Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Party, Policy, and the Ambition to Run for Higher Office

Bibliographic Data

ID6301249
AuthorsJohn H Aldrich (0009-0003-6345-1474, Duke University), Danielle M Thomsen (0000-0003-0446-6425, Syracuse University)
Year2017
Volume42
Issue2
Pages321-343
Publication date2017-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lsq.12161
OpenAlexW2549319827
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited22

This article examines why some state legislators run for Congress and others do not. Our main argument is that there are differences in the expected value of a state legislative seat and the expected benefits of being a member of Congress. One key component of this value is how closely the candidate fits with her party. We find that the probability of seeking congressional office increases among state legislators who are distant from the state party and proximate to the congressional party and decreases among those who are distant from the congressional party and proximate to the state party

Argument (complex analysis · Legislature · Political science · State (computer science · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Parties and professionals, an exploration of turnover in U.S. state legislatures

    Jordan Butcher•Journal of Legislative Studies•2025

  • Legislative Effectiveness, Progressive Ambition, and Electoral Success

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen, Sarah A Treul et al.•American Political Science Review•2026

  • Are Less Affluent People Less Likely to Run for Political Office

    Open Access•Pirmin Bundi, Reto Wüest•Swiss Political Science Review•2026

  • Ambition and Conflict in State Legislatures

    Celeste Fong, Christian Fong et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • The Source of the Legislative Professionalism Advantage

    Open Access•Zoe Nemerever, Daniel M Butler•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Perceptions of Party Incongruence and Nascent Political Ambition

    Open Access•Justin H Kirkland, Elizabeth N Simas et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • Strategic Candidate Entry and Congressional Elections in the Era of Fox News

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, Johanna Dunaway et al.•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•2011

  • The logic of delegation

    D Roderick Kiewiet•The logic of delegation•1991

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Congress as Public Enemy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Congress As Public Enemy•1995

  • When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Opting Out of Congress

    Open Access•Robert G Boatright•Political Science Quarterly•2018

  • Measuring State Legislative Professionalism

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2007

  • The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning

    Walter J Stone, L Sandy Maisel•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Ideological Moderates Won’t Run

    Danielle M Thomsen•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data

    Open Access•Gary King, Langche Zeng•Political Analysis•2001

  • Are Congressional Leaders Middlepersons or Extremists? Yes

    Open Access•Steve Jessee, Stephen Jessee et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Mapping the Ideological Marketplace

    Open Access•Adam Bonica•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition

    David W Rohde•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace

    Open Access•Adam Bonica•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • The Dynamics of Partisan Conflict on Congressional Approval

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Strategy and Choice in the 1982 Congressional Elections

    Gary C Jacobson, Samuel Kernell•PS Political Science & Politics•1982

  • Candidate Emergence Revisited

    Open Access•L Sandy Maisel, Walter J Stone•Political Science Quarterly•2014

  • An Analysis of Congressional Career Decisions, 1947-1986

    Open Access•D Roderick Kiewiet, Langche Zeng•American Political Science Review•1993

  • The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures

    Open Access•Boris Shor, Nolan Mccarty•American Political Science Review•2011

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,17
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae