A comparison of interpreted and abstract versions of mixed-motive games

Bibliographic Data

ID6283753
AuthorsCarol J Orwant (University of Iowa), Jack E Orwant (University of Iowa)
Year1970
Volume14
Issue1
Pages91-97
Publication date1970-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/002200277001400110
OpenAlexW2038142103
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited9

SITUATIONS CORRESPONDING TO TEN INTERPRETED VERSION DILEMMAS 1. (2, 2) (-5, 5) (5,)-5) (-I,)-1) 2. (3, 3) (-5, 5) (5, -5) (-4, -4) 3. (3, 3) (-4, 4) (4, -4) (-3, -3) 4. (3, 3) (-4, 4) (4,-4) (-2,-2) 5. (4, 4) (5, 5) (5,-5) (-3,-3) 6. (1, 1) (-4, 4) (4, -4) (-3, -3) 7. (4, 4) (-5, 5) (5,-5) (-4,-4) 8. (2, 2) (-3, 3) (3,-3) (-1,-1) 9. (1, 1) (-5, 5) (5,-5) (-1,-1) 10. (2, 2) (-3, 3) (3, -3) (-2,)2) out regard to his attribution of a cooperative or competitive choice to the other (hypothetical) player. The abstract situations are presented in Table 2

Attribution · Combinatorics · Mathematical economics · Business Strategy and Innovation · Game Theory and Applications · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub