Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does Casework Matter? A Reply to Professor Fiorina

Bibliographic Data

ID11623973
AuthorsJohn Mcadams, John C Mcadams, John R Johannes
Year1981
Volume25
Issue3
Pages581-581
Publication date1981-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/2110820
OpenAlexW2319157638
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited12

As should all reviewers, Professor Morris Fiorina has not only commented forcefully on our article but has sought, in the best academic tradition, to teach two naive empiricists that an oversimplistic approach to a complex problem simply won't do. Of course it won't. But simple is not the same thing as simplistic. An acute and sophisticated understanding can underlie a simple model, while a complex model may be the result of simplistic thinking. We intend to demonstrate this. At the outset, we should like to make one point. We have said that we cannot pretend to know what causes congressmen to win as comfortably as they do. The essence of our paper is that doing a lot of casework, relative to the normal amount produced by unsolicited constituent requests, does not make much difference, if any, in election results. We hasten to note that our aggregate sample contains only a couple of congressmen who do virtually no casework, and none, to our knowledge, who make a habit of refusing to handle citizen requests for help. Perhaps if there were such members, even the most simplistic of statistical tests would show that they are punished by the voters, but perhaps not. We cannot tell. All we can do is take the best data available, operationalize key elements of important hypotheses (including the casework hypothesis), and offer the results

Empiricism · Epistemology · Operationalization · Point (geometry · Simple (philosophy · Data Analysis with R · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Saints and Cardinals in Appropriations Committees and the Fight against Distributive Politics

    Open Access•James D Savage•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1991

  • Determinants of Spending by House Challengers, 1974-84

    John Mcadams, John C Mcadams et al.•American Journal of Political…•1987

  • The Case of the Missing Reciprocal Influence

    David W Romero•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • The 1980 House Elections

    John Mcadams, John C Mcadams et al.•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning

    Walter J Stone, L Sandy Maisel•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • The Emergence of the Personal Vote

    Richard Herrera, Michael Yawn•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • The Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Incumbents

    Mark E Tompkins•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Congressmen, Perquisites, and Elections

    John Mcadams, John C Mcadams et al.•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • Going Local? Localized Rhetoric in Congressional Communications

    Open Access•Michael Heseltine•Political Communication•2025

  • Candidates, Money, and Voters-Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • What They Do Does Matter

    Open Access•David W Romero•Political Behavior•2006

  • The influence of strategic retirement on the incumbency advantage in US House elections

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2011

  • Who Franks? Explaining the Allocation of Official Resources

    Craig Goodman, David C W Parker•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • Recent Research on “Incumbency Advantage” in House Elections

    Richard S Beth•Congress & the Presidency•1984

  • Stump Speeches and Road Trips

    Open Access•Jeffrey S Hill, Elaine Rodriquez et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2010

  • Economic Voting and the "Symbolic Politics" Argument

    Open Access•M Stephen Weatherford•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment

    Morris P Fiorina•Congress, keystone of the…•1977

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • The Distribution of Casework in the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•John R Johannes•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1980

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Casework as a Technique of U. S. Congressional Oversight of the Executive

    Open Access•John R Johannes•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • Economic Discontent and Political Behavior

    Donald R Kinder, D Roderick Kiewiet•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections

    Morris P Fiorina•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • "Whites' Opposition to "Busing

    Open Access•David O Sears, Carl P Hensler et al.•American Political Science Review•1979

  • The American Voter in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Barbara Hinckley•American Political Science Review•1980

  • Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting

    Open Access•David O Sears, Richard R Lau et al.•American Political Science Review•1980

  • The Paradox of Not Voting

    Open Access•Stephen V Stephens•American Political Science Review•1975

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0,37
Citation span1983 - 2025 (43)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae