Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How are the powers of the president decided? Vote trading in the making of Taiwan’s semi-presidential constitution

Bibliographic Data

ID6299404
AuthorsJih-Wen Lin (Academia Sinica, Taiwan, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume38
Issue5
Pages659-672
Publication date2017-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0192512116631340
OpenAlexW2410901723
LanguageEN
References cited29

To establish an unambiguous source of accountability, a semi-presidential constitution can either allow the president to dominate government formation and dissolve the parliament without a prior vote of no confidence being passed or it can reverse the arrangement of these powers. Accordingly, Taiwan is an unusual case of semi-presidentialism because the president can unilaterally appoint the premier but cannot actively dissolve the parliament, so the electorate is seldom called upon to evaluate the responsibility of the constitutional agents in a snap election. Vote-trading theory offers a reasonable explanation for this puzzling situation by showing how seemingly unconnected issues can be voted on as a package. In Taiwan, the choice of presidential powers was complicated by the sovereignty issue, leading the reformers of the constitution to deny the legislature the power to confirm the president’s appointment of the premier in exchange for downsizing the Taiwan Provincial Government. This is exactly what vote-trading theory foresees: votes on different issues may be traded if no “pivot” finds the status quo to be his/her favorite option. By demonstrating how the linking of unconnected issues can obstruct institutional design, vote-trading theory expands our understanding of constitutional choice

Constitution · Contingent vote · Economics · Enumerated powers · Government (linguistics · Group voting ticket · Impeachment · Law and economics · Legislature · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Presidential system · Separation of powers · Status quo · Veto · Voting · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law

  • Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe

    Robert Elgie, Sophia Moestrup•Semi-presidentialism Outside Europe•2007

  • Presidents and Assemblies

    Open Access•Matthew Soberg Shugart, John Michael Carey•Presidents and Assemblies•1992

  • Comparative Constitutional Engineering

    Open Access•Giovanni Sartori•Comparative Constitutional…•1997

  • Self-Interest, Ideology, and Logrolling in Congressional Voting

    James B Kau, Paul H Rubin•The Journal of Law and Economics•1979

  • Veto Players

    George Tsebelis•Veto Players•2002

  • The Calculus of Consent

    James M Buchanan, James Buchanan et al.•The calculus of consent•1960

  • Perspectives on Public Choice

    Open Access•Dennis C Mueller•Perspectives on Public Choice•1996

  • The Theory of Institutional Design

    Open Access•Philip Pettit, Bruce Talbot Coram et al.•Theory of Institutional Design•1996

  • Patterns of democracy

    Laura Morales Diez De Ulzurrun•Choice Reviews Online•2000

  • Institutional Design, Uncertainty, and Path Dependency during Transitions

    Open Access•Michael Mcfaul•Constitutional Political Economy•1999

  • Opportunity Lost

    Gregory W Noble•The China Journal•1999

  • Vers un système semi-présidentiel à la française ? [La réforme constitutionnelle ]

    Jean-Pierre Cabestan•Perspectives chinoises•1997

  • Comparative Constitutional Engineering

    Open Access•Peter C Ordeshook•Political Science Quarterly•1995

  • Problems of Majority Voting

    Gordon Tullock•Journal of Political Economy•1959

  • Promoting Effective Democracy, Chinese Style

    Linda Chao, Ramon H Myers et al.•Asian Survey•1997

  • The Path to European Integration

    Open Access•Paul Pierson•Comparative Political Studies•1996

  • Historical Institutionalism and the Varieties of Federalism in Germany and Canada

    Jörg Broschek•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2012

  • Estimating the Effect of Nonseparable Preferences in Eu Treaty Negotiations

    Open Access•Daniel Finke•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2009

  • Constitutional choices

    Open Access•Jai Kwan Jung, Christopher J Deering•International Political Science…•2015

  • Elections in Double-Member Districts with Nonseparable Voter Preferences

    Open Access•Dean Lacy, Emerson M S Niou•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1998

  • Elite Settlements in Taiwan

    Open Access•Tung-I Huang, Thomas S Huang et al.•Journal of democracy•1998

  • Comparative presidencies

    Open Access•Alan Siaroff•European Journal of Political…•2003

  • Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier-Presidential Regimes

    Steven D Roper•Comparative Politics•2002

  • Federalism and Political Change

    Open Access•Jörg Broschek•Canadian Journal of Political…•2010

  • Asymmetric bilateral bargaining in the new Russian Federation

    Open Access•Mikhail Filippov, Михаил Филиппов et al.•Communist and Post-Communist…•1999

  • The Paradox of Vote Trading

    Open Access•William H Riker, Steven J Bram et al.•American Political Science Review•1973

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae