Two-level games and bargaining outcomes

Whygaiatsusucceeds in Japan in some cases but not others

Bibliographic Data

ID6268570
AuthorsLeonard Schoppa (0000-0002-4749-0452, University of Virginia, corresponding author), Leonard J Schoppa
Year1993
Volume47
Issue3
Pages353-386
Publication date1993-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Organization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8183 • E-ISSN: 1531-5088
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0020818300027995
OpenAlexW2101099615
LanguageEN
Citations received59
References cited36

One of the strengths of Robert Putnam's two-level bargaining game model is its ability to capture how international negotiations make it possible for negotiators to pursue synergistic strategies aimed at improving their prospects for a favorable deal by reshaping politics in both their own and their counterparts' domestic arenas. While reaffirming the utility of this approach, this article argues that Putnam describes only some of the synergistic strategies available to negotiators. In addition to “reverberation” and “synergistic linkage,” a negotiator can also reshape politics in his or her counterpart's domestic arena in two other ways: (1) by transforming decision making in ways that expand elite participation and bring the weight of public opinion to bear on policies that were previously dictated by small groups of privileged domestic actors and (2) by influencing the way in which policy alternatives are considered in the decisionmaking process. Through an examination of the Structural Impediments Initiative, a set of negotiations through which the United States applied a great deal of foreign pressure (gaiaisu) on Japan, the article makes the case for the above modifications to the Putnam model and argues that “participation expansion” strategies are most likely to be successful when involvement in decision making (before foreign intervention) is limited and latent support for foreign demands exists outside the privileged elite, while “alternative specification” is most likely to work when opportunities exist to link favored policy proposals to already recognized domestic problems

Economics · Elite · Foreign policy · International relations · Intervention (counseling · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Process (computing · Public relations · Set (abstract data type · Work (physics · Computer Science · European Union Policy and Governance · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub