Unredressed” Grievances under RTE
Navigating the State Labyrinth
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6264399 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Malini Bhattacharjee (Azim Premji University), Dolashree Mysoor (Azim Premji University) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-45 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0952-1895 • E-ISSN: 1468-0491 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/gove.12132 |
| OpenAlex | W2166861881 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 6 |
Despite the refrain that India's statutory rights suffer from weak enforcement, little academic attention has been paid toward the role of grievance redress mechanisms that are crucial to rights enforcement. This article undertakes a systematic policy analysis of the grievance redress system under the Right to Education (RTE) Act at the level of both design and performance by illustrating it through the Karnataka example. Our findings show that the redress procedures under RTE in Karnataka are perplexing and poorly designed and have not led to enforcement of the right. With faltering administrative accountability, many complainants find themselves with unresolved grievances leading to unenforced or improperly enforced rights. Significant changes in the law and a substantial redesign of institutions are vital for effectively enforcing the RTE
Accountability · Enforcement · Grievance · Law and economics · Political science · Redress · Sociology · State (computer science · Statutory law · Sustenance · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Ombudsman and Human Rights
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |