Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Challengers in U. S. Senate Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID7329374
AuthorsPeverill Squire (0000-0003-4718-8226, corresponding author)
Year1989
Volume14
Issue4
Pages531-531
Publication date1989-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/439957
OpenAlexW2312616243
LanguageEN
Citations received75
References cited10

Political science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration

  • Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns

    Kim Fridkin Kahn•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Issue Politics in Congress

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin•Issue politics in Congress•2005

  • The Normalization of the Radical Right

    Vicente Valentim•The Normalization of the Radical…•2024

  • Randomization Inference in the Regression Discontinuity Design

    Open Access•Matias D Cattaneo, Brigham R Frandsen et al.•Journal of Causal Inference•2015

  • Strategy, Selection, and Candidate Competition in U.S. House and Senate Elections

    Jamie L Carson•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Conditioning Factors for Re-election and Incumbency Advantage after a Natural Disaster

    Andrés A Acuña-Duarte, César Salazar et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2021

  • Women and candidate quality in the elections for the Senate

    Open Access•Simone R Bohns•Brazilian Political Science Review•2007

  • Democratic incumbent resilience in the post-1980 Senate

    Open Access•Nicholas Goedert•Research & Politics•2018

  • The Fading Exceptionalism of American Political Parties

    Anne E Baker•Comparative Sociology•2014

  • A Comparison of National Effects on Individual U.S. Senate Elections

    Open Access•Scott Lasley, Mary Stegmaier•Politics & Policy•2001

  • Freshmen Elections in the 1990s

    Open Access•Sunil K Ahuja•Politics & Policy•2003

  • What’s in a Campaign Logo? Exploring Differences in Candidate Self-Presentation through Campaign Logos

    Alexandra Williams, Trudy Horsting et al.•Journal of Political Marketing•2022

  • Do Interest Group Endorsements Cue Individual Contributions to House Candidates

    Open Access•Anne E Baker•American Politics Research•2015

  • Candidate Quality and the Election of Republican Governors in the South, 1950-2004

    Open Access•A J Barghothi, Elisha Carol Savchak et al.•American Politics Research•2009

  • Reevaluating Spending in Gubernatorial Races

    Kedron Bardwell•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Incumbency and the News Media in U.S. Senate Elections

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn•Political Research Quarterly•1993

  • District Populations and Partisan Bias

    Open Access•Barry Burden, Veronica J Judson•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Tweeting to be a constitution-writer in Chile

    Open Access•Andrés A Acuña-Duarte, Pedro G Campos et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • Campaign Finance Laws and the Competition for Spending in Gubernatorial Elections

    Open Access•Kedron Bardwell•Social Science Quarterly•2003

  • Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates

    Kim Fridkin Kahn•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Responsiveness and Electoral Accountability in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Benjamin J Kassow, Charles J Finocchiaro•American Politics Research•2011

  • I Am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use among Congressional Candidates

    Kevin M Wagner, J Gainous et al.•Women & Politics•2017

  • The Political and Demographic Predictors of Candidate Emergence in City Council Elections

    Open Access•Timothy B Krebs•Urban Affairs Review•1999

  • What Makes a Successful Candidate? Political Experience and Low-Information Cues in Elections

    Lara Portmann, Lea Portmann•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Preemptive Fund-raising and Challenger Profile in Senate Elections

    Peverill Squire•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • Quality, Not Quantity

    D Lublin, David Ian Lublin•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • The Choosers or the Choices? Voter Characteristics and the Structure of Electoral Competition as Explanations for Ticket Splitting

    Douglas D Roscoe•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Equilibrium Projections of the Consequences of Term Limits Upon Expected Tenure, Institutional Turnover, and Membership Experience

    Wayne L Francis, Wayne Francis et al.•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • The Mobilization of U.S. State Electorates in the 1988 and 1990 Elections

    Robert A Jackson, Robert Jackson•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Job Approval and Senate Election Outcomes In the United States

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Chasing Fool’s Gold? Converting U.S. Senate Appointments into Election

    Timothy Lynch•Congress & the Presidency•2019

  • Temp to Perm

    Timothy Lynch•Congress & the Presidency•2017

  • Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections

    David T Canon•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House Elections

    Jay Goodliffe•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Testing the Basis of Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Erik J Engstrom, Nathan W Monroe•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2006

  • Party, Performance, and Strategic Politicians

    Open Access•Adam R Brown, Gary C Jacobson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2008

  • Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in Primary Elections for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Michael H Crespin et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • What Price Justice(s)? Understanding Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2005

  • Strategic Candidate Decisionmaking and Competition in Gubernatorial Nonincumbent-Party Primaries

    Open Access•Insun Kang, Richard G Niemi et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2003

  • Red Scare? Revisiting Joe McCarthy’s Influence on 1950s Elections

    Adam J Berinsky, Gabriel S Lenz•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Money and Challenger Emmergence in Gubernatorial Primaries

    Open Access•Kedron Bardwell•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Challenger Quality in State Legislative Elections

    Emily Van Dunk•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections

    Peverill Squire, Christina Fastnow•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Melinda Gann Hall•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Reevaluating Spending in Gubernatorial Races

    Open Access•Kedron Bardwell•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Candidates, Money, and Voters-Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • The Implications of Apportionment on Quality Candidate Emergence and Electoral Competition

    Open Access•Matthew J Geras•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Fit for the Job

    Open Access•Lonna Rae Atkeson, Brian T Hamel•Political Behavior•2020

  • Information and Perceptions of Electability in Primary Elections

    Open Access•Sarah E Anderson, Barry Burden et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Why Do Experienced Challengers Do Better than Amateurs

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•Political Behavior•2008

  • Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Emergence in Senate Elections

    Open Access•Greg D Adams, Peverill Squire•Political Behavior•1997

  • Television Markets and U. S. Senate Elections

    Open Access•Charles Stewart Iii, C Neal Stewart et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Michael H Crespin et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • The Importance of Issues in Senate Campaigns

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick J Kenney•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2001

  • The Impact of Term Limits on the Candidacy Decisions of State Legislators in U. S. House Elections

    Open Access•Richard J Powell, Richard Powell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Legislative Resources and Electoral Margins

    Open Access•Chao-Chi Shan, Jeffrey M Stonecash•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • Campaign War Chests and Challenger Quality in Senate Elections

    Open Access•Jay Goodliffe•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Unintended Consequences

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Electronic Grassroots

    Kevin M Wagner, J Gainous•Journal of Legislative Studies•2009

  • Member Attributes and Corporate Contributions to United States Senators

    Open Access•James L Regens, Ronald Keith Gaddie et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•1993

  • Strategic Candidate Entry and Congressional Elections in the Era of Fox News

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, Johanna Dunaway et al.•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Quality Counts

    Walter J Stone, L Sandy Maisel et al.•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall, Chris W Bonneau•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Getting “Primaried” in the Senate

    Chase B Meyer•Congress & the Presidency•2022

  • The Case of the Wayfaring Challenger

    Samuel C Patterson, Thomas W Kephart•Congress & the Presidency•1991

  • Electoral Verdicts

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau•American Politics Research•2005

  • Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Entry in Statewide Elections

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•American Politics Research•2008

  • Do Negative Messages Work

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin, Kim Leslie Fridkin et al.•American Politics Research•2004

  • The Prospects-Based Dynamics of the House Candidacy Decision

    Open Access•David W Romero•American Politics Research•2004

  • Explaining Campaign Intensity

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin•American Politics Research•2001

  • Forecasting the 2006 Elections for the United States Senate

    Carl Klarner, Carl E Klarner et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2006

  • Fundamental models for forecasting elections at the state level

    Open Access•Patrick Hummel, David Rothschild•Electoral Studies•2014

  • Challenger Profile and Gubernatorial Elections

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•The Western Political Quarterly•1992

  • Do voters prefer educated candidates? How candidate education influences vote choice in congressional elections

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, Ryan J Vander Wielen•Electoral Studies•2023

  • The distorting effects of racial animus on proximity voting in the 2016 elections

    Open Access•C Algara, I Hale•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

    Jon R Bond, Cary R Covington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • The Fault, Dear Brutus

    Raisa B Deber, Raisa Deber•The Journal of Politics•1982

  • Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections

    Jonathan S Krasno, Donald P Green•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • When Women Run Against Men

    R Darcy, Sarah Slavin Schramm•Public Opinion Quarterly•1977

  • The Chances of Regaining One's Seat by Revenging a Defeat

    Peverill Squire•Polity•1986

  • Competitiveness of Senate Seats and Voting Behavior in Senate Elections

    Mark C Westlye•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition

    David W Rohde•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Explaining Senate Election Outcomes

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Incumbency and The Presidential Vote in Senate Elections

    Open Access•Barbara Hinckley•American Political Science Review•1970

Unique citing works75
Citations per year2,08
Citation span1990 - 2025 (36)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 75

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae