Coding Historical Qualitative Cases and Explaining Outcomes

A Rejoinder

Bibliographic Data

ID6266627
AuthorsScott Mainwaring (0000-0003-2729-8049, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume52
Issue3
Pages549-557
Publication date2017-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernment and Opposition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0017-257X • E-ISSN: 1477-7053
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/gov.2017.9
OpenAlexW2604559208
LanguageEN
References cited7

This rejoinder responds to Kenneth Roberts’s criticisms of my review published in these pages in August 2016. Roberts’s book, Changing Course, is a major contribution to scholarship on Latin American party systems, but Roberts and I disagree about three key issues. Firstly, because Roberts measured the economic effects of different kinds of party systems beginning in 1980, his coding of party systems must be immediately prior to that. Secondly, Roberts and I agree that many Latin American party systems exhibited deep change during the long era of important substitution industrialization (roughly 1940–80). In my judgement, the coding of party systems should reflect these changes more than Changing Course does. Thirdly, following principles for understanding causation, I argue that Changing Course does not conclusively show that labour-mobilizing party systems caused deeper economic crises and greater party system instability than elitist party systems

Causation · Economics · Judgement · Latin Americans · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Positive economics · Scholarship · Sociology · Law · Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America · Political Conflict and Governance · Politics and Society in Latin America

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub