Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Arms Races and War Initiation

Some Alternatives to the Intriligator-Brito Model

Bibliographic Data

ID6283518
AuthorsTheresa Mayer (0000-0002-9228-819X, corresponding author), Thomas F Mayer (Department of Sociology, University of Colorado)
Year1986
Volume30
Issue1
Pages3-28
Publication date1986-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022002786030001001
OpenAlexW2152140919
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited2

Intriligator and Brito argue that certain arms races can lead to peace and certain disarming races can lead to war. They support this position with a formal model of the relationship between weapons levels and war initiation. This article evaluates and criticizes the Intriligator-Brito model. The results of their model are shown to depend upon questionable assumptions both about the conditions under which nuclear attack might be initiated or deterred and about the nature of nuclear war itself. Two sets of alternatives to the Intriligator-Brito (I-B) model are developed. In contrast to the Intriligator-Brito analysis, most of the topologies generated by the alternative models suggest that arms races are unlikely to yield stable peace. The issue of disarmament is more complicated. If security is identified with the ability to inflict painful retribution on the enemy, then situations of near complete disarmament are necessarily hazardous. However, the main implication of the alternative models is that mutual disarmament—at least mutual disarmament to moderate weapons levels—will not increase the chance of war and may well diminish it. At least one of the alternative models points out that no situation of mutual deterrence may be possible. Arms races may not always lead to war nor disarmament to peace, but considerable circumspection is needed when drawing policy inferences from war initiation models of the Intriligator-Brito genre because the results are highly sensitive to the underlying assumptions

Deterrence theory · Disarmament · Economics · Law and economics · Nuclear weapon · Political science · Position (finance · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense

  • Psychological Aspects of the Nuclear Arms Threat

    Open Access•Christopher C French•Psychological Reports•1989

  • Psychological Aspects of the Nuclear Arms Threat

    Open Access•Christopher C French•Psychological Reports•1989

  • An Introduction To Lewis Fry Richardson and His Mathematical Theory of War and Peace

    Open Access•GLENN HESS, G D Hess•Conflict Management and Peace…•1995

  • Consequential Damage and Nuclear Deterrence

    Open Access•Charles H Anderton, Thomas Fogarty•Conflict Management and Peace…•1990

  • Classical deterrence theory

    Frank C Zagare•International Interactions•1996

  • Toward the Global Optimization Model of Peace Defense

    Open Access•Mark Reitman•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1987

  • Can Arms Races Lead to the Outbreak of War

    Open Access•Michael D Intriligator, Dagobert L Brito•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1984

  • Deterrence before Hiroshima

    Eugene M Emme, George H Quester•Technology and Culture•1967

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,15
Citation span1987 - 1996 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae