Roots of the Modern Interstate Border Dispute

Bibliographic Data

ID6284259
AuthorsRobert Mandel (International Affairs Department Lewis and Clark College, corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume24
Issue3
Pages427-454
Publication date1980-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/002200278002400303
OpenAlexW2024754820
LanguageEN
Citations received34
References cited23

Recently there has been a flare-up of several significant international border disputes. This study examines when these disputes are most likely to arise, when they will escalate into war, and when they will spread beyond the original national participants. Specifically, this article hypothesizes that the frequency of border disputes is highest between nations that have (1) roughly equal levels of power and (2) relatively low levels of technology; that the severity of these disputes is highest when there is (3) a low level of technology, (4) contention on ethnic rather than resource issues, and (5) a two-state rather than three-state “mutually-contiguous” set; and that the scope of these disputes is highest between nations that are (6) members of opposing blocs rather than the same bloc. Data on 66 border dispute cases during 1945–1974 confirm these hypotheses

Development economics · Economics · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Scope (computer science · Sociology · State (computer science · Territorial dispute · European and International Law Studies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Conflict and Governance

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub