Mixing Methods

A Nested Analysis of EU Member State Transposition Patterns

Bibliographic Data

ID6261992
AuthorsBrooke Luetgert (University of Mannheim), Tanja Dannwolf (University of Mannheim)
Year2009
Volume10
Issue3
Pages307-334
Publication date2009-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Union Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1465-1165 • E-ISSN: 1741-2757
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1465116509337772
OpenAlexW2122450507
LanguageEN
Citations received25
References cited54

European compliance research has benefited greatly from both quantitative and qualitative studies. Scholars have raised our awareness of potential country, policy sector and Directive-specific compliance patterns, while drawing on very different samples of transposition and infringement data as well as institutional and preference-driven explanations for the observed trends. In our nested analysis of transposition timeliness across nine member states and 1192 directives, we critically assess the fit of our event history model as well as explicit patterns among countryvs. sector-specific trends. We then discuss the relative position of existing case studies within the larger sample based on their deviance and consider the extent to which member state transposition patterns can be generalized or remain individual, Directive-specific phenomena

Compliance (psychology · Deviance (statistics · Directive · Econometrics · Economics · European union · International economics · Member state · Member states · Political science · Position (finance · Positive economics · Sample (material · Statistics · Transposition (logic · Computer Science · Mathematics · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub