Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Social media homophily among women and men political candidates

Bibliographic Data

ID6310697
AuthorsIulia Cioroianu (0000-0002-5543-6819, University of Bath), H Coffe (0000-0002-0020-0227, University of Bath)
Year2025
Volume78
Issue3
Pages555-580
Publication date2025-07-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pa/gsae033
OpenAlexW4403664088
LanguageEN
References cited75

This paper assesses differences between women and men political candidates in their likelihood to interact with peers who share the same gender, political affiliation, electoral district, incumbency, age, and the governmental status of their party. Using Twitter (currently X) data from Finland’s 2019 election campaign, we find a tendency towards homophily—a tendency to interact predominantly with similar others—among all candidates across the various studied characteristics. However, some gender differences in the tendency towards homophily emerge. Notably, women are more inclined than men to retweet candidates from their own party but are less likely to retweet peers with the same incumbency status and the same gender. Our multivariate analyses further show that retweet tendencies based on age, shared electoral district and party governmental status exhibit no significant gender disparities. These nuanced variations in homophilous relations highlight the complex interplay between gender and other characteristics in candidates’ social media interactions during electoral campaigns

Homophily · Political science · Politics · Social media · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes

    Open Access•Sanne Kruikemeier•Computers in Human Behavior•2014

  • Partisan asymmetries in online political activity

    Open Access•Michael D Conover, Bruno Gonçalves et al.•EPJ Data Science•2012

  • A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference

    A Colin Cameron, Douglas L Miller•The Journal of Human Resources•2015

  • Freedom and control in modern society

    Morroe Berger•Freedom and control in modern…•1978

  • Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•Paul Warwick•Government Survival in…•1995

  • Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data

    Open Access•Elanor Colleoni, Alessandro Rozza et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands

    Open Access•Joe Phua, Seunga Venus Jin et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2016

  • Dynamic social media affiliations among UK politicians

    Open Access•Iain S Weaver, H Williams et al.•Social Networks•2018

  • Gender, rank, and social networks on an enterprise social media platform

    Open Access•Giorgia Di Tommaso, Mauro Gatti et al.•Social Networks•2020

  • How MPs ties to interest groups matter for legislative co-sponsorship

    Open Access•Manuel Fischer, Frédéric Varone et al.•Social Networks•2018

  • Parties, issues, and power

    H Coffe, Catherine Bolzendahl et al.•European Journal of Politics and…•2019

  • A visual analysis of gender stereotypes in campaign advertising

    Colleen M Carpinella, Nichole M Bauer•Politics Groups and Identities•2019

  • Working the fields of big data

    Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, Matti Nelimarkka et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2017

  • Lost in Technology? Political Parties and the Online Campaigns of Constituency Candidates in Germany's Mixed Member Electoral System

    Thomas Zittel•Journal of Information Technology…•2009

  • A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections

    Open Access•Kim Strandberg•New Media & Society•2013

  • Social media network homophily among political candidates in multilevel settings

    Open Access•H Coffe, Iulia Cioroianu et al.•Regional & Federal Studies•2022

  • Government Formation and Political Discussions in Twitter

    Open Access•Frederic Guerrero-Sole, Hibai Lopez-Gonzalez•Social Science Computer Review•2017

  • Political Interaction Beyond Party Lines

    Open Access•Marc Esteve Del Valle, Marcel Broersma et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2021

  • Mapping online social networks of Korean politicians

    Open Access•Chien-Leng Hsu, Han Woo Park•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • Paving an Alternative Route

    Herminia Ibarra•Social Psychology Quarterly•1997

  • The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Bruce A Desmarais, Bruce Desmarais et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Sex and the Statehouse

    Open Access•R Edward Hogan•Social Science Quarterly•2008

  • Going public against institutional constraints? Analyzing the online presence intensity of 2014 European Parliament election candidates

    Open Access•Javier Lorenzo Rodríguez, Amuitz Garmendia Madariaga•European Union Politics•2016

  • Communication dynamics in twitter during political campaigns

    Open Access•Pablo Aragón, Karolin Eva Kappler et al.•Policy & Internet•2013

  • Incumbents' Advantages in the 1978 U. S. Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1981

  • Political Friendship in the Legislature

    Gregory A Caldeira, Samuel C Patterson•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • The Politics of Interruptions

    Sebastián Vallejo Vera, Analía Gómez Vidal•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes

    Justin H Kirkland•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Gendered Recruitment without Trying

    Melody Crowder-Meyer•Politics & Gender•2013

  • Negotiating Gendered Institutions

    Open Access•Sarah Child, Sarah Childs•Politics & Gender•2013

  • The Gendered Debate

    Open Access•Lotte Hargrave, Tone Langengen•Politics & Gender•2021

  • Gender Differences in Constituency Service among State Legislators

    Open Access•Lilliard E Richardson, Patricia K Freeman•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators' Policy Preferences

    Sarah Poggione•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • When Do Female MPs Represent Women’s Interests? Electoral Systems and the Legislative Behavior of Women

    Open Access•Daniel Höhmann•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Connecting the Congress

    Open Access•J H Fowler•Political Analysis•2006

  • Gender Differences in Legislator Responsiveness

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen, Bailey Sanders et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2020

  • The Power of Sex and Incumbency

    Open Access•Rainbow Murray•Party Politics•2008

  • Controlled networking

    Open Access•Bruno Wüest, Christian Mueller et al.•Party Politics•2021

  • Women and Representation

    Adele Klara Lausberg•Parliamentary Affairs•2016

  • A New Way of Doing Politics? Cross-Party Women's Caucuses as Critical Actors in Uganda and Uruguay

    Niki Johnson, Cecilia Josefsson•Parliamentary Affairs•2016

  • Networks in the Legislative Arena

    Open Access•Kathleen A Bratton, Stella M Rouse•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Submissive Lobby Fodder or Assertive Political Actors? Party Loyalty of Career Politicians in the UK House of Commons, 2005–15

    Open Access•Raphael J Heuwieser•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Men Idle, Women Network

    Open Access•Stefan Wojcik, Shawnna Mullenax•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Playing with different cards

    Open Access•Tània Verge Mestre, Tánia Verge et al.•International Political Science…•2014

  • When Informality Advantages Women

    Open Access•Jennifer M Piscopo•Government and Opposition•2016

  • Analysing Women's Substantive Representation

    Open Access•Sarah Child, Sarah Childs et al.•Government and Opposition•2009

  • A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties

    Kaare W Strøm, Kaare Strom•American Journal of Political…•1990

  • Partisan Webs

    Open Access•Gregory Koger, Seth Masket et al.•British Journal of Political…•2009

  • Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour's Women MPs

    Open Access•Patrick Cowley, Philip Cowley et al.•British Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Gender of Social Capital

    Open Access•R S Burt•Rationality and Society•1998

  • Political Alliance Formation and Cooperation Networks in the Utah State Legislature

    Open Access•C Amelia Davis, D Redhead et al.•Human Nature•2022

  • Homophily in Voluntary Organizations

    J Miller Mcpherson, L Smith-Lovin•American Sociological Review•1987

  • Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking

    Open Access•Lyn Kathlene•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Gender and Party Discipline

    Open Access•Anthony Clayton, Pär Zetterberg•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Cross-cutting Social Networks

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•American Political Science Review•2002

  • The Effect of Gender on Interruptions at Congressional Hearings

    Open Access•Marilyn G Miller, Joseph L Sutherland•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Birds of a Feather

    Miller Mcpherson, L Smith-Lovin et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2001

  • Homophily and Segregation in Cooperative Networks

    David Melamed, B Simpson et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2020

  • The Hierarchy of Authority in Organizations

    Peter M Blau•American Journal of Sociology•1968

  • Homophily in collaborations among US House Representatives, 1981-2018

    Open Access•Z P Neal, Rachel Domagalski et al.•Social Networks•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae