilton, Adam S Chilton et al.•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer)

    John G Bullock, Donald P Green et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

  • A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation

    Ernst Fehr, Kari M Schmidt•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1999

  • International regimes, transactions, and change

    Open Access•John Gerard Ruggie•International Organization•1982

  • Explaining Social Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Yotam Margalit•American Political Science Review•2013

  • Demand Effects in Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Jonathan Mummolo, Erik Peterson•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Unpacking the Black Box of Causality

    Open Access•Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•American Political Science Review•2011

  • Inefficient Redistribution

    Open Access•Daron Acemoglu, James A Robinson•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Global Competition and Brexit

    Open Access•Italo Colantone, Piero Stanig•American Political Science Review•2018

  • Political Cleavages within Industry

    Open Access•In Song Kim•American Political Science Review•2017

  • Benchmarking across Borders

    Open Access•Mark Andreas Kayser, Mark Andreas Lindst Auml Dt Kayser et al.•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, Michael J Hiscox et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

Unique citing works25
Citations per year4,17
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 25

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae