Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Essay on Sequence, Position, Goals, and Committee Power

Bibliographic Data

ID6301178
AuthorsStephanie S Smith (0000-0001-9943-6717, corresponding author), Steven S Smith
Year1988
Volume13
Issue2
Pages151
Publication date1988-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/439819
OpenAlexW2321054428
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited4

This essay considers the limits of the ex post veto as an explanation for committee power in Congress. A simple bicameral model is developed to indicate the severity of the conditions that must be met for a perfect ex post veto. Common conditions that undermine the ex post veto are explored, such as extreme committees, party turnover, and periodic legislation. Finally, the alternative explanation of member goals is described and Fenno's findings are reexamined. I conclude that the search for the foundations of committee power does not end with the ex post veto, although it remains an important source of leverage for committees

Biology · Business · Physics · Political science · Position (finance · Power (physics · Sequence (biology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration · Finance

  • Unorthodox Lawmaking and the Value of Committee Assignments

    James M Curry, Leah Rosenstiel•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Policymaking in Parochial Legislatures

    Open Access•Claudia N Avellaneda, Felipe Botero et al.•The Latin Americanist•2012

  • Conference Committee Structure and Majority Party Bias in U.S. States

    Open Access•Colin Emrich•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2022

  • The Disappearing Conference Committee

    James M Ryan•Congress & the Presidency•2011

  • Strategic responses to institutional change

    Open Access•Kathleen Bawn•Public Choice•1996

  • Legislative committees as loyalty-generating institutions

    Open Access•David C Coker, W Mark Crain•Public Choice•1994

  • Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work

    Open Access•Víctor Lapuente Giné•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2003

  • Spatial Models of Legislative Choice

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1988

  • The Influence of Conference Committees on Policy Outcomes

    Open Access•Ryan J Vander Wielen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • The Power of Subcommittees

    Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Conflict among Regulators and the Hypothesis of Congressional Dominance

    John T Woolley•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • The Speaker's Discretion

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus, Nathan W Monroe•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Knowledge, Expertise, and Committee Power in the Contemporary Congress

    Open Access•James M Curry•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs

    Fiona Mcgillivray•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Bicameral Negotiations

    Open Access•George Tsebelis, John Money et al.•British Journal of Political…•1995

  • The Continuing Puzzle of Committee Outliers

    Geoffrey D Peterson, Geoffrey Peterson et al.•Congress & the Presidency•1998

  • A Test of Ideological Bias in House Subcommittees, 1979-2000

    J Mark Wrighton, Geoffrey D Peterson et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2003

  • The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•American Political Science Review•1999

  • The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Gatekeeping and Monopoly Power of Committees

    Arthur T Denzau, Robert J Mackay•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo

    Open Access•Thomas Romer, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Public Choice•1978

  • Why are Congressional Committees Powerful

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel, Kenneth A Shepsle et al.•American Political Science Review•1987

Unique citing works19
Citations per year0,5
Citation span1988 - 2025 (38)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae