Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning

Potential U.S. House Candidates' Nomination and General Election Prospects

Bibliographic Data

ID7410799
AuthorsWalter J Stone (0000-0001-5706-1232, University of California, Davis), L Sandy Maisel (Colby College)
Year2003
Volume65
Issue4
Pages951-977
Publication date2003-10-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00120
OpenAlexW2144433848
LanguageEN
Citations received113
References cited29

As the individual qualities of potential House candidates improve, their prospects in both the nomination and general election go up. The same is not true, however, for two key characteristics of the district context in which potential candidates might run: the party of the potential candidate in relation to the incumbent and the partisan makeup of the district. The direction of the effects of both incumbency and district partisanship on prospects, in contrast to the effects of quality, depends upon the stage of the election process. Using a survey of district informants in a random sample of House districts, we find that incumbent and potential-candidate quality both affect potential candidates' prospects of winning, with “strategic qualities” generally having a stronger direct effect than “personal qualities.” District partisanship has offsetting and strong effects on potential candidates’ chances in both stages: Nomination prospects decline as the partisan makeup of the district favors the potential candidate, while general election chances increase as district partisanship becomes more favorable. An expected parabolic relationship between chances of winning the seat and district partisanship clearly emerges in the analysis. These effects are fundamental to our understanding of the sources of competition in U.S. House elections

Competition (biology · Context (archaeology · Democracy · General election · Geography · Lower house · Nomination · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Quality (philosophy · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Media Influence and Politics

  • Partisan Models and the Search for Party Effects in the US Senate

    Barbara Sinclair•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Group Theory

    Andrew Mcfarland•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Party Faithful

    John C Green•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • How Parties Nominate Presidents

    William G Mayer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Comparative Advantage of State Interest Organization Research

    David Lowery, Virginia Gray•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Theories of Parties

    John H Aldrich, Jeffrey D Grynaviski•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Road Less Taken

    Daniel M Shea•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Party Coalitions in the US Congress

    D Brady, David W Brady•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Social and Economic Justice Movements and Organizations

    Dara Z Strolovitch, M David Forrest et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus?

    Kay Lehman Schlozman•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Party Nominating Procedures and Recruitment—State and Local Level

    Raymond J La Raja•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Activists, Influence, and Representation in American Elections

    Walter J Stone•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Methodological Issues in the Study of Political Parties

    Hubert Noël, Hans Noel•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Political Parties and Consultants

    David B Magleby•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • State Parties Research

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Mobilization and Influence of Business Interests

    Mark Alan Smith•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • What a Difference Twenty-Five Years Makes

    David W Rohde•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Groups and Agendas

    F R Baumgartner•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Groups in American Elections

    Clyde Wilcox, Rentaro Iida•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The State of Research on Political Parties and Interest Groups

    L Sandy Maisel, Jeffrey M Berry•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Evolution of National Party Organizations

    Paul S Herrnson•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Lobbying and Influence

    Beth L Leech•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Urban Interest Groups

    Jeffrey M Berry•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Evolution and Alteration of American Party Coalitions

    Mark D Brewer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Pure Partisan Institution

    Byron E Shafer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Linking Political Parties and Interest Groups

    M T Heaney•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The President, Party Politics, and Constitutional Development

    Sidney M Milki, Sidney M Milkis et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Winning Isn't Everything

    Ronald B Rapoport•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Methodological Perspectives on Interest Groups

    Scott H Ainsworth, Scott Ainsworth•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • American Political Parties

    Joel H Silbey•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Candidates and Voters

    Open Access•Walter J Stone•Candidates and Voters•2017

  • Opting Out of Congress

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen•Opting Out of Congress•2017

  • It Takes a Candidate

    Open Access•Jennifer L Lawle, Jennifer L Lawless et al.•It Takes a Candidate•2001

  • The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups

    Michael T Heaney, Louis Sandy Maisel et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Baker, Bus Driver, Babysitter, Candidate? Revealing the Gendered Development of Political Ambition Among Ordinary Americans

    Open Access•Melody Crowder-Meyer•Political Behavior•2020

  • Redistricting, Candidate Entry, and the Politics of Nineteenth‐Century U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Erik J Engstrom et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Assessing the “Experience Bonus” Through Examining Strategic Entry, Candidate Quality, and Campaign Receipts in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • Legislative Effectiveness, Progressive Ambition, and Electoral Success

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen, Sarah A Treul et al.•American Political Science Review•2026

  • Demand and Supply

    Open Access•Eric Gonzalez Juenke, Paru Shah•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2016

  • Race, Partisanship, and Democratic Politics

    Open Access•C Algara, I Hale•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2023

  • Many are called but few are chosen

    Angela X Ocampo, John Ray•Politics Groups and Identities•2019

  • The Impact of Prolonged Nomination Contests on Presidential Candidate Evaluations and General Election Vote Choice

    Open Access•Jeff DeWitt, Richard N Engstrom•Politics & Policy•2011

  • Presidential Strategies, Models of Leadership and the Development of Parties in a Candidate-Centred Polity

    Open Access•Gilles Ivaldi•French Politics•2007

  • The Race After the Race

    Open Access•Antoni Janusz, Agustín Vallejo•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • What’s a losing party to do? The calculus of contesting state legislative elections

    Open Access•Thomas M Carsey, William D Berry•Public Choice•2014

  • Running for office again

    Open Access•Vítor Castro, Rodrigo Martins•Public Choice•2013

  • Who Runs When

    Francesco Izzo, Federica Izzo•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Opportunities to govern

    Open Access•Andrew C Eggers, Anthony Fowler et al.•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures

    Kira Sanbonmatsu•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Constituency Building in Multimember Districts

    Open Access•Brian F Crisp, Scott W Desposato et al.•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Reconciling Family Roles with Political Ambition

    Richard L Fox, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Information, Activation, and Electoral Competition in the 2002 Congressional Elections

    Robert Huckfeldt, E G Carmines et al.•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Gaining and Losing Interest in Running for Public Office

    Richard L Fox, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in Primary Elections for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Michael H Crespin et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • Explaining Major and Third Party Candidate Entry in U.S. Gubernatorial Elections, 1980–2005

    Open Access•Conor M Dowling, Steve B Lem•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2009

  • The Sense of a Woman

    Open Access•Sarah A Fulton, Cherie D Maestas et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • A Comparative Look at Success in Regional Party Politics

    Harold A Young•Journal of global south studies•2019

  • What It Takes to Win

    Kathryn Pearson, Eric Mcghee•Politics & Gender•2013

  • Ideology and Gender in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen•Political Behavior•2018

  • National Party Efforts to Recruit State Legislators to Run for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Divisive Primaries and Incumbent General Election Performance

    Open Access•Gregg B Johnson, Meredith-Joy Petersheim et al.•American Politics Research•2010

  • Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Walter J Stone, Elizabeth N Simas•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition

    Open Access•Richard L Fox, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•American Political Science Review•2014

  • Proximity voting in the 2010 U.S. House elections

    Elizabeth N Simas•Electoral Studies•2013

  • Voter responses to challenger opportunity costs

    Open Access•Sanford C Gordon, Gregory A Huber et al.•Electoral Studies•2008

  • Mayors, Accomplishments, and Advancement

    Open Access•Eric S Heberlig, Justin Mccoy et al.•Urban Affairs Review•2017

  • Ideological Moderates Won’t Run

    Danielle M Thomsen•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • How Dispositional Empathy Influences Political Ambition

    Clifford, Scott Clifford et al.•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • Term Limits' Multiple Effects on State Legislators' Career Decisions

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2006

  • Bargain Shopping

    Open Access•Heather L Ondercin, Sarah A Fulton•Politics & Gender•2020

  • Endurance at the Top

    Open Access•Carol Galais, Patrik Öhberg et al.•Politics & Gender•2016

  • Running Backwards and in High Heels

    Open Access•Sarah A Fulton•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • The Implications of Apportionment on Quality Candidate Emergence and Electoral Competition

    Open Access•Matthew J Geras•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • What Are Friends for? The Effect of Geographic Proximity on Primary Turnout in Gubernatorial Elections

    Open Access•Zachary D Baumann, Jonathan Winburn et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Picking Their Spots

    Open Access•Steve B Lem, Conor M Dowling et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • The Personal and the Political in Repeat Congressional Candidacies

    Open Access•Andrew J Taylor, Robert G Boatright•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Leadership Experiences Within Civil Organizations and Candidacy in Public Elections

    Open Access•Martin Lundin, Oskar Nordström-Skans et al.•Political Behavior•2016

  • Stepping Up the Political Ladder

    Open Access•William Marble, Nathan Lee et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Why Do Experienced Challengers Do Better than Amateurs

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•Political Behavior•2008

  • The Personality of the Politically Ambitious

    Open Access•Adam M Dynes, Hans J G Hassell et al.•Political Behavior•2019

  • The Legislative Party and Candidate Recruitment in the American States

    Open Access•Kira Sanbonmatsu•Party Politics•2006

  • Strategic Challenger Entry in a Federal System

    Open Access•Steven Rogers•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Party, Policy, and the Ambition to Run for Higher Office

    Open Access•John H Aldrich, Danielle M Thomsen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Candidates, Campaigns, or Partisan Conditions? Reevaluating Strategic‐Politicians Theory

    Open Access•Scott J Basinger, Scott Basinger et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Unintended Consequences

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Why primaries? The party’s tradeoff between policy and valence

    Open Access•Gilles Serra•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2011

  • When Do War Chests Deter

    Open Access•Jay Goodliffe•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2005

  • Confident and cautious candidates

    Open Access•M Dahl, Jacob Nyrup•European Journal of Political…•2021

  • Ambition without democracy

    Guzel Garifullina•Democratization•2024

  • Female Candidates and Legislators

    Jennifer L Lawle•Annual Review of Political Science•2015

  • Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry

    Open Access•Kristin Kanthak, Jonathan Woon•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Strategic Candidate Entry and Congressional Elections in the Era of Fox News

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, Johanna Dunaway et al.•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • To Run or Not to Run for Office

    Open Access•Richard L Fox, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office

    Open Access•Richard L Fox, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • The House as a Stepping Stone to the Senate

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson, Bruce I Oppenheimer et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Quality Counts

    Walter J Stone, L Sandy Maisel et al.•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • District Complexity as an Advantage in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Michael J Ensley, Michael W Tofias et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Ignorance Is Bias

    Open Access•Eric Gonzalez Juenke•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Early Money and Strategic Candidate Exit

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment

    Morris P Fiorina•Congress, keystone of the…•1977

  • Politics, parties, & pressure groups.

    V O Key•Politics, parties, & pressure…•1964

  • Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U. S. House Elections

    Open Access•L Sandy Maisel, Walter J Stone•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • Does Casework Matter? A Reply to Professor Fiorina

    John Mcadams, John C Mcadams et al.•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • Name Familiarity, Reputation, and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Name Familiarity, Reputation, and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election

    Alan I Abramowitz•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes

    Steven D Levitt, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1997

  • The Deterrent Effect of Incumbency on Recruiting Challengers in U. S. House Elections

    Open Access•Thomas A Kazee•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1983

  • Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Inspected by #1184063113

    Carl Mccurley, Jeffery J Mondak•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Progressive Ambition in the House

    Paul Brace•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

    Jon R Bond, Cary R Covington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents

    Jeffery J Mondak•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections

    Robert S Erikson•Polity•1971

  • Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups

    Open Access•Sarah Finer, E Finer et al.•Political Studies•1958

  • Universalism and the Electoral Connection

    Open Access•Robert M Stein, Kenneth N Bickers•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, Jason L Saving•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections

    Morris P Fiorina•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition

    David W Rohde•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias

    Andrew Gelman, Gary King•American Journal of Political…•1990

  • Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections

    Jeffrey S Banks, D Roderick Kiewiet•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Inter-Party Competition and Primary Contesting

    Open Access•William H Standing, James A Robinson•American Political Science Review•1958

  • Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Thomas E Mann, Raymond E Wolfinger•American Political Science Review•1980

  • A Theory of Political Ambition

    Open Access•Gordon S Black•American Political Science Review•1972

  • Baby Books and Ballots

    Open Access•Albert D Cover, Bruce S Brumberg•American Political Science Review•1982

  • Party and Incumbency in Postwar Senate Elections

    Open Access•Warren Lee Kostroski•American Political Science Review•1973

Unique citing works113
Citations per year4,52
Citation span2001 - 2026 (26)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 113

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae