The construction of success in anti-corruption activity in Georgia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6255286 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lili Di Puppo (0000-0002-1976-9827, National Research University Higher School of Economics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 105-122 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | East European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2159-9165 • E-ISSN: 2159-9173 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21599165.2013.846260 |
| OpenAlex | W2022954410 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 10 |
This article examines anti-corruption activities in Georgia after the Rose Revolution of November 2003 under the administration of Mikheil Saakashvili. It aims to analyse the existence of different assessments on the country's success in fighting corruption and applies an interpretive framework to study these assessments as "narratives" that reveal the diverging or converging interests of anti-corruption actors in sustaining a common narrative on the country's reforms. The article examines how the two main anti-corruption actors – the Georgian government and international organisations – frame their activities into two different representations of success and seek a mutual validation on them. It aims to identify the factors underlying a (non)-convergence of these actors into a common representation or an "official transcript" of their activities. The case study of the adoption of a national anti-corruption strategy in Georgia in 2005 reveals the difficulty of these two actors to validate their representations and to sustain a coherent image. Certain inherent contradictions in the relations between donor organisations and transition or developing countries, in particular in the juxtaposition of the two notions of a "transfer of external knowledge" and "local ownership/political will", are viewed as the main factors behind this problem of validation
Convergence (economics · Economic growth · Economics · Georgian · Government (linguistics · Language change · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Representation (politics · Sociology · Corruption and Economic Development · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Natural Resources and Economic Development · Public Administration
“Democracy is the Cure?”
Debt Relations in Georgian Bazaars
Trapped in informality? A study of informal politics in Georgia’s Javakheti
Anticorruption frames
Transboundary processes and (re-)configurations of political space in the Caucasus
If one is Orthodox, one should not strive for luxury”
The role of epistemic communities and expert knowledge in the European Neighbourhood Policy
Years of anti-corruption in Romania
Aiming at the Wrong Targets
Neoclassical realism and small states
Europe, Russia, or both? Popular perspectives on overlapping regionalism in the Southern Caucasus
Fighting Corruption in Public Services
Domination and the Arts of Resistance
Controlling Corruption
What Do African Donor‐sponsored Anti‐corruption Programmes Teach Us about International Development in Africa
Examining the State
Encountering Order and Disjuncture
Assembling International Competitiveness
Corruption and Political Development
Compromising Power
Modernity and Ambivalence
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2023 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |