Concluding reflections
The enduring relevance of Scharpf’s asymmetry argument
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6290010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Höpner (0000-0002-7996-1618, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies), Susanne K Schmidt (0000-0001-7931-9935, University of Bremen), Daniel Seikel (Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI) of the Hans-Böckler-Foundation) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 2655-2661 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of European Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-1763 • E-ISSN: 1466-4429 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13501763.2025.2512902 |
| OpenAlex | W4411065314 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
Argument (complex analysis · Asymmetry · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · Relevance (law · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |