Predictors of Compromise over Social and Political Issues

Bibliographic Data

ID6266465
AuthorsAnanthi Al Ramiah (0000-0002-9459-0210), Miles Hewstone (0000-0002-8861-0465)
Year2012
Volume47
Issue3
Pages296-320
Publication date2012-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernment and Opposition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0017-257X • E-ISSN: 1477-7053
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01364.x
OpenAlexW2032368604
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited34

This article provides a social psychological analysis of the neglected issue of ‘intergroup compromise’. We discuss the factors that promote respondents' willingness to compromise with two very different outgroups. We present a framework in which altruistic motivations (such as empathy) and egoistic motivations (such as trust and symbolic threat) act as proximal predictors of compromise, with intergroup contact as a distal predictor. We found that respondents who had more positive contact with homosexuals perceived them to be less threatening, and felt more empathy towards them, and in turn, were more likely to compromise with them on group-specific issues (controlling for the general tendency to compromise). We also found that respondents who had more negative contact with Muslims perceived them to be more threatening, and in turn, were less likely to compromise with them. We discuss these results with reference to recent developments in intergroup relations and the state of public discourse in contemporary Britain, examine their implications for intergroup relations in pluralistic contexts, and make suggestions for future research on willingness to compromise with outgroups

Compromise · Empathy · Ingroups and outgroups · Outgroup · Political science · Politics · Cultural Differences and Values · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub