Negative Spotlight
Event-Driven Effects on Support for the Canadian Supreme Court
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6242583 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erin Crandall (0000-0003-0912-2007, Acadia University), Andrea Lawlor (0000-0002-9261-993X, McMaster University), Shauna Hughey (0000-0001-9447-858X, McMaster University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-17 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423925100383 |
| OpenAlex | W4414018354 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 16 |
Longstanding public support for the Supreme Court of Canada is well-documented and contributes to its public legitimacy. However, the sources of this support and how vulnerable it may be to political factors or negative coverage of events are not well understood. In February of 2023, Justice Russell Brown took a leave of absence from the Supreme Court following a conduct complaint under review by the Canadian Judicial Council. Justice Brown retired from the bench in June of that year, before the CJC concluded its investigation. In the intervening period, media coverage of the events that prompted the attention from the CJC thrust the Court into the spotlight. Using data from an original two-wave survey experiment (n = 1,222) from May and November of 2023, we investigate whether perspectives toward the circumstances surrounding Brown’s retirement hurt perceptions of the Court’s legitimacy. We find that the event did not disrupt support for the Court over time but also point to the ways in which opinion toward the Court changed pre- and post-resignation. These findings suggest that support toward Canada’s high court is at present largely stable even in the case of negative coverage of a high-profile event. However, we also acknowledge the potential vulnerabilities that negative coverage of the Court may present
Economics · Event (particle physics · Law and economics · Physics · Political science · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Political Systems and Governance
A Written Constitution for Quebec?
The Canadian Charter’s Notwithstanding Clause as an Institutionalized Mechanism of Court Curbing
Judging Incumbents’ Character
Public Support for Canadian Courts
Public Views of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Aftermath of the Kavanaugh Confirmation
One Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch
Loyalties and interests
The Changing Nature of Public Support for the Supreme Court of Canada
The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court
Delaying Justice(s)
Your Honor’s Misdeeds
Surviving Scandal
Les clivages politiques et le système partisan du Québec au 21 siècle
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |