Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The use of intergovernmental grants to municipalities for electoral purposes by subnational governments

Bibliographic Data

ID6302682
AuthorsKadour Mehiriz (Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre eau, terre et environnement, Quebec, Canada, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume43
Issue2
Pages274-290
Publication date2017-03-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLocal Government Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0300-3930 • E-ISSN: 1743-9388
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03003930.2016.1263189
OpenAlexW2558377847
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited31

Subnational governments devote a significant share of their financial resources to help municipalities provide local public services to their citizens. Compared to the large number of studies on national governments, little effort has been devoted to the influence of distributive politics on the use of intergovernmental grants by subnational governments. To fill this gap, this study uses a data set covering the period 2001–2011 to verify to what extent the Québec government used conditional grants to municipalities for electoral purposes. The results of this study show that the allocation of grants to municipalities is not exempt from electoral politics as municipalities located in districts held by governing parties or in high electoral competition districts receive more grants than other municipalities. However, the influence of electoral politics decreases substantially when the management of intergovernmental grants is under tight scrutiny by the opposition parties, mass media and the population. These findings suggest that distributive politics can be conceptualised as a political agency problem whose prevalence is seriously constrained by the improvement of the transparency of public policies management

Agency (philosophy · Economics · Electoral geography · Local government · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Population · Public economics · Scrutiny · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Corporate Taxation and Avoidance · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • Two hats, one purse

    Open Access•Benjamin Descamps, Carine Smolders•Local Government Studies•2026

  • Who spends what, and why? The constituency project fund and electoral politics in Ghana

    Open Access•Kenneth Felitse, Isaac Owusu-Mensah•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2024

  • Bangers and cash

    Guto Ifan•Regional Studies•2024

  • Decentralised governance and empowerment of county governments in China

    Yong Fan, Yan Wu et al.•Local Government Studies•2018

  • The effect of electoral politics on the distribution of public spending in the context of democratic transition

    Open Access•Kaddour Mehiriz, Nizar Jouini•Democratization•2025

  • Multi‐level party favoritism

    Open Access•Adam Gendźwiłł, Paweł Swianiewicz et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2025

  • The power to tax

    Geoffrey Brennan, James M Buchanan•The power to tax•1980

  • Theories of Tax Competition

    John D Wilson•National Tax Journal•1999

  • The Influence of Redistributive Politics on the Decision Making of Quasi-autonomous Organizations. The Case of Infrastructures-Transport (Quebec–Canada)

    Kaddour Mehiriz•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Assessing Local Capacity for Federal Grant-Getting

    Open Access•Jeremy L Hall•The American Review of Public…•2008

  • Second generation fiscal federalism

    Open Access•Barry R Weingast•Journal of Urban Economics•2009

  • The road to power

    Open Access•Marcelin Joanis•Public Choice•2011

  • The political determination of intergovernmental grants in Australia

    Open Access•Andrew C Worthington, Brian Dollery et al.•Public Choice•1998

  • A political theory of intergovernmental grants

    Open Access•Philip J Grossman•Public Choice•1994

  • The Politics–Administration Dichotomy in U.S. Historical Context

    Open Access•David H Rosenbloom, David Rosenbloom•Public Administration Review•2008

  • The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs

    Barry R Weingast, Kenneth A Shepsle et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1981

  • Federal grants to municipalities in Canada

    Open Access•Fabio Bojorquez, Éric Champagne et al.•Canadian Public Administration•2009

  • The Congressional Pork Barrel in a Republican Era

    Kenneth N Bickers, Robert M Stein•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics

    Avinash Dixit, John Londregan•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Interlocal Cooperation and the Distribution of Federal Grant Awards

    Kenneth N Bickers, Robert M Stein•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game

    Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•The Journal of Politics•1986

  • Political Economy of Grant Allocations

    Gamkhar, Shama Gamkhar et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2007

  • A Case for Reinterpreted Dichotomy of Politics and Administration as a Professional Standard in Council-Manager Government

    Robert S Montjoy, Douglas J Watson•Public Administration Review•1995

  • Vote Buying With Multiple Distributive Goods

    Open Access•Michael Albertus•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • Electoral Accountability

    Scott Ashworth•Annual Review of Political Science•2012

  • Distributive Politics Around the World

    Miriam Golden, Brian Min•Annual Review of Political Science•2013

  • Does Decentralization Improve Perceptions of Accountability? Attitudinal Evidence from Colombia

    Open Access•María C Escobar-Lemmon, Maria Escobar‐lemmon et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Decentralization and Governance

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Faguet•World Development•2013

  • Representative misconduct, voter perceptions and accountability

    Open Access•Nick Vivyan, Markus Wagner et al.•Electoral Studies•2012

  • The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote, 1968-96

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Perverse Accountability

    Open Access•C Stoke, Susan C Stoke et al.•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Legislative Bargaining and the Dynamics of Public Investment

    Open Access•Marco Battaglini, Salvatore Nunnari et al.•American Political Science Review•2012

  • On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments

    Open Access•Matz Dahlberg, Eva Johansson•American Political Science Review•2002

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae