Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Redefining “expansion” in congressional communication

Homestyles for a digital constituency

Bibliographic Data

ID6300985
AuthorsStephanie Davis (0000-0002-0950-7663, School of Public Affairs University of Arkansas‐Little Rock Little Rock Arkansas USA), Annelise Russell (0000-0002-8417-1709, Martin School for Public Policy and Adminisitration University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume50
Issue3
Publication date2025-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lsq.12483
OpenAlexW4403767132
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited42

Self‐presentation in Congress is more nationalized, with digital constituencies on platforms such as Twitter offering new reputation‐building opportunities. Digital constituencies transform traditional expectations of constituent communication, challenging Richard Fenno's theory that representatives adopt an “expansionist” style with constituents during early, vulnerable phases of their tenure. In a digital era that encourages a more national approach, we question how Fenno's distinction between expansionist and protectionist phases of connecting with constituents applies to reputation‐building with digital constituencies. While electorally vulnerable senators still seek to expand their presentation among geographic constituents, digital platforms, such as Twitter, incentivize them to protect their reputation among a digital constituency. We analyzed senators' Twitter communications from 2013 to 2023. We find the electoral vulnerabilities of Fenno's expansionist local model are associated with a protectionist model of engagement with digital constituencies on Twitter. Our study sheds light on the significance of online reputation management and its implications for representing a media‐influenced, modern Congress

Business · Expansionism · International trade · Political science · Politics · Presentation (obstetrics · Protectionism · Public relations · Reputation · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • The Multipath Money Trail

    Open Access•Charles R Hunt, Jaclyn J Kettler•The Forum•2026

  • How National Cues Polarize Perceptions of Political Figures

    Open Access•James Sievert, Joel Sievert et al.•Political Communication•2026

  • Bureaucratic Responsiveness in Times of Crisis

    Open Access•A Gunderson, Maggie Macdonald•Urban Affairs Review•2026

  • Boosted and Branded

    Open Access•Stephanie Davis, Annelise Russell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • The Personal Vote

    Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain et al.•Personal Vote•1987

  • The Increasingly United States

    D J Hopkins•Increasingly United States•2018

  • Legislating in the Dark

    James M Curry•Legislating in the Dark•2015

  • Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman•Legislative Effectiveness in the…•2014

  • Representational Style in Congress

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer•Representational Style in Congress•2013

  • The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Election Law Journal: Rules,…•2002

  • Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics

    Gunn Enli, Gunn Sara Enli et al.•Information Communication & Society•2013

  • The social media logic of political interaction

    Open Access•Bente Kalsnes, Anders Olof Larsson et al.•First Monday•2017

  • Disentangling the Personal and Partisan Incumbency Advantages

    Anthony Fowler, Arnold Bennett Hall•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2014

  • Bill sponsorship and legislative success among freshmen senators, 1954–1986

    Open Access•Scott H Ainsworth, Scott Ainsworth et al.•The Social Science Journal•1996

  • Nationalization in U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Elections

    Open Access•James Sievert, Joel Sievert et al.•American Politics Research•2019

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven Webster et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Martin J Kifer et al.•American Political Science Review•2009

  • Electoral Security and the Provision of Constituency Service

    Kyle Dropp, Zachary Peskowitz•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The Emergence of the Personal Vote

    Richard Herrera, Michael Yawn•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • How Modern Lawmakers Advertise Their Legislative Effectiveness to Constituents

    Charles R Hunt, Kristina C Miler•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Economic Partisan Advantages in Congressional Contests

    Glenn R Parker•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986

  • Sister Space

    Open Access•N E Brown, Christopher J Clark et al.•Politics & Gender•2023

  • Conditional Congressional communication

    Open Access•R M Blum, Lindsey Cormack et al.•Political Science Research and…•2023

  • Connecting to Constituents

    Open Access•Kevin M Esterling, David Lazer et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections

    Peverill Squire, Christina Fastnow•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Words Speak Louder than Actions

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Andrew Stones et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer•Political Analysis•2010

  • Dynamics of Polarizing Rhetoric in Congressional Tweets

    Open Access•Andrew O Ballard, Ryan Detamble et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Revealing Issue Salience via Costly Protest

    Open Access•Lagina Gause•British Journal of Political…•2022

  • Beyond Partisanship

    Charles R Hunt•Congress & the Presidency•2021

  • Campaign Rhetoric and the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Martin Kifer et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • Different Chambers, Divergent Rhetoric

    Open Access•Abigail Smith, Sarah A Smith et al.•American Politics Research•2022

  • Twitter Style

    Open Access•Heather K Evans, Victoria Cordova et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • A Bayesian explanation for the effect of incumbency

    Open Access•Anthony Fowler•Electoral Studies•2018

  • How the Economy and Partisanship Shaped the 2012 Presidential and Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•Political Science Quarterly•2013

  • Senators at Home

    Open Access•Jaclyn Kaslovsky•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Gender and vote revelation strategy in the United States Congress

    Lindsey Cormack•Journal of Gender Studies•2016

  • The Case of the Vanishing Marginals

    Open Access•Morris P Fiorina•American Political Science Review•1977

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae