Militarized territorial disputes
States’ attempts to transfer reputation for resolve
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3917199 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Krista E Wiegand (0000-0001-8820-112X, Georgia Southern University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 101-113 |
| Publication date | 2011-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343310389414 |
| OpenAlex | W2130650558 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 52 |
States involved in territorial disputes are more likely initiate militarized interstate disputes to threaten or use force (MIDs) compared to states involved in other types of interstate disputes, when the disputed territory has strategic or ethnic value, and when the opposing states are contiguous, rivals, or have relative power parity. Though useful, these factors are static or rarely change over time, so they cannot explain the timing of an MID in a territorial dispute. It is not clear why a challenger state would threaten or use force at one point in the dispute, but not at another point. This study proposes that challenger states sometimes use MIDs not only to signal resolve to the opposing state in the territorial dispute, but to credibly demonstrate resolve to other adversaries in other disputes - an attempt to transfer reputation for resolve. To tackle the debate about transferability of reputation for resolve, the study empirically analyzes all territorial disputes from 1919 to 1995 and finds support that challenger states are more likely to initiate territorial MIDs as costly signals of resolve and credibility around the same time as another MID with a different adversary. Further analysis indicates that in terms of intensity level, challenger states are more likely to use threats, displays of force, or low intensity uses of force when initiating an MID to signal resolve to other states
Adversary · Computer security · Credibility · Deterrence theory · Economics · Incentive · Law and economics · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Reputation · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · Territorial dispute · Territorial integrity · Transferability · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security
A Migratory Mess or a Demographic Peace? Voluntary and Involuntary Population Flows and Conflict Intensity in Sub-Saharan Africa
Reexamining Reputation for Resolve
Move First to Avoid the Worst
Precrisis military hostility and escalation in international crises
Fear of rejection
The Chicken or the Egg
Signaling Resolve
Reluctant acceptance of legal solutions to territorial disputes as signals of foreign policy reorientation
Intuitive deterrence theorists…with feelings? Perceptions of Chinese resolve in a crisis
Honor and War
Democratic Reputations in Crises and War
Modeling Two Types of Peace
The Consequences of Defeat
Territory and war
In the Shadow of Power
Parity and War
War and Punishment
The War Puzzle
Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War
Standing Your Ground
The Steps to War
Strategic Rivalries in World Politics
The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century
War and Peace in International Rivalry
The Correlates of War (Cow) Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.0
The MID 3 data set, 1993–2001
Territoriality and War in International Crises
The Rational Deterrence Theory Debate
The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001
Charting A Course To Conflict
Geographical Proximity and Issue Salience
Opportunity” and “willingness’ as ordering concepts in the study of war
Democratization and the Danger of War
Border and territorial disputes
The Tibetan Rebellion of 1959 and China's Changing Relations with India and the Soviet Union
Deterrence Theory Revisited
What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980
Territorial Disputes and Interstate War, 1945-1987
Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976
War Expansion and War Outcome
Attracting Trouble
Bones of Contention
Roots of the Modern Interstate Border Dispute
System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict among the Great Powers
Bordering on Peace
A Unified Explanation of Territorial Conflict
Unwelcome Neighbors
Contested Territory, Strategic Rivalries, and Conflict Escalation
Distinguishing Rivals That Go to War from Those That Do Not
The Substance and Study of Borders in International Relations Research
Democracy and Conflict Management
Contentious Issues and World Politics
Rationalist explanations for war
The Might of the Pen
Bargaining and War
Territory, Contiguity, and International Conflict
Reputations and deterrence
What Makes Deterrence Work
Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816-1992
Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises
International Crises and Domestic Politics
The Escalation of Great Power Militarized Disputes
Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes
The Sino-Indian Border Dispute and Sino-Indian Relations
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,08 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |