Public goods in Michael Oakeshott’s ‘world of pragmata

Bibliographic Data

ID6260322
AuthorsMaurits De Jongh (0000-0003-0750-2946, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Germany, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume21
Issue3
Pages561-584
Publication date2022-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1474-8851 • E-ISSN: 1741-2730
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1474885119890452
OpenAlexW2993321629
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited35

Michael Oakeshott’s account of political economy is claimed to have found its ‘apotheosis under Thatcherism’. Against critics who align him with a preference for small government, this article points to Oakeshott’s stress on the indispensability of an infrastructure of government-provided public goods, in which individual agency and associative freedom can flourish. I argue that Oakeshott’s account of political economy invites a contestatory politics over three types of public goods, which epitomize the unresolvable tension he diagnosed between nomocratic and teleocratic conceptions of the modern state. These three types are the system of civil law, the by-products of the operation of civil law and public goods which result from policies. The article concludes that Oakeshott offers an important corrective to political theories which favour either market mediation or radical democratic governance of the commons as self-sustaining modes of providing and enjoying goods

Agency (philosophy · Commons · Democracy · Economics · Law and economics · Neoclassical economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public good · Social science · Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access