Further Back to the Future
Neo-Royalism, the Trump Administration, and the Emerging International System
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6270128 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stacie E Goddard (0000-0003-1891-636X, Wellesley College, corresponding author), Abraham L Newman (0000-0003-4105-1229, Georgetown University), Abraham Newman (Georgetown University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | S1 |
| Pages | S12-S25 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8183 • E-ISSN: 1531-5088 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020818325101057 |
| OpenAlex | W7106111291 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
With the Liberal International Order (LIO) in decline, scholars have focused increasingly on the possible return to a Westphalian great power system marked by sovereigntist claims and balancing among states. The actions of the Trump administration, however, raise a number of significant puzzles for such accounts—the US seems willing to sign deals with traditional adversaries including Russia and China, while targeting long-standing allies like Canada and Denmark. At the same time, transactional politics often serve narrow personalist interests rather than national objectives. In short, a Westphalian lens focused on states and sovereignty may generate intellectual blinders that misreads the emerging international order. To overcome these limitations, we propose an alternative account, which we label neo-royalism. The neo-royalist order centers on an international system structured by a small group of hyper elites, which we term cliques. Such cliques seek to legitimize their authority through appeals to their exceptionalism in order to generate durable material and status hierarchies based on the extraction of financial and cultural tributes. This short paper lays out the key elements of the neo-royalist order, differentiating it from the Westphalian and Liberal International Orders, and applies its insights to better grapple with the emerging system being promoted by the United States under Donald J. Trump. For policymakers and scholars, the neo-royalist approach clarifies recent events in US foreign policy. Theoretically, the field should take contending ideas of international order seriously, and establish a research agenda beyond a backward looking view to the Westphalian moment
Exceptionalism · Field (mathematics) · Foreign policy · International relations · Order (exchange) · Politics · Sovereignty · Westphalian sovereignty · Canadian Policy and Governance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · State Capitalism and Financial Governance
Neo-royal urbanisms
Strongmen and warmaking
Time and the Neo-Monarchist Turn
Big Tech as World Makers
Reversing Democratic Backsliding by Learning From “Bright Spots” of Public Service
The ambit of transitional justice
Reactionary internationalism as a challenge to the liberal international order
Oil blockades and the geopolitics of double standards
Contested transitions and perspectives on peace—Deutungskämpfe im Übergang
Decoding the New Cold War
The emergence and politics of polyalignment
A market for war? the reinforcing logics of Europe’s security turn 1
Selective Activism
After the Landslide
Can Europe Sustain a New Rules‐Based Geopolitical Order
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 15 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |