Non-decision decisions in the Huawei 5G dilemma
Policy in Japan, the UK, and Germany
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6278302 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alanna Krolikowski (0000-0002-2872-5471, Missouri University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Todd H Hall (0000-0003-0499-4367, University of Oxford) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 171-189 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Japanese Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-1099 • E-ISSN: 1474-0060 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s146810992200038x |
| OpenAlex | W4319759181 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 15 |
Huawei, the telecommunications company based in the People's Republic of China (PRC), has presented the governments of several middle powers with a policy dilemma. On the one hand, Huawei's affordable 5G network technology is attractive to telecommunications operators in these countries, which do not have domestic producers of this equipment. On the other hand, the U.S. government and intelligence agencies in other countries maintain that Huawei gear presents intolerable network security risks, a charge that the PRC government and Huawei forcefully reject as they insist Huawei merits access to foreign markets. Facing the question of whether and how to allow the installation of Huawei's 5G equipment in their domestic networks, the governments of Japan, the United Kingdom, and Germany have been caught between the competing demands of the two rivalrous superpowers and faced internal divisions among communities of government experts. At first glance, Japan, the UK, and Germany each appear to have responded to the Huawei dilemma in a different way. The Japanese government moved quickly and without formal announcement to exclude Huawei from its market, while publicly denying a ban. The UK government initially allowed Huawei to supply some of its national 5G infrastructure, but then reversed itself to ban the company's equipment outright after a U.S. regulatory change. The German government has yet to officially ban Huawei, but has taken successive steps to curtail the PRC company's continued involvement in its domestic networks. In spite of their apparent differences, the three national responses to the Huawei dilemma share a fundamental commonality: all amount to ‘non-decision decisions’ on the question of whether and how to allow Huawei to supply domestic 5G networks. In one way or another, each government avoided making policy decisions that were either explicit, definitive, or singular on the issue, but nonetheless reduced the likelihood of Huawei's participation in its domestic 5G infrastructure. After developing the concept of a ‘non-decision decision,’ we explain why these maneuvers are not isolated responses to a specific policy conundrum, but may presage a mode of middle power coping with competing demands from two increasingly rivalrous superpowers
Business · China · Dilemma · German · German government · Government (linguistics · International trade · Political science · Telecommunications · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Engineering · Law · Legal and Policy Issues
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Trade Versus Security
Chinese Multinational Enterprises Operating in Western Economies
The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability
Acting one way and talking another
Bipolarity is Back
The Meaning of the Cyber Revolution
Weaponized Interdependence
The Huawei Affair and China's Technology Ambitions
Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School
The political economy of nontariff barriers
From CNOOC to Huawei
Between the Eagle and the Dragon
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |