Cooperative Game Solutions
Australian, Indian, and U.S. Opinions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6285086 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Shubik (0000-0003-1956-6808, Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 63-76 |
| Publication date | 1986-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022002786030001005 |
| OpenAlex | W2151558830 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
As part of several lectures the audiences in Australia, India, and the United States were asked how the gain from a cooperative agreement should be divided among three individuals. The responses are considered in the context of various cooperative solutions that have been suggested in the theory of games. More questions are raised than answered
Context (archaeology · Economics · Epistemology · Game theory · Geography · Mathematical economics · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Sociology · Auction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1989 - 1992 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |