Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reexamining the Politics of Talk

Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House

Bibliographic Data

ID6301191
AuthorsJonathan S Morris (0000-0002-4886-986X, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume26
Issue1
Pages101
Publication date2001-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/440405
OpenAlexW2072168886
LanguageEN
Citations received50
References cited9

Drawing off the work of Maltzman and Sigelman (1996), this paper looks at the propensity of members to speak on the House floor during minute speeches in the 104th Congress. I used a negative binomial event count model to predict not only who will participate in one in general, but also who will engage in partisan rhetoric, which was such an important aspect of the volatile 104th Congress. The model finds that, while general participation can be predicted, we can also use a number of explanatory variables, such as tenure, electoral insecurity, ideological intensity, party rank, constituency time zone, and party identification to understand why some members engage in partisan rhetoric during minutes and why others do not. The findings have implications both for understanding partisan behavior in the 104th Congress and for understanding and predicting minute speaking practices in the future

Linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Philosophy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • What Drives U.S. Congressional Members’ Policy Attention on Twitter

    Open Access•Libby Hemphill, Annelise Russell et al.•Policy & Internet•2021

  • Divisions at Home, Broken Promises Abroad? How Domestic Politics Shapes the United States’ Nuclear Credibility

    Open Access•Helen Webley-Brown, Lauren Sukin•International Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Position-taking in House debate and the issue of immigration

    Nicole Kalaf-Hughes•Politics Groups and Identities•2013

  • Discourse and dissonance

    Open Access•Bethany Blackstone, Elizabeth A Oldmixon•Research & Politics•2015

  • Weapon of the Weak

    Open Access•Akirav Osnat•Review of European Studies•2017

  • The “Politics of Talk” Have Changed

    Open Access•Donna R Hoffman, Christopher W Larimer et al.•American Politics Research•2025

  • Party Polarization and the Ascendance of Bipartisan Posturing as a Dominant Strategy in Presidential Rhetoric

    Open Access•Jesse H Rhodes•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Getting the message across

    Open Access•Joshua Lerner, Joshua Y Lerner•Public Choice•2018

  • Legislators Off Their Leash

    Open Access•Michael K Romano, Michael Romano•Social Science Quarterly•2018

  • Framing Child Nutrition Programs

    Open Access•Clare R Brock, Clare Brock•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Nonlegislative Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Michael S Rocca•American Politics Research•2007

  • Party Messaging in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Tyler Hughes, Gregory Koger•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Characters of Contention

    Open Access•Maron W Sorenson, Rachael Houston et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Local orientation in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Pamela Ban, Jaclyn Kaslovsky•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Invisible Forces

    Regina Lea Wagner•Women & Politics•2019

  • Speaking as Women

    Tracy Osborn, Jeanette Morehouse Mendez•Women & Politics•2010

  • Catch-22

    Osnat Akirav•Representation•2014

  • Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives

    Open Access•Kathryn Pearson, Logan Dancey•Politics & Gender•2011

  • Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress

    Open Access•Kathryn Pearson, Logan Dancey•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Cross-Platform Partisan Positioning in Congressional Speech

    Open Access•Jon Green, K Shoub et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • The Position-taking Value of Bill Sponsorship in Congress

    Open Access•Michael S Rocca, Stacy B Gordon•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Driving a Wedge? Republicans, Immigration, and the Impact of Substantive Appeals on African American Vote Choice

    Open Access•Tatishe Nteta, Deborah Rice et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Partisan Intensity in Congress

    Open Access•Jeremy Gelman•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Minority Opposition and Asymmetric Parties? Senators’ Partisan Rhetoric on Twitter

    Open Access•Annelise Russell•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Who polarizes parliament? Partisan hostility in Norwegian legislative debates

    Open Access•Maiken Røed, Hanna Bäck et al.•Party Politics•2025

  • What do representatives produce? Work profiles of representatives

    Open Access•Osnat Akirav•Party Politics•2016

  • Politics of Constituency Representation and Legislative Ambition under the Glare of Camera Lights

    Open Access•Tevfik Murat Yildirim•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Rules and Speeches

    Open Access•Daniela Giannetti, Andrea Pedrazzani•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • When Free Traders Become Protectionists

    Open Access•Kristina Miler, Kristina C Miler et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2018

  • The Effects of Election Proximity on Participatory Shirking

    Open Access•Kentaro Fukumoto, Akitaka Matsuo•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Orchestrating Party Talk

    Open Access•Douglas B Harris•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Measuring Congressional Partisanship and Its Consequences

    Open Access•Jeremy Gelman, Shanika L Wilson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Private Members' Bills in the UK Parliament

    Shaun Bowler•Journal of Legislative Studies•2010

  • The talk–listen–respond (TLR) model of representatives on Twitter

    Osnat Akirav•Journal of Legislative Studies•2017

  • Wasting or saving time? How government and opposition parties use time during legislative debates. Evidence from the Italian case

    Andrea Pedrazzani•Journal of Legislative Studies•2017

  • Understanding the political goals of non-binding resolutions

    Aldo F Ponce, Rodrigo Velázquez López Velarde•Journal of Legislative Studies•2019

  • Re-election

    Open Access•Osnat Akirav•Government and Opposition•2015

  • Unpacking the politics of legislative debates

    Open Access•Jorge M Fernandes, Marc Debus et al.•European Journal of Political…•2021

  • Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech

    Open Access•Sven-Oliver Proksch, Sven‐oliver Proksch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • The Politics of Procedural Choice

    Open Access•Niels D Goet•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Public Opinion and Emphatic Legislative Speech

    Open Access•Oliver Rittmann, Tobias Ringwald et al.•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Catholic Politicians and the Politics of Abortion Position Taking

    Open Access•Kathleen Marchetti, David O''Connell et al.•Politics and Religion•2018

  • Pandemic Messaging

    Tanya Gardner, Annelise Russell•Congress & the Presidency•2023

  • And Presidential Support in the 107th Congress

    Michael S Rocca•Congress & the Presidency•2009

  • Representation by the Minute

    Nicole Kalaf-Hughes•Congress & the Presidency•2020

  • The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Bill Sponsorship and Cosponsorship in Congress

    Open Access•Michael S Rocca, G R Sanchez•American Politics Research•2008

  • Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition

    Open Access•Segun T Aroyehun, Almog Simchon et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2025

  • Time to Wake Up

    Deborah Lynn Guber, J Bohr et al.•Environmental Politics•2021

  • Electoral Accountability and Particularistic Legislation

    Open Access•Lucia Motolinia•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Pitch Perfect

    Open Access•Bryce J Dietrich, Mark Hayes et al.•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment

    Morris P Fiorina•Congress, keystone of the…•1977

  • The Personal Vote

    Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain et al.•Personal Vote•1987

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Party Loyalty Among Congressmen

    David R Mayhew•Party Loyalty among Congressmen•1966

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models

    Kenneth A Shepsle•American Journal of Political…•1979

Unique citing works50
Citations per year2,38
Citation span2005 - 2026 (22)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 50

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae