Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When and Why Do Hedgehogs and Foxes Differ

Bibliographic Data

ID6252298
AuthorsFrank C Keil (0000-0003-3688-7558, Yale University, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume22
Issue4
Pages415-426
Publication date2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08913811.2010.541695
PMID21698070
PMCIDPMC3118600
OpenAlexW2071849905
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited16

Philip E. Tetlock's finding that "hedgehog" experts (those with one big theory) are worse predictors than "foxes" (those with multiple, less comprehensive theories) offers fertile ground for future research. Are experts as likely to exhibit hedgehog- or fox-like tendencies in areas that call for explanatory, diagnostic, and skill-based expertise-as they did when Tetlock called on experts to make predictions? Do particular domains of expertise curtail or encourage different styles of expertise? Can we trace these different styles to childhood? Finally, can we nudge hedgehogs to be more like foxes? Current research can only grope at the answers to these questions, but they are essential to gauging the health of expert political judgment

Biology · Epistemology · Hedgehog · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • The Wise Mind Balances the Abstract and the Concrete

    Open Access•Igor Grossmann, Julia Peetz et al.•Open MIND•2024

  • Doparies

    Open Access•Raffaele Calabretta•SAGE Open•2011

  • What on Earth do Journalists Know? A New Model of Knowledge Brokers’ Expertise

    Open Access•Zvi Reich, Hagar Lahav•Communication Theory•2020

  • Second Thoughts About Expert Political Judgment

    Philip E Tetlock•Critical Review•2010

  • Should “Systems Thinkers” Accept the Limits on Political Forecasting or Push the Limits

    Philip E Tetlock, Michael C Horowitz et al.•Critical Review•2012

  • Politics is too important to be left to political scientists

    Open Access•Lorenzo Zambernardi•European Journal of International…•2016

  • Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development

    Frank C Keil•Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive…•1989

  • The misunderstood limits of folk science

    Open Access•Leonid Rozenblit, Leon Rozenblit et al.•Cognitive Science•2002

  • The Development of Metacognitive Knowledge in Children and Adolescents

    Open Access•Wolfgang Schneider•Mind, Brain, and Education•2008

  • The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations

    Open Access•Deena Skolnick Weisberg, Frank C Keil et al.•Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience•2008

  • Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Raymond S Nickerson•Review of General Psychology•1998

  • Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge

    Open Access•Paul Thagard•Philosophy of Science•2007

  • Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge

    Michelene T Chi, Michelene T H Chi et al.•Developmental Psychology•1983

  • Explanation and Understanding

    Frank C Keil•Annual Review of Psychology•2005

  • Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making

    Open Access•Shane Frederick•The Journal of Economic…•2005

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2010 - 2024 (15)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae