Towards a theory of reparative multiculturalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6255677 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francis Lambrecht (0000-0002-9883-274X, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 562-582 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethnicities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-7968 • E-ISSN: 1741-2706 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14687968221149740 |
| OpenAlex | W4313523839 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 21 |
Contemporary liberal states must provide an answer to the “question of cultural diversity”, requiring a principled way to determine which minority cultural practices a state must accommodate and support. (Liberal egalitarian) multiculturalism answers this question neatly by creating a dichotomy between national minorities and ethnic minorities (the national/ethnic “dichotomy” ). Where national minorities are entitled to extensive and far-reaching cultural rights, ethnic minorities are entitled to significantly fewer cultural rights and accommodations. This dichotomy is enacted through a distributive logic that allocates cultural rights to achieve equal individual autonomy. But the dichotomy is also influenced by the ways these groups were incorporated into the state. Their modes of incorporation are different and, thus, they have different requirements to achieve equally autonomous lives. Critics have challenged multiculturalism by questioning this dichotomy . They have suggested that the dichotomy does not adequately capture differences in kinds of minority groups and their entitlements. This paper defends the dichotomy by offering a supplementary principle to liberal egalitarian multiculturalism: the reparative multicultural principle. This principle allocates cultural rights as part of reparative entitlements for historical and ongoing injustices committed against minority groups. Supplementing multiculturalism in this way more accurately captures the idea of the historical mode of incorporation that inspires the dichotomy and can help resolve some the objections to multiculturalism
Autonomy · Cultural diversity · Cultural group selection · Diversity (politics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethnic group · Human rights · Law and economics · Liberalism · Minority rights · Multiculturalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Religious Education and Schools · Religious Freedom and Discrimination
Liberalism, community and culture
Symbolic Immortality
Potlatch in Anthropology
Act Consequentialism and the No-Difference Challenge
Liberalism’s Religion
The Cultural Defense of Nations
The Multiculturalism of Fear
Force and Freedom
Corrective vs. Distributive Justice
Superseding Historic Injustice
National Minorities and Ethnic Immigrants
Populist multiculturalism
Liberal Multiculturalism as a Political Theory of State–Minority Relations
A Multicultural Continuum
Towards post-multiculturalism? Changing communities, conditions and contexts of diversity
From multiculturalism to post-multiculturalism
Figurative Repatriation
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |