Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Quality Counts

Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence

Bibliographic Data

ID6230278
AuthorsWalter J Stone (0000-0001-5706-1232), L Sandy Maisel, Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas (0000-0001-7443-7772)
Year2004
Volume48
Issue3
Pages479
Publication date2004-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1519911
OpenAlexW4251322468
LanguageEN
Citations received95
References cited39

Competitive elections are essential to representative democracy. Competition in U.S. House elections is low in part because incumbents have strategic advantages that deter strong potential candidates from running. Many observers conclude that incumbents retain their seats without full accountability to the electorate, but the mechanisms of deterrence have never been fully explored from the perspective of strong potential candidates. Based on a survey of potential House candidates designed to capture perceptions of incumbents' personal quality and reelection prospects, we find strong evidence for the “strategic politicians” thesis (Black 1972; Jacobson and Kernell 1983). We extend the logic of the strategic model first by showing that incumbents' reelection prospects are affected by their personal quality and second by demonstrating that incumbents' personal qualities deter strong challengers from running, independent of their electoral prospects. Our findings prompt us to suggest revisions to our understanding of competition and representation in contemporary House elections

Accountability · Business · Competition (biology · Democracy · Deterrence theory · Economics · Microeconomics · Perception · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Representation (politics · Strategic interaction · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology

  • Tax Policy, Tax Competition, and Fiscal Rules

    Eckhard Janeba•FinanzArchiv•2014

  • Candidates and Voters

    Open Access•Walter J Stone•Candidates and Voters•2017

  • The American Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith et al.•American Congress•2011

  • Opting Out of Congress

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen•Opting Out of Congress•2017

  • The Qualifications Gap

    Open Access•Nichole M Bauer•Qualifications Gap•2020

  • It Takes a Candidate

    Open Access•Jennifer L Lawle, Jennifer L Lawless et al.•It Takes a Candidate•2001

  • Presidential approval, party brands, and candidate quality in U.S. national elections

    Open Access•C Algara, Byengseon Bae et al.•Research & Politics•2025

  • Assessing the “Experience Bonus” Through Examining Strategic Entry, Candidate Quality, and Campaign Receipts in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Preventing leaders' autocratic entrenchment by exponential super-majority threshold escalators

    Open Access•Reuven Shapira•Frontiers in Political Science•2023

  • (Sympathy for) the Devil You Know

    Open Access•Adam J Ramey, Jonathan Klingler et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2021

  • Richer Parties, Better Politics? Party-Centered Campaign Finance Laws and American Democracy

    Open Access•Raymond J La Raja•The Forum•2013

  • Judicial Selection and the Democratization of Justice

    Open Access•Amanda Driscoll, Michael J Nelson•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Outsiders among outside groups? Campaign advertising and the electability of female US House candidates

    Ashley English, R Branton et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2022

  • Voters Don't Care Much About Incumbency

    Open Access•Adam R Brown•Journal of Experimental Political…•2014

  • Uncontested Primaries

    Benoît S Y Crutzen, Nicolas Sahuguet•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2018

  • Do Quality Candidates and Incumbents Still Matter in the Partisan World? Comparing Trends and Relationship Between Candidate Differentials and Congressional Election Outcomes, 1900–2022

    C Algara, Byengseon Bae•Journal of Political Marketing•2024

  • Candidate B-Roll as Super PAC Subsidy

    Open Access•Gabriel Foy-Sutherland•American Politics Research•2025

  • The California Voting Rights Act and Uncontested City Council Seats

    Open Access•George Glasgow•Urban Affairs Review•2025

  • Nevertheless, He Persisted

    Open Access•Christian Dyogi Phillips•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Vote Choices and Valence

    Open Access•Ingrid Mauerer, Gerhard Tutz•Political Analysis•2024

  • Party Nomination Strategies in Flexible-List PR

    Open Access•Petr Dvořák, Michal Pink•East European Politics and…•2023

  • Recruiting, Grooming, and Reaping the Rewards

    Nicole Asmussen Mathew, Mathew Kunz•Congress & the Presidency•2017

  • Gender, risk assessment, and political ambition

    Open Access•Jennie Sweet-Cushman•Politics and the Life Sciences•2016

  • Los presidentes latinoamericanos y las características de la democracia

    Open Access•Manuel Alcántara Sáez, Manuel Alcántara et al.•Colombia Internacional•2016

  • Qualidade Da Classe Política

    Open Access•Renato Perissinotto, Adriano Codato et al.•Lua Nova Revista de Cultura e…•2025

  • Playing politics with traffic fines

    Open Access•Min Su, Christian Buerger•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • An Ordinal Item Response Model for Understanding Attitudes

    Open Access•Ingrid Mauerer, Gerhard Tutz•Sociological Methods & Research•2025

  • Policy-seeking candidates who value the valence attributes of the winner

    Open Access•James Adams, Samuel Merrill•Public Choice•2013

  • What’s a losing party to do? The calculus of contesting state legislative elections

    Open Access•Thomas M Carsey, William D Berry•Public Choice•2014

  • Pay for politicians and campaign spending

    Open Access•Nicolas Gavoille•Public Choice•2021

  • A preferential attachment model of campaign contributions in state legislative elections

    Open Access•Greg Vonnahme•Public Choice•2014

  • Editor’s Choice

    Kevin Deluca•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • The Multidimensional Disadvantages of Centrist Parties in Western Europe

    Open Access•Roi Zur•Political Behavior•2021

  • The Neglected Role and Variability of Party Intercepts in the Spatial Valence Approach

    Open Access•Ingrid Mauerer•Political Analysis•2020

  • Selection and Sanctioning in European Parliamentary Elections

    Open Access•Sara B Hobolt, Bjørn Høyland•British Journal of Political…•2011

  • Divisive Primaries and Incumbent General Election Performance

    Open Access•Gregg B Johnson, Meredith-Joy Petersheim et al.•American Politics Research•2010

  • Incumbency Reconsidered

    Walter J Stone, Sarah A Fulton et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in Primary Elections for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Michael H Crespin et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • Explaining Major and Third Party Candidate Entry in U.S. Gubernatorial Elections, 1980–2005

    Open Access•Conor M Dowling, Steve B Lem•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2009

  • Yo prefiero al corrupto el perfil de los ciudadanos que eligen políticos deshonestos pero competentes

    Open Access•María Del Mar Martínez Rosón•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2024

  • Time Spent in the House

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus, Amy Steigerwalt et al.•Politics & Gender•2022

  • National Party Efforts to Recruit State Legislators to Run for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Female Candidates’ Incumbency and Quality (Dis)Advantage in Local Elections

    Danielle Joesten Martins, Meredith Conroy•Women & Politics•2024

  • The effect of candidate electoral experience on ballot placement in list proportional representation systems

    Gert-Jan Put, Gertjan Muyters et al.•West European Politics•2021

  • Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage

    Scott Ashworth, Ethan Bueno De Mesquita•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Ideological Moderates Won’t Run

    Danielle M Thomsen•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • The Primary Path for Turning Legislative Effectiveness into Electoral Success

    Sarah A Treul, Sarah Treul et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • When Candidates Value Good Character

    James Adams, Samuel Merrill et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Candidates Matter

    Matthew K Buttice, Walter J Stone•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Intersectional Opportunities

    Christian Dyogi Phillips•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • The Good, the Bad and the Winner

    Open Access•María Del Mar Martínez Rosón•Revista de ciencia política•2014

  • Uncontested Seats Phenomenon

    Paweł Stępień, Michał Pierzgalski•Representation•2025

  • Gendered Candidate Emergence in Britain

    Open Access•Peter Allen•Politics•2013

  • Incumbent-Quality Advantage and Counterfactual Electoral Stagnation in the US Senate

    Open Access•Ivan Pastine, Tuvana Pastine et al.•Politics•2015

  • How Much of the Incumbency Advantage is Due to Scare-Off

    Open Access•Arnold Bennett Hall, Andrew B Hall et al.•Political Science Research and…•2015

  • Challenger entry and electoral accountability

    Open Access•Jacob Morrier•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • Running Backwards and in High Heels

    Open Access•Sarah A Fulton•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • Conditions for Competition in Low-Information Judicial Elections

    Open Access•Matthew J Streb, Brian Frederick•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • The Implications of Apportionment on Quality Candidate Emergence and Electoral Competition

    Open Access•Matthew J Geras•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional Primaries

    Open Access•Casey B K Dominguez•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Picking Their Spots

    Open Access•Steve B Lem, Conor M Dowling et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • The Sense of a Woman

    Open Access•Sarah A Fulton, Cherie D Maestas et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Ambition, Gender, and the Judiciary

    Open Access•Margaret S Williams•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Assessing How Timing and Repetition of Scandal Information Affects Candidate Evaluations

    Open Access•Dona‐gene Mitchell•Political Psychology•2014

  • Stepping Up the Political Ladder

    Open Access•William Marble, Nathan Lee et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • War Chests as Precautionary Savings

    Open Access•Jay Goodliffe•Political Behavior•2004

  • Why Do Experienced Challengers Do Better than Amateurs

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•Political Behavior•2008

  • Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•David L Eckles, Cindy D Kam et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • When Gender Matters

    Open Access•Sarah A Fulton•Political Behavior•2014

  • Extracting Wisdom from Experts and Small Crowds

    Open Access•Cherie D Maestas, Cherie Maestas et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • When does valence matter? Heightened valence effects for governing parties during election campaigns

    Open Access•Ronni Abney, Ronni Marie Abney et al.•Party Politics•2013

  • Job Approval and Senate Election Outcomes In the United States

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Challenger Quality and the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Pamela Ban, Elena Llaudet et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Evidence of a Local Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Jessica Trounstine•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Campaign War Chests and Challenger Quality in Senate Elections

    Open Access•Jay Goodliffe•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Candidates, Campaigns, or Partisan Conditions? Reevaluating Strategic‐Politicians Theory

    Open Access•Scott J Basinger, Scott Basinger et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • The electoral strategies of a populist candidate

    Open Access•Gilles Serra•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2018

  • When Do War Chests Deter

    Open Access•Jay Goodliffe•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2005

  • The Career Length and Service of Female Policymakers in the US House of Representatives

    Open Access•Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer•Government and Opposition•2018

  • The good, the loyal or the active? MPs’ parliamentary performance and the achievement of static and progressive career ambitions in parliament

    Open Access•Richard Schobe, Benjamin De Vet•European Political Science Review•2022

  • Quotas and qualifications

    Open Access•Ana Catalano Weeks, Lisa Baldez•European Political Science Review•2015

  • Candidate quality across different orders of elections

    Jan Kovář, Kamil Kovář•East European Politics•2013

  • Good Types” in Authoritarian Elections

    Open Access•Melanie Manion•Comparative Political Studies•2017

  • Donors, Primary Elections, and Polarization in the United States

    Open Access•Jordan Kujala•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Valence and Campaigns

    Open Access•Jennifer Carter, John W Patty•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall, Chris W Bonneau•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Selecting the ‘Best’? Competing Dimensions of Politician Quality in the Developing World

    Open Access•Ananish Chaudhuri, Vegard Iversen et al.•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Stuck in the middle

    Open Access•Roi Zur•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Location, Location, Location

    Open Access•Heather L Ondercin•British Journal of Political…•2022

  • Whither the party vote bonus? Stand-down agreements in Ukraine's mixed-member system

    Open Access•Shlomo Bloom, Stephen Bloom et al.•Electoral Studies•2018

  • Challenger Entry and Voter Learning

    Open Access•Sanford C Gordon, Gregory A Huber et al.•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Competing on Good Politicians

    Open Access•Vincenzo Galasso, Tommaso Nannicini•American Political Science Review•2011

  • Money in Politics

    Open Access•Thanh Le, Ilke Onur et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment

    Morris P Fiorina•Congress, keystone of the…•1977

  • The Personal Vote

    Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain et al.•Personal Vote•1987

  • Elbridge Gerry's Salamander

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Jonathan Ned Katz•Elbridge Gerry's Salamander•2002

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U. S. House Elections

    Open Access•L Sandy Maisel, Walter J Stone•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • The Personal Vote

    Open Access•William H Flanigan•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning

    Walter J Stone, L Sandy Maisel•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Elections as Filters

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Elections as Filters

    Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U. S. House

    Open Access•Steven D Levitt, Catherine D Wolfram et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • The Deterrent Effect of Incumbency on Recruiting Challengers in U. S. House Elections

    Open Access•Thomas A Kazee•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1983

  • Strategic Decisions on Candidacy in U. S. Congressional Districts

    Open Access•William T Bianco•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1984

  • Challengers in U. S. Senate Elections

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1989

  • Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•American Political Science Review•1989

  • The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House Elections

    Jay Goodliffe•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Inspected by #1184063113

    Carl Mccurley, Jeffery J Mondak•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

    Jon R Bond, Cary R Covington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents

    Jeffery J Mondak•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections

    Jonathan S Krasno, Donald P Green•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections

    Robert S Erikson•Polity•1971

  • Candidates, Money, and Voters-Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Campaign War Chests and Challenger Emergence in State Legislative Elections

    Open Access•R Edward Hogan•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition

    David W Rohde•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias

    Andrew Gelman, Gary King•American Journal of Political…•1990

  • One Good Term Deserves Another

    Albert D Cover•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections

    Jeffrey S Banks, D Roderick Kiewiet•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Strategy and Choice in the 1982 Congressional Elections

    Gary C Jacobson, Samuel Kernell•PS Political Science & Politics•1982

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Thomas E Mann, Raymond E Wolfinger•American Political Science Review•1980

  • A Theory of Political Ambition

    Open Access•Gordon S Black•American Political Science Review•1972

Unique citing works93
Citations per year3,8
Citation span2001 - 2025 (25)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 94

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae