Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Legitimacy, trust and procedural fairness

Remarks on Marcia Grimes’ study

Bibliographic Data

ID6258752
AuthorsViktoria Kaina (University of Potsdam, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume47
Issue4
Pages510-521
Publication date2008-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Political Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0304-4130 • E-ISSN: 1475-6765
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00773.x
OpenAlexW1974252394
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited17

This article is a reply to Marcia Grimes's 2006 contribution to the European Journal of Political Research entitled ‘Organizing consent: The role of procedural fairness in political trust and compliance’. The remarks focus on two main points. First, the author discusses the conceptual basis of the study, to argue that trust and legitimacy are quite different concepts that should not be used synonymously. In particular, the author challenges the conceptualization of (subjective) legitimacy in that institutional legitimacy is partly defined as institutional trust. Additionally, the author justifies why (institutional) trust should not be treated as a ‘component’ of (institutional) legitimacy. Second, the author deals with a methodological problem in Grimes’ article. This problem refers to the operationalization of norms of fairness in order to examine the influence of perceived fairness in decision processes on citizens’ beliefs of legitimacy. Summing up the author's conceptual and methodological objections, this article offers a somewhat different interpretation of Grimes’ main findings

Compliance (psychology · Conceptualization · Economics · Epistemology · Institutional theory · Interpretation (philosophy · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Operationalization · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Carving Up Concepts? Differentiating Between Trust and Legitimacy in Public Attitudes Towards Legal Authority

    Open Access•Jonathan Jackson, Jacinta M Gau•2016

  • Compliance with the Law in Slovenia

    Open Access•Michael D Reisig, Justice Tankebe et al.•European Journal on Criminal…•2014

  • How risk communication affects public trust in government

    Open Access•Nan Li, Nuoxue Li et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • The 2017 French riots and trust in the police

    Open Access•Christof Nägel, M Lutter•European Journal of Criminology•2023

  • Do political and social accountability arrangements increase citizens’ legitimacy perceptions? A vignette experiment in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Lars Brummel, Lisanne De Blok•Public Management Review•2024

  • Are Algorithmic Decisions Legitimate? The Effect of Process and Outcomes on Perceptions of Legitimacy of AI Decisions

    Open Access•Kirsten Martins, Kirsten Martin et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • A.C.A … All Coppers Are … an analysis of police legitimacy in Spain

    David Vázquez Morales, Eva Aizpurua et al.•Policing & Society•2023

  • Trust, engagement, information and social licence—insights from New Zealand

    Open Access•Peter Edwards, Aysha Fleming et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Factors Affecting Hunters’ Trust and Cooperation

    Brent A Rudolph, Shawn J Riley•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2014

  • Anti-fracking protests and compliance with police

    Open Access•Paul B Stretesky, Damien Short et al.•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2024

  • Standardisation—the end of professional discretion

    Lina Ponnert, Kerstin Svensson•European Journal of Social Work•2015

  • Recasting the Sovereign Wealth Fund Debate

    Ashby Monk•New Political Economy•2009

  • Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults' and youths' willingness to collaborate with police

    Kristina Murphy•Policing & Society•2013

  • We're All in This Together?’ A Survey Experiment on the Perceived Legitimacy of Region‐Specific Crisis Interventions in Germany and the Netherlands

    Open Access•Lars Brummel, Dimiter Toshkov et al.•Governance•2025

  • Viewing Things Differently

    Open Access•Justice Tankebe•Criminology•2013

  • Empowering the Global South? Legitimacy in Regional Internet Registries

    Open Access•Hortense Jongen, Jan Aart Scholte et al.•Global Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Institutional sources of legitimacy in multistakeholder global governance at Icann

    Open Access•Hortense Jongen, Jan Aart Scholte•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • Citizens' perceptions of the legitimacy of independent agencies

    Open Access•Dovilė Rimkutė, Honorata Mazepus•Public Administration Review•2025

  • When Do Citizens Consider Political Parties Legitimate

    Open Access•Ann-Kristin Kölln•British Journal of Political…•2024

  • Governing algorithmic decisions

    Open Access•Anat Waldman, Kirsten Martins•Big Data & Society•2022

  • Assessing the Direct and Indirect Effects of Legitimacy on Public Empowerment of Police

    Open Access•Richard K Moule, George W Burru et al.•Law & Society Review•2019

  • What explains the dynamics of citizens' satisfaction with democracy? An integrated framework for panel data

    Open Access•Ann-Kristin Kölln, Kees Aarts•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Public Perceptions of the Legitimacy of the Law and Legal Authorities

    Open Access•Devon Johnson, E R Maguire et al.•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Maybe we should take the legal ways

    Open Access•Anna Macdonald, J Cooper-Knock et al.•Law & Society Review•2022

  • Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices

    Russell J Dalton•DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES, DEMOCRATIC…•2004

  • A systems analysis of political life

    David Easton•A systems analysis of political…•1979

  • Critical Citizens

    Pippa Norris•Critical citizens•1999

  • How can we trust our fellow citizens

    Open Access•Claus Offe•Democracy and Trust•1999

  • Differenz und Integration

    Open Access•Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie Kongress, Karl-Siegbert Rehberg•Differenz und Integration•1997

  • Why Trust Matters

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington, Marc Hetherington•Why Trust Matters•2018

  • Disaffected Democracies

    Susan J Pharr, Robert D Putnam•Disaffected Democracies•2000

  • Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society

    James William Coleman•American Journal of Sociology•1988

  • Trust

    Piotr Sztompka•Trust•1999

  • Public images of political parties

    Russell J Dalton, Steven Weldon et al.•West European Politics•2005

  • Explaining Public Support for Legislative Term Limits

    Jeffrey A Karp•Public Opinion Quarterly•1995

  • Organizing consent

    Open Access•Marcia Grimes•European Journal of Political…•2006

  • Political Trust and Trustworthiness

    Margaret Levi, Laura Stoker•Annual Review of Political Science•2000

  • Political Parties and Confidence in Government

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller, Ola Listhaug•British Journal of Political…•1990

  • A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support

    Open Access•David Easton•British Journal of Political…•1975

  • Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital

    James S Coleman•American Journal of Sociology•1988

Unique citing works24
Citations per year1,41
Citation span2009 - 2026 (18)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 24

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae