Redefining “expansion” in congressional communication
Homestyles for a digital constituency
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6300985 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephanie Davis (0000-0002-0950-7663, School of Public Affairs University of Arkansas‐Little Rock Little Rock Arkansas USA), Annelise Russell (0000-0002-8417-1709, Martin School for Public Policy and Adminisitration University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Legislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/lsq.12483 |
| OpenAlex | W4403767132 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 42 |
Self‐presentation in Congress is more nationalized, with digital constituencies on platforms such as Twitter offering new reputation‐building opportunities. Digital constituencies transform traditional expectations of constituent communication, challenging Richard Fenno's theory that representatives adopt an “expansionist” style with constituents during early, vulnerable phases of their tenure. In a digital era that encourages a more national approach, we question how Fenno's distinction between expansionist and protectionist phases of connecting with constituents applies to reputation‐building with digital constituencies. While electorally vulnerable senators still seek to expand their presentation among geographic constituents, digital platforms, such as Twitter, incentivize them to protect their reputation among a digital constituency. We analyzed senators' Twitter communications from 2013 to 2023. We find the electoral vulnerabilities of Fenno's expansionist local model are associated with a protectionist model of engagement with digital constituencies on Twitter. Our study sheds light on the significance of online reputation management and its implications for representing a media‐influenced, modern Congress
Business · Expansionism · International trade · Political science · Politics · Presentation (obstetrics · Protectionism · Public relations · Reputation · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics
The Personal Vote
The Increasingly United States
Legislating in the Dark
Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress
Representational Style in Congress
The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections
Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics
The social media logic of political interaction
Disentangling the Personal and Partisan Incumbency Advantages
Bill sponsorship and legislative success among freshmen senators, 1954–1986
Nationalization in U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Elections
The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century
Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections
Electoral Security and the Provision of Constituency Service
The Emergence of the Personal Vote
How Modern Lawmakers Advertise Their Legislative Effectiveness to Constituents
Economic Partisan Advantages in Congressional Contests
Sister Space
Conditional Congressional communication
Connecting to Constituents
Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections
Words Speak Louder than Actions
A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts
Dynamics of Polarizing Rhetoric in Congressional Tweets
Revealing Issue Salience via Costly Protest
Beyond Partisanship
Campaign Rhetoric and the Incumbency Advantage
Different Chambers, Divergent Rhetoric
Twitter Style
A Bayesian explanation for the effect of incumbency
How the Economy and Partisanship Shaped the 2012 Presidential and Congressional Elections
Senators at Home
Gender and vote revelation strategy in the United States Congress
The Case of the Vanishing Marginals
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |